Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Shipman v. Social Security Administration”
Shipman v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER HON. R. STEVEN WHALEN, U.S. Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Daniel Richard Shipman brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging a final decision of Defendant Commissioner denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under the Social Security Act. Both parties have filed summary judgment motions. For the reasons set for
White v. Social Security Administrationpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants the United States of America, the Social Security Administration (“SSA”), and Ryan Luis, ECF No. 15, and Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice, ECF No. 15-1. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion to dismiss and the request for judi
Shipman v. Robertspublic domain
*334 Opinion HARPER, J. The minor child, through his guardian ad litem,1 appeals from the judgment of the court affirming the decision of the family support magistrate granting the motion to modify the child support order brought by support enforcement services (support enforcement) on behalf of the defendant fathe
Shipman v. Bowenpublic domain
ORDER ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge. This is an action to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) which awarded the plaintiff disability insurance benefits for the period of time extending from May 2, 1984 until August 6, 1985. Jurisdiction is invoked under the Social Security Act as amended. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On the basis of the briefs and the administrative re
Shipman v. Missouri Department of Family Servicespublic domain
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Linden W. Shipman appeals from final judgments entered in the District Court1 for the Eastern District of Missouri. In appeal No. 88-1315 the district court held that Shipman’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging certain Missouri State Statutes is mooted by the subsequent amendment of the statutes and that Shipman lacks standing to challenge the 1984 enactments because n
Shipman v. Missouri Department Of Family Servicespublic domain
877 F.2d 678 Linden W. SHIPMAN, Individually and on behalf of otherssimilarly situated, Appellant,v.MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES; Joseph O'Hara,individually and as Director of Division of FamilyServices, Appellees. Nos. 88-1315, 88-1955. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1988.Decided June 12, 1989.Reh
Shipman v. Gladdenpublic domain
453 P.2d 921 (1969) Andrew E. SHIPMAN, Respondent, v. Clarence T. GLADDEN, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary, Appellant. Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. Argued and Submitted July 9, 1968. Decided April 30, 1969. *922 Helen B. Kalil, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Robert Y. Tho
872 F.2d 342 Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant,v.Jack COWLEY, Warden, of Joseph Harp's Correctional Center,et al., Respondent- Appellee.Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OFOKLAHOMA, Respondent.Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,v.Jack COWLEY, Warden; Unknown Named Warden of Jess DunnCorrectional Center; Gary Maynard
Bonilla-Bukhari v. Berryhillpublic domain
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Maribel Bonilla-Bukhari ("Bonilla-Bukhari") brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner") denying her claim for Supplemental Security Income and Di
Acevedo Ex Rel. J.A. v. Barnhartpublic domain
474 F.Supp.2d 1001 (2007) Jose ACEVEDO, on behalf of J.A., a minor, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 06-C-855. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. January 19, 2007. *1002 *1003 David F. Traver, Traver & Traver S
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBORAH BENTLEY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N22A-09-001 CEB ) A.I. DUPONT ) INSTITUTE & ) UNEMPLOYMENT ) INSURANCE APPEALS
Sherry Long v. State of Delawarepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY SHERRY LONG, ) ) Defendant-Below/Appellant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. CPU4-16-000917 ) STATE OF DELAWARE,
Thomas Sheppheard v. Patrick Morriseypublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6691 Doc: 54 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-6691 THOMAS SHEPPHEARD; TYLER RANDALL; ADAM PERRY, next friend and guardian of Minor child; J. P., on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly sit
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA23-44 Filed 05 September 2023 Wake County, No. 22CVS4866 B & D INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES, Petitioner, v. NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE, AND ITS AGENT ALLIANCE HEALTH, Respondent. Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 10 August 2022 by Judge Stephan R. Futrell in Wake County Superior Court. Heard
Cattau v. National Insurance Servicespublic domain
REILLY, J. ¶ 1. This case addresses federal preemption when a plaintiff has claimed damages in the form of tax consequences. Sixty-three former teachers and administrators (the Retirees) of the Neenah Joint School District filed this action alleging the District negligently represented that if they agreed to retire, they would receive ten years of payments under a 403(b)1 plan administered by the Dist
Waller v. Bankspublic domain
Cite as 2013 Ark. 399 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-11-403 Opinion Delivered October 10, 2013 ROMARIO VERMOND WALLER PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, 40LCV-10-112, HON. JODI RAINES v.
Clarke, ex rel v. Mikhailpublic domain
TYSON, Judge. *678 Timothy Clarke ("Plaintiff"), personal representative of the Estate of Erica Bohn, appeals from judgment entered by the trial court after a jury returned a verdict in favor of Ashraf Gad Bakhom Mikhail, M.D., Jessica Lyn Hardin, P.A., and Coastal Carolina Neuropsychiatric
Smith v. Longpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Stanley Paul Smith submitted a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). The district court1 denied Smith IFP status, he paid the filing fee, and the complaint was filed and is currently pending in the district court. We therefore dismiss this appeal as premature. See 8th Cir. R. *702
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc BEYOND HOUSING, INC. and ) Opinion issued September 13, 2022 PAGEDALE TOWN CENTER II, ) ) Respondents, ) v. ) No. SC99051 ) DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, )
Michael Kitchen v. Gretchen Whitmerpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0142p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MICHAEL ANDREW KITCHEN, │ Plaintiff-Appellee, │