Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL MCNEIL, guardian ad litem No. 17-35500 as to CLM; CLM, by and through Michael McNeil guardian ad litem; D.C. No. JULIE MCNEIL, individually, 3:15-cv-01098- Plaintiffs-Appellants, SB v. OPINION SHERWOOD SCHOOL DIS

MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS A. VARLAN, Chief Judge. This civil action is before the Court on defendant Tennessee Valley Authority’s (“TVA”) Motion for Summary Judgment on Count II (the NEPA Count) of the Second Amended Complaint [Doc. 129]. Plaintiffs filed a response [Doc. 139], and defendant replied [Doc. 147]. After careful consideration of the parties’ arguments, the record in this case, and t

PER CURIAM. This is an action to recover for engineering services performed by plaintiff. Defendant appeals *21from a judgment for plaintiff. The only issue in the case is whether the contracts to pay for plaintiff’s services were made so as to bind defendant personally or to bind only the corporations of which defendant was an officer and stockholder. The trial court he

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Michael Brown, Jr. was killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri on August 9, 2014. In the days that followed, large crowds gathered in Ferguson. While the crowds were largely peaceful, at times they became violent. This action concerns six sets of plaintiffs who allege multiple claims related to the police response to the demonstrations. The dist

May 12 2015 DA 14-0380 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 14-0380 2015 MT 127 JESSICA GAZELKA, Plaintiff, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee, v. ST. PETER’S HOSPITAL, Defendant, Appellee, and Cross-Appellant

The named defendant Peter Johl’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 57 Conn. App. 902 (AC 18463), is denied. David F. Sherwood, in opposition. Decided June 19, 2000

OPINION OF THE COURT JONES, Senior Judge: In accordance with his pleas of guilty, appellant was convicted of housebreaking, larceny, and wrongful appropriation in violation of Articles 130 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 930 and 921. We are reviewing the case pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ. The special court-martial convening authority (brigade commander) in an ap

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 573 (AC 23383), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs, owners in fee simple of a man-made, nonnavigable pond, cannot prohibit the abutting owners from entering onto the pond?” *910

William Alsup, United States District Judge For twenty years on the bench, I have tried to inform lawyers about the inherent ambiguity in a leading question premised on a negative, then ending in the word "correct?" or "right?" This motion perfectly illustrates the problem. At issue is the following question and answer during deposition testimony (Dkt. No. 142-5, Exh. 3, 162:5-7): Q: Because you didn't inte

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Northrop Grumman Mission Systems ) ASBCA No. 62596-ADR ) Under Contract No. W91QUZ-07-D-0005 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Thomas A. Lemmer, Esq. Joseph G. Martinez, Esq.

Opinion KATZ, J. The principal issue in this certified appeal1 is whether the owners of property abutting a man-made, *220nonnavigable pond have the right to use the pond for recreational purposes when the majority of the land beneath the pond is privately owned by another party. The plaintiffs, Ace Equipment Sal

ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/9/2015 2

826 F.Supp. 698 (1993) Mary WRENSEN, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, the New York City Police Department, Benjamin Ward, Helen Tanzosh and Stanley Edelman, Defendants. No. 89 Civ. 7080 (KTD). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 6, 1993. Gaffin & Mayo, P.C., New York City, Lauren B. Abramson, of counsel, for plaintiff. O. Peter Sherwood,

551 F.Supp.2d 871 (2007) In re NVE CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civil No. 06-574 (MJD/JJG). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. July 3, 2007. *877 Gregg M. Corwin, Gregg M. Corwin & Associates Law Office, PC, St. Louis Park, MN, and William B. Federman, Federman & Sherwood, Counsel for Plaintiffs. Peter W. Ca

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered January 18, 2013, to the extent it awards plaintiff damages as against defendant Thomas Calabro, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the judgment vacated. The Clerk is directed to dismiss the complaint as against Calabro. Plaintiff and defendants Bakhshi and Movtady agreed to extend the maturity dates of loans that defendant Calabro had agreed to gua

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered January 18, 2013, to the extent it awards plaintiff damages as against defendant Thomas Calabro, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the judgment vacated. The Clerk is directed to dismiss the complaint as against Calabro. Plaintiff and defendants Bakhshi and Movtady agreed to extend the maturity dates of loans that defendant Calabro had agreed to gua

876 F.Supp. 1013 (1995) Sherwood JAMES, Plaintiff, v. PROFESSIONALS' DETECTIVE AGENCY, INC. and William E. Craven, Defendants. No. 94 C 4115. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 24, 1995. Timothy Huizenga, Lawrence Davis Wood, Legal Assistance Foundation of Chicago, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. Peter R. Bulmer, Hopkins &

108 F.Supp.2d 968 (2000) THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc., New Jersey corporations, Plaintiffs, v. PANDUIT CORP., a Delaware corporation, and Jeffrey Wimmer, an individual, Defendants. No. 93 C 4017. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 1, 2000. *969 Stacey Lee Pra

73 N.Y.2d 944 (1989) In the Matter of Richard H. Whitehill, Appellant, v. New York State Teachers' Retirement System, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued February 11, 1989. Decided March 23, 1989. Thomas E. Brydges for appellant. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Julie S. Mereson, O. Peter Sherwood and P

72 N.Y.2d 965 (1988) In the Matter of James Watson, Appellant, v. Thomas A. Coughlin, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued September 9, 1988. Decided October 13, 1988. Lee A. Davis and David C. Leven for appellant. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General