Cases

544 F.3d 553 (2008) Nicole GARDNER, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sharon Ann Gardner, deceased as Assignee of Kevin Harper, Appellant v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY. No. 07-3051. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued May 13, 2008. Opinion Filed: July 22, 2008. *556 Jerome W. Kiger, A

850 A.2d 707 (2004) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Dave MACDONALD a/k/a David MacDonald, Kenneth Booth and Carol Booth Administrators of the Estate of Zachary Booth, Appellees. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 16, 2004. Filed May 11, 2004. *708 C. Leon Sherman, Pittsburgh, for appellant. Mi

OVERTON, Justice. We have for review Petersen v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 615 So.2d 181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), based on conflict with Grant v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 620 So.2d 778 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Based on our decision in Grant v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, 638 So.2d 936 (Fla.1994),

FARMER, Judge. The issue is whether the purposeful and deliberate act of striking another person in defense of oneself falls within the meaning of a homeowner’s insurance policy exclusion for bodily injury which is either expected or intended by an insured even if the actor did not intend to harm the person struck. In this case,.the altercation occurred at a social gathering at the insured’s house. Some good-natured banterin

Illinois Official Reports Supreme Court Bridgeview Health Care Center, Ltd. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 2014 IL 116389 Caption in Supreme BRIDGEVIEW HEALTH CARE CENTER, LTD., Appellant, v. Court: STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee. Docket No. 116389 Filed May 22, 20

FORNELLI, P.J., Presently before this court for disposition is the motion for summary judgment of plaintiff State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. The motion arises in the context of State Farm’s filing of a declaratory judgment action wherein State Farm seeks a determination of its obligation to defend and indemnify an individual whom it covered by a policy of homeowner’s insurance. Because this court agrees with t

PER CURIAM. The question presented in the instant appeal is whether coverage exists under appellee Johnson’s homeowners policy for injuries and damage arising out of the operation of Johnson’s Yamaha Wave Runner. The instant policy provides that personal liability coverage does not apply to bodily injury or property damage arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a watercraft “designated as an airboat, air cushio

PER CURIAM: John Bennett and others sued the United States pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. They alleged that the United States was negligent in controlling a forest fire that broke out in the Toiyabe National Forest, as a result of which they suffered damages. The district court denied the government’s motion for summary judgment, and this appeal ensued.

ORDER GRANTING UNITED CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND CANCEL-LINGHEARING THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge. In December 2012, a fire destroyed the house Plaintiffs were renting. Plaintiffs’ personal property was insured by two separate insurance policies: one with State Farm, the other with United Casualty Insurance. After investigating Plaintiffs’ claim for loss of persona

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT COLLIN KNIGHT, a Minor, By ) and Through His Next Friend, ) PAUL KNIGHT, ) Respondent,) ) v. ) WD82860 ) NELSON KNIGHT and VIOLET ) FILED: July 14, 2020 KNIGHT, ) Respondents, ) STATE FARM FIRE and )

PER CURIAM. Audio Applications, Inc. [“Audio”], the insured, sought coverage from its insurer, State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [“State Farm”], to defend Audio against an action brought in federal court in March of 1990 for injuries allegedly sustained by Lanier Worldwide [“Lanier”] as a result of a yellow page advertisement purchased in September of 1989 by Audio. It was alleged that the advertisement was offensive to Lanie

ORDER AND REASONS1 HELEN G. BERRIGAN, District Judge. Pending before the Court are two motions: a Motion to Remand this suit to the Civil District Court for the Parish of New Orleans (‘Motion to Remand’) filed by Christa Chaisson Maitland and Gulf Coast Flood, LLC (collectively ‘Plaintiffs’) and a Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by State Farm Fire

GLICKSTEIN, Judge. This appeal is from a final declaratory decree rendered by the trial court which found that a corporation, H.J. Zimmerman and Associates, Inc. (Zimmerman), was not an insured under a policy issued by appellee, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. We reverse and remand with direction to enter final declaratory judgment in favor of appellant, Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast.

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, as subrogee of Michael and Marilyn Kramer, commenced this action in this Court on January 20, 2011, asserting state-law claims of breach of express and implied warranties, negligent design, negligen

Stanley Wilhite appeals from the granting of summary judgment in favor of State *Page 23 Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company (State Farm). The facts show that Wilhite procured a homeowner's policy from State Farm and that during the term of the policy a Suzuki 50 CC four-wheel, off-road recreational vehicle was stolen from his home. State Farm denied coverage based on an exclusion in the policy. Wilhite filed suit in the District Court

COWART, Judge. This case involves the right of an insurance company which had issued a replacement fire policy to prorate loss with another insurance company which had issued the prior fire policy on the same property when the fire loss occurs after the first policy is cancelled but within the 10 day notification of cancellation period that the first company was required to give a mortgagee under a loss payable clause. <

HERSEY, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from an order dismissing with prejudice a petition for declaratory relief. The issue on appeal is the propriety of that dismissal, i.e., whether appellant, State Farm, was entitled to either an affirmative or negative declaration of its rights. Angelo Zepeda fell from scaffolding while installing drywall and was injured. He filed a complaint against All Phase Inte

961 A.2d 1080 (2008) Peter CHOHARIS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee. No. 06-CV-234. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued November 15, 2007. Decided December 18, 2008. *1082 Peter C. Choharis, pro se, with whom Paul Y. Kiyonaga was on the brief, Washington, for appellant.

507 F.Supp.2d 587 (2007) Kathleen SCHAFER, et al. v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO., et al. Civil Action No. 06-8262. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. August 22, 2007. *588 *589 James A. Watkins, Thomas Carey Wicker, III, Capitelli & Wicker, Brian David Katz, Joseph Edward C

PER CURIAM. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company appeals the deputy commissioner’s denial of its claim for reimbursement or indemnification. The deputy commissioner founded her denial of the claim upon the legal presumption that where two separate carriers have issued insurance policies to the same employer, it shall be presumed that only that policy with the later .effective date shall be in force.