Cases

04/09/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 1, 2019 SHIRLEY COLLINS ET AL. v. JOHN D. CARTER ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Greene County No. CC-16-CV-310 Alex E. Pearson, Judge ___________________________________

338 F.Supp.2d 1279 (2004) Shirley M. KISOR, Plaintiff, v. Olin M. COLLINS, Jr., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 04-AR-2323-M. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Middle Division. October 2, 2004. Philip E. Miles, Cusimano Keener Roberts, Kimberley & Miles, Gadsden, AL, for Shirley M. Kisor, plaintiff. Edgar M. Elliott, IV, Chirayu Madhu Shah, Chris

LAMAR, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Shirley Collins filed suit against Koppers, Inc., and several other defendants, alleging that she was injured as a result of environmental contamination by a wood-treatment facility. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss after Collins repeatedly failed to comply with a court order to provide expert opinions that causally linked her injuries to the alleged contamination.

2015 WI 2015 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP544 COMPLETE TITLE: The Bank of New York Mellon, fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-13, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petition

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Charlotte Kokocinski brought a shareholder derivative action on behalf of Med-tronic, Inc., against current and former directors and officers of Medtronic, and against Medtronic as a nominal defendant. The district court 1 dismissed the action on the basis of a report by a special litigation committee

02/07/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 21, 2023 Session KRISTINA COLLINS RAMSEY v. AUSTIN A. RAMSEY Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sevier County No. 20-9-173 Telford E. Forgety, Jr., Chancellor ___________________________________

Justice HANKINSON delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice ENOCH, Justice BAKER, and Justice O’NEILL joined. This cause arises out of an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a motion for summary judgment by a professional school-district employee based on immunity under section 22.051 of the Education Code. See Tex. Eduo.Code § 22.051(a)

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00311-CV Robert K. Trethewey and Shirley J. Trethewey, Appellants v. Suzy Collins, et al., Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C2006-0613B, HONORABLE CHARLES A. STEPHENS II, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00311-CV Robert K. Trethewey and Shirley J. Trethewey, Appellants v.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2009-CA-01678-SCT SHIRLEY JEAN COLLINS v. KOPPERS, INC. f/k/a KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INC., BEAZER EAST, INC. f/k/a BEAZER MATERIAL AND SERVICES, HANSON, PLC, HANSON BUILDING MATERIAL LIMITED f/k/a HANSON, PLC, HANSON HOLDINGS LIMITED, HANSON HOLDINGS BASALT, INC., HANSON HOLDINGS ARAGONITE, INC., HBMA HOLDING, INC. AND THREE RIVERS MANAGEMENT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/09/2009 TRIAL JUDGE: H

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED SHIRLEY A. HERRON, June 8, 2017 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK Claimant Below, Petitioner SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: A disabled Louisiana inmate sued several of his doctors and jailers, claiming they were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical condition in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. The district court held perfunctorily that there was a genuine issue of material fact and denied qualified immunity, reje

93 B.R. 251 (1988) In the Matter of William G. BASKERVILLE and Shirley A. Baskerville, Debtors. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF FORT COLLINS, N.A., Applicant/Appellee, v. William G. BASKERVILLE and Shirley A. Baskerville, Respondents/Appellants. No. 87-C-716, Bankruptcy No. 87 B 1855 C. United States District Court, D. Colorado. November 3, 1988. Stephen J. Jouard, Fis

ACCEPTED 04-15-00507-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (O. Bellantoni, J.), entered January 17, 2008, as granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Guy Shirley, Euralyn Shirley, and Sophia Shirley which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them. O

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00689-CV Shirley McDonald, Appellant v. Transco, Inc. and McLane Company, Inc., Appellees FROM THE 169TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 21DCV328493, THE HONORABLE CARI L. STARRITT-BURNETT, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON MOTION FOR REHEARING NO. 03-22-00689-CV Shirley McDonald, Appellant v. Transco, Inc. and McLane Company, Inc., Appellees FROM THE 169TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 21DCV328493, THE HONORABLE CARI L. STARRITT-BURNETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00087-CV ESTATE of Shirley L. BENSON, Deceased From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 155,572 & 155,572-A Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Jud

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-0011 Filed September 14, 2016 BERNARD J. WIHLM and PATRICIA M. BALEK, Plaintiffs-Appellees, CLERK OF SUPREME COURT vs. SHIRLEY A. CAMPBELL, individually,

OPINION OF THE COURT Kane, J. P. The issue to be resolved on this appeal is whether the term “legal resident” means “domicile” for the purpose of a scholar incentive award. The State of New York seeks to recover the sum of $1,200 from defendant. Two scholar incentive awards of $600 each were made to him by the New York State Education Department for the academic years 1972-1973 and 197