Cases

RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge: After Tremain Spivey was sexually assaulted by a fellow classmate at the residential school which he attended, this ease was filed against two officials of the school. Spivey appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the school officials. The district court held that defendants had qualified immunity because the plaintiff failed to state a violation of a constitut

ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION Before HATCHETT and COX, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge. RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge: In this 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 action against two officials of the state-operated residential school for the hearing impaired where an eight-year-old plaintiff was sexually assaulted by a

HUNTER, Judge. Hercules Cole and Celestine Cole ("plaintiffs") appeal from an order entered 14 April 2004 denying plaintiffs' counsel's Motion for Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice and granting defendants' motion for sanctions and attorneys' fees. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Plaintiffs hired Waverly W. Jones ("Jones") in October 2003 to represent them in an a

HUNTER, Judge. Hercules Cole and Celestine Cole (“plaintiffs”) appeal from an order entered 14 April 2004 denying plaintiffs’ counsel’s Motion for Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice and granting defendants’ motion for sanctions and attorneys’ fees. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Plaintiffs hired Waverly W. Jones (“Jones”) in October 2003 to represent the

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Shirley A. Williams appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas in favor of her employer Little Rock Municipal Water Works (Water Works). 155 F.R.D. 188. The district court granted Water Works’ motion for summary judgment and

636 P.2d 518 (1981) Mark D. SPIVEY, Appellant (Complainant-Respondent), Wyoming Fair Employment Commission (Respondent), v. LUCKY MC URANIUM CORPORATION, Appellee (Petitioner). No. 5520. Supreme Court of Wyoming. November 20, 1981. *519 E. James Burke and Thomas E. Campbell (argued), of Hanes, Gage & Burke, P.C., Cheyenne

PER CURIAM: Petitioner, Shirley Tyler, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at the Middle Georgia Correctional Institute in Hardwick, Georgia, was convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of her husband, James Tyler. After exhausting her state remedies she filed a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U

ZACHARY, Judge. Michael Barbour (defendant) appeals from the judgments entered upon his convictions of rape of a child, sex offense against a child, and two charges of taking indecent liberties with a child, with all offenses alleged to have been committed against the minor victim, "Rachel."1 On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred by allowing witnesses to vouch for Rachel's credibility, b

ORDER MARY S. SCRIVEN, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. McCoun III on June 20, 2014 (Dkt. 142). The Report and Recommendation recommends that Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 98) be granted in part and denied in part, and that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. (dissenting). ¶ 36 "All work performed will be ... insured." This language is on the first page of the contract between Cintas and Becker, in bold type. A reasonable person reading this contract language would think that it means what it says. But not the majority. In the majority's view, this unequivocal language is transformed to mean only that Cintas "carries an insurance policy." Majority op., ¶ 27.

78 F.Supp.2d 543 (1999) State of LOUISIANA, et al. v. BRASELMAN CORPORATION, et al. No. Civ.A.96-0862 CW. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. February 10, 1999. *544 Richard Gladstein, Aimee Jimenez, Michael Donnellan, Environmental Enforcement Section, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, James L. Turner, U.S. Enviro

453 F.Supp.2d 928 (2006) LOCKWOOD BROTHERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD SPEDITIONS GMBH, and Ziemann Ludwigsburg GmbH, Defendants. Action No. 4:06cv61. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Newport News Division. September 18, 2006. *929 *930 Richard Johan Conrod, Jr., William Edgar

262 F.3d 295 (4th Cir. 2001) MARGARET GILCHRIST; JOHN BROWN; GLORIA RENEW; MARTHA GRIFFIN; ESTRELLA D. ARD; GRANT L. COBB; MANUEL HOUSE; CLIFFORD GRIFFIN; MARY E. MOORE; MARSHALL KITCHENS; DANIEL A. BEARD; LINDA FISHBURN; LILLIE M. SAMUELS; DELORES A. WILLIAMS; CORAL L. HYDE; PATRICIA GRUBBS; BRENDA BEAL; ANNETTE E. IRBY; RUBY H. MCCULLOUGH; BRENDA BUSH; JOSIE M. HEARST; TUYET T. PARHAM; CORINE P. ROBBIN; ADA S. SPIVEY; NGUYEN THU YOUNG; THOMASENIA

654 S.E.2d 7 (2007) HODGSON CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff v. Ronald Wallace HOWARD and wife, Shirley Ann Howard, Defendants. No. COA06-1414. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 4, 2007. Vannoy, Colvard, Triplett & Vannoy, P.L.L.C., by Daniel S. Johnson, North Wilkesboro, for plaintiff-appellant. McElwee Firm, P.L.L.C., by John M. Logsdon, North W

146 S.W.3d 580 (2004) Peggy BAILEY, et al. v. Dr. John J. TASKER. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section, at Knoxville. February 4, 2004 Session. March 17, 2004. Permission to Appeal Denied October 4, 2004. *581 Richard A. Spivey, Kingsport, Tennessee, for the appellants, Peggy Bailey and Gary Bailey.

298 S.C. 530 (1989) 381 S.E.2d 913 William A. NASH, Appellant v. Shirley R. BYRD, Respondent. 1356 Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard March 20, 1989. Decided June 12, 1989. *531 H. Michael Spivey, Mauldin, for appellant. Robert M. Rosenfled, Greenville, <

96 F.3d 114 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; L. Douglas Wilder, Governor ofthe Commonwealth of Virginia; Virginia Military Institute;Joseph M. Spivey, III, President of the Virginia MilitaryInstitute Board of Visitors; John Williams Knapp,Superintendent of Virginia Military Institute; The Board ofVisitors of Virginia Military Institute; Thomas N. Downing;Elizabeth P. Hoi

Justice BRADY concurring. A prosecutor’s representations to a court or trier of fact should be accurate, trustworthy, and based upon a good faith understanding of the law and facts of a particular case. I write separately to emphasize the special responsibility of North Carolina prosecutors to promote justice and fair play in the criminal courts. I believe that portions of the prosecutor’s closing argument i

Justice BRADY concurring. A prosecutor's representations to a court or trier of fact should be accurate, trustworthy, and based upon a good faith understanding of the law and facts of a particular case. I write separately to emphasize the special responsibility of North Carolina prosecutors to promote justice and fair play in thecriminal courts. I believe that portions of the prosecutor's closing argument in this case misrepr

256 S.W.3d 869 (2008) UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, et al., Appellants v. Jack LOFTIN, et al., Appellees. No. 09-08-061 CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted on June 6, 2008. Decided June 12, 2008. *871 Tynan Buthod, Elizabeth Baker, Baker Botts L.L.P., Stephen C. Dillard, Brett Young, Fulbright & J