Cases

ORDER Per Curiam: Mr. Damon Simpson appeals the motion court’s judgment denying a Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to permit him to testify at trial. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

692 So.2d 635 (1997) Thomas E. MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RED SIMPSON, INC. and Travelers Insurance Co., Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-1177. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 12, 1997. John Taylor Bennett, Marksville, Lonny E. Guidroz, Livonia, for Thomas E. Martin. Steven J. Bienvenu, Opelousas, for Red Simpson, Inc., et al. Befor

Order PER CURIAM: Michael Simpson appeals his conviction for the class B misdemeanor of driving while intoxicated, section 577.010. Simpson argues that the trial court plainly erred in overruling his objection to a statement made by the prosecutor during closing argument in that the statement constituted an impermissible comment on Simpson’s decision not to testify and misstated the evidence. We affirm. R

649 So.2d 1155 (1995) Thomas E. MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RED SIMPSON, INC., and Travelers Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-817. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 1, 1995. *1156 John Taylor Bennett, for Thomas E. Martin. Steven J. Bienvenu, for Red Simpson, Inc. et al. Before

342 S.W.3d 923 (2011) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Damon SIMPSON, Appellant. No. WD 72056. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. June 28, 2011. Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. Befo

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John David Simpson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. <

624 F.3d 781 (2010) Curtis ROBERTSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tom SIMPSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 07-6191. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. November 12, 2010. ON BRIEF: Matthew M. Robinson, Robinson & Brandt, PSC, Covington, Kentucky, *782 for Appellant. Todd D. Ferguson, Office of the Kentucky Attorn

HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part, concurring in part. I concur in the majority opinion except with regard to the June 16th statement. I would grant habeas relief as to this statement as well. I agree with the majority that when Simpson made the statement, “Mmmmmmmm. I ain’t done — nah—I messed up last time I did that,” giving two variation

SHAWN A. WOMACK, Associate Justice Randy Zook, petitioner, challenges the sufficiency of the signatures certified by the respondent, the Honorable Mark Martin, Arkansas Secretary of State, in the statewide initiative ballot petition entitled "Arkansas Term Limits Amendment," which is on the November 6, 2018 ballot. The intervenor, Arkansas Term Limits, sponsored the petition. This court addresses the second issue raised in the orig

315 S.W.3d 779 (2010) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony D. SIMPSON, Appellant. No. WD 70208. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. July 27, 2010. *780 Ruth Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang and Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before Divisio

PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge Nathan D. Martin was convicted by the Pulaski County Circuit Court of failing to register as a sex offender after he failed to verify his address as required. On appeal, he challenges the trial court's admission of docket sheets from a North Carolina court as proof he was required to register, claiming the documents were hearsay and improperly authenticated. He also challenges the sufficiency of the evide

673 S.E.2d 149 (2009) Scott CHAISSON, Employee, Plaintiff, v. Red SIMPSON, Employer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants. No. COA08-704. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 3, 2009. *153 The Jernigan Law Firm, by Leonard T. Jernigan, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee. Hedrick, Gardner, Kinche

603 F.Supp.2d 960 (2009) David Eugene MATTHEWS, Petitioner v. Thomas L. SIMPSON, Warden, Respondent. Civil Action No. 3:99CV-P91-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville. March 17, 2009. *964 Alan M. Freedman, Midwest Center for Justice, Ltd., Evanston, IL, Susan M.J. Martin, East Brunswick, NJ, for Petitione

Judgment PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R.86

CLIFF HOOFMAN, Associate Justice. |T This case involves two questions of Arkansas law certified to this court by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas in accordance with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-8 (2013). On January 23, 2014, this court accepted the certified questions in Simpson v. Calvary, 2014 Ark. 33, 431 S.W.3d 29

653 S.E.2d 249 (2007) STATE of North Carolina v. Ronald Allen SIMPSON. No. COA07-445. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 4, 2007. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Michael E. Casterline, Asheville, for defendant-appellant. MARTIN, Chief Judge. On 27 September 2005, defendant w

MARTIN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which GRIFFIN, J., joined. COOK, J. (pp. 581-88), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. Warden Thomas L. Simpson appeals from a district court judgment granting in part Robert Keith Woodall’s petition for a *577writ of habeas corpu

WATTS, J. This appeal stems from an order of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County affirming the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s (the “Commission”) denial of a Petition to Reopen1 appellant Martin McLaughlin’s workers’ compensation claim. Appellant noted an appeal raising one issue, which we rephrase:2

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Henry W. Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous order denying relief on Martin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

627 S.E.2d 271 (2006) STATE of North Carolina v. Nathaniel Lee SIMPSON, Defendant. No. COA05-632. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 21, 2006. Attorney General Roy Cooper, III, by Assistant Attorney General Kathleen U. Baldwin and Assistant Attorney General Robert C. Montgomery, for the State. M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill, for defendant-appel