Cases

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiff Karen Anne Miller (“Miller” or the “Plaintiff’) seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) that she was not disabled during the relevant time periods and, therefore, she was not entitled to disability benefits on her own earnings record or disabled widows’ benefits as provided for in T

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Brian Shaw v. Civil No. 19-cv-730-LM Opinion No. 2020 DNH 100 Andrew Saul1, Commissioner, U.S. Social Security Administration O R D E R Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Brian Shaw seeks judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denyin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Samuel Brooks v. Civil No. 19-cv-1060-LM Opinion No. 2020 DNH 105 Andrew Saul, Commissioner, U.S. Social Security Administration O R D E R Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Samuel Brooks seeks judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administr

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 02-1515 LINDA SIMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Cou

MANION, Circuit Judge. Linda Sims appeals from the district court’s order upholding the denial of her applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”). Sims contends that the decision by the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) is not supported by substantial evidence because the ALJ ignored or misstated significant medical findings in the

475 F.Supp.2d 716 (2007) David D'ANGELO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 1:05-CV-004. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. January 22, 2007. *717 James R. Rinck, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff. Ronald M. Stella, U.S. Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI, for Defendant.

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: The disability programs administered under the Social Security Act "are of a size and extent difficult to comprehend." Richardson v. Perales , 402 U.S. 389 , 399,

ORDER James P. Jones applied for disability benefits, claiming that herniated discs and a pinched nerve caused him severe back and leg pain and prevented him from working. After the Social Security Administration denied his application, Jones requested a hearing before an administrative law judge, who concluded that Jones *383was not disabled. The ALJ’s decision became the fina

329 F.Supp.2d 1272 (2004) Harold S. SMALL, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 02-G-0583-M. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Middle Division. August 18, 2004. *1273 Myron K Allenstein, Allenstein & Associates, Gadsden, AL, for Harold Small, plaintiff. Ali

ORDER THAT: (1) THE ALJ’S NON-DISABILITY FINDING IS NOT SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND IS REVERSED; (2) JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AWARDING BENEFITS; AND (3) THIS CASE IS CLOSED TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge. This is a Social Security disability benefits appeal. At issue is whether the administrative law judge (the “ALJ”) erred in finding the Plaintiff “not disabled” and therefor

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge. Claimant Peter Kadelak (“Claimant”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking reversal or remand of the decision by Defendant Michael J. As-true, Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”), denying Claimant’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). In response, the Defendant f

Justice Stevens,, concurring in part and concurring in the result. Members of the Abenaki Indian Tribe are unquestionably entitled to the same constitutional protection against governmental action “prohibiting the free exercise” of their religion as are the adherents of other faiths.1 Our respect for the sincerity of their religious beliefs does not, however, relieve us from the

ORDER EARL EL CARROLL, District Judge. This is an action for judicial review of a denial of disability benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The matter is fully briefed (Doc. 31 & 33). Plaintiff did not file a reply brief. Plaintiff applied for disability benefits on January 13, 2006 (Administrative Record [Tr.]) at approximately years of age, alleging an onset of

570 F.Supp.2d 708 (2007) Darlene JONES, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE,[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-1778. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 25, 2007. October 15, 2007. *710 Michael Patrick Boyle, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. Ed

BERZON, Circuit Judge: The Commissioner of Social Security determined that Nadine Reed is not entitled to disability benefits or supplemental security income. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner on Reed’s challenge to that decision, and Reed appeals. We find that the Administrative Law Judge rejected for an improper reason Reed’s request for

Rex v . SSA 07-CV-048-SM 03/31/09 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Melissa Rex, on behalf of her daughter, A.R., Claimant v. Civil N o . 07-cv-48-SM Opinion N o . 2009 DNH 042 Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Respondent O R D E R By prior o

285 F.Supp.2d 827 (2002) Bertha BARFIELD, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART,[1] Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. CIV.A. H-02-0026. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. August 8, 2002. *828 William C Herren, Herren Law Office, Houston, for Bertha Barfield, plaintiff.<

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Robert J. Quinn, Jr. (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) and seeks review of the final decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), denying Plaintiffs application for disability benefits. (Dkt. 1). Plai

772 F.Supp.2d 608 (2011) Gabrielle T. FREELS, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civ. No. 09-947-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 25, 2011. *611 Stephen A. Hampton of the Grady & Hampton Law Firm, Dover, DE, for Plaintiff. Patricia Anne Stewart of the Socia

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JORGE A. SOLIS, District Judge. The United States Magistrate Judge has issued Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation (“FCR”) in this case. No one has filed any objection to the FCR. After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72, the Court