Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION KAPLAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs in these consolidated class actions seek damages and other relief for alleged price fixing in violation of the antitrust laws. The matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion to certify a plaintiff class. Facts Except as otherwise noted, the following discussion assumes the truth of the allegation

135 F.Supp.2d 438 (2001) In re AUCTION HOUSES ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to: All Actions No. 00 CIV. 0648(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 26, 2001. *439 David Boies, Richard Drubel, Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP, Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel. Shepard Goldfein, Michael L. Weiner, Skadden,

138 F.Supp.2d 548 (2001) In re AUCTION HOUSES ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to: All Actions No. 00 CIV. 0648(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 12, 2001. David Boies, Richard Drubel, Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP, New York City, for Plaintiffs. *549 Shepard Goldfein, Michael L. Weiner, Ska

444 B.R. 767 (2011) In re TELESERVICES GROUP, INC., Debtor. Marcia R. Meoli, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. The Huntington National Bank, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. HG 05-00690. Adversary No. 07-80037. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan. March 17, 2011. *772 Douglas A. Donnell, Esq., and John E. Anding, Esq., Grand Rapids,

154 S.W.3d 859 (2005) Kaye ADAMS, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BELLS/SAVOY and Shirley Mullinix, Appellees. No. 05-03-00509-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. January 25, 2005. *863 Robert W. Minshew, James Morris, Kennedy & Minshew, P.C., Sherman, for Appellant. *864 Ri

702 F.Supp.2d 320 (2010) ANIMAL SCIENCE PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHINA NATIONAL METALS & MINERALS IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. 05-4376(GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 1, 2010. *325 Robert A. Magnanini, Esq., Stone and Magnanini, LLP, Richard E. Donovan, E

814 P.2d 1082 (1991) 311 Or. 550 United States NATIONAL BANK of Oregon, a National Banking Association, Petitioner On Review, v. Neal J. BOGE, Respondent On Review, Martin Boge, Defendant, v. J.M. Crowley, Third-Party Defendant. CC 86-2083, CA A50913, SC S37348. Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. Argued and Submitted December 5, 1990.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 456 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 457 THE COURT. This appeal is prosecuted by the complainants from a judgment in favor of respondents, made and entered by t

678 S.W.2d 661 (1984) STATE NATIONAL BANK OF EL PASO, Appellant, v. FARAH MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Appellee. No. 08-82-00160-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. August 29, 1984. Rehearing Denied November 7, 1984. *666 Marvin S. Sloman, Robert L. Blumenthal, Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, Da

574 F.Supp. 1453 (1983) TIMBERLANE LUMBER COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. Nos. C 73-0792 SW, C 74-0275 SW, C 74-0277 SW and C 74-0278 SW. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 24, 1983. *1454 *1455 Joh

273 F.Supp. 718 (1967) Bruce R. RIPPEY and A. Gordon Rippey, Plaintiffs, v. DENVER UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association, Helen Bonfils Davis, and the Denver Post, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 66-C-359. United States District Court D. Colorado. October 16, 1967. *719

LOVE, District Judge. It is not our purpose to decide any question which is not in our view necessary to the determination of the case, and therefore we omit to decide the question of the validity of this mortgage under the bankrupt law. The question which we purpose to consider and decide is whether or not the mortgage in suit can, under the facts and circumstances established by the evidence, be sustained as against creditors at

BUTZNER, Circuit Judge. Soon after the Textile Workers Union won an election at Darlington Manufacturing Co., stockholders liquidated and dissolved the corporation. In Textile Workers Union of America v. Darlington Mfg. Co., 380 U.S. 263, 85 S.Ct. 994, 13 L.Ed.2d 827 (1965), the Court held that an employer does not engage in an unfair labor practice when he permanently closes his entire business, even if the liquidation is m

397 F.2d 760 DARLINGTON MANUFACTURING COMPANY; Deering Milliken & Co.,Inc., and Deering Milliken, Inc., Petitioners,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Textile WorkersUnion of America, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. No. 11554. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued Dec. 5, 1967.Decided May 31, 1968. <

325 F.2d 682 DARLINGTON MANUFACTURING COMPANY and Deering Milliken, Inc.,Petitioners,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.Textile Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, Intervenor.TEXTILE WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.Darlington Manufacturing Company and Deering Milliken, Inc.,Intervenors.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.DEER

11-126-cv Terra Firma Investments v. Citigroup 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 August Term 2012 5 (Argued: October 4, 2012 Decided: May 31, 2013) 6 Docket No. 11-126 7 -----------------------------------------------------x 8 TERRA FIRMA INVESTMENTS (GP) 2 LIMITED, TERRA FIRMA 9 INVESTMENTS (GP) 3 LIMITED, 10

600 F.2d 1148 In re BEEF INDUSTRY ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL DOCKET NO. 248.PONY CREEK CATTLE CO., INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,Musselman Ranch Co., etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants,v.The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO. et al., Defendants-Appellees.R. Dirk AGEE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.SAFEWAY STORES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.MEAT PRICE INVESTIGATORS ASSOCIATION, etc., et al

Greg N. Stivers, Chief Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (DN 6). The motion is ripe for decision. For the reasons provided below, the motion is GRANTED . I. BACKGROUND This is an action arising under the Sherman Antitrust Act ("the Sherman Act"),

JORDAN, Circuit Judge: Like a swallow returning to Capistrano, this antitrust case is before us again. In 2006, we ruled that Gulf States Reorganization Group had sufficiently alleged injury, and reversed the district court’s dismissal of its complaint against Nucor Corporation. See Gulf States Reorganization Group v. Nucor Corp., 466 F.3d 961, 967-68 (11th

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COSTAR GROUP, INC.; COSTAR No. 23-55662 REALTY INFORMATION, INC., D.C. No. Plaintiffs-counter- 2:20-cv-08819- defendants-Appellees, CBM-AS v. OPINION COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE EXCHANGE, INC., Defendant-counter-claimant- Appellant. A