Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 22-1073 September Term, 2023 EPA-87FR24300 EPA-87FR34873

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 3, 2023 Decided May 14, 2024 No. 22-1210 SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY LLC AND SINCLAIR CASPER REFINING COMPANY LLC, APPELLANTS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, APPELLEE AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolid

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 16, 2024 Decided July 26, 2024 Reissued August 14, 2024 No. 22-1073 SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY LLC AND SINCLAIR CASPER REFINING COMPANY LLC, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT AMERICAN COALITION FOR ET

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 19, 2023 Decided July 18, 2023 No. 22-1015 WYNNEWOOD REFINING COMPANY, LLC AND COFFEYVILLE RESOURCES REFINING & MARKETING, LLC, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 22-1051, 22-1053 On Petitions for Review of

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 605 U. S. Part 2 Pages 627–664 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 18, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

ORDER This matter comes on for consideration of the-Petitioners’ Unopposed Motion to Clarify the Court’s Opinion. The motion is construed as a petition for rehearing. See Fed. R. App. P. 2 (“On its own or a party’s motion, a court of appeals may - to expedite its decision or for other good cause - suspend any provision of these rules in a particular

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 6, 2026 Decided April 7, 2026 No. 25-1187 ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC., PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 25-1197 On Petitions for Review of a Final Action of the Environm

Appellate Case: 19-9612 Document: 010110754199 Date Filed: 10/17/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 17, 2022

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 1, 2024 Decided June 20, 2025 No. 23-1177 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 23-1240, 23-1243, 23-1246, 2

USCA11 Case: 22-11617 Document: 118-1 Date Filed: 01/11/2024 Page: 1 of 17 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11617 ____________________ HUNT REFINING COMPANY,

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 24, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Cle

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 25, 2024 Decided July 19, 2024 No. 23-1248 COALITION FOR RENEWABLE NATURAL GAS, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, ET AL., INTERVENORS On Petition f

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

LUCERO, J., dissenting. My majority colleagues predicate their opinion on the premise that the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has impermissibly adopted a test under which a refinery can demonstrate disproportionate economic hardship only upon a showing of an existential threat to ongoing operations. Whether that presumed test would pass muster may present an interesting question, but it is quite academic to the

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH March 15, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AGEE, Circuit Judge: Until 2011, Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. enjoyed an exemption as a small refinery from the Environmental Protection Agency's renewable fuel standard program, which requires refineries and other facilities to allocate a certain percentage of their fuel production to renewable fuels. When Ergon filed for an extension of the small refinery exemption, the EPA denied its pe

Appellate Case: 21-9572 Document: 010110819629 Date Filed: 03/01/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH March 1, 2023 U

Appellate Case: 25-1078 Document: 83-1 Date Filed: 07/20/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 20, 2026

Appellate Case: 24-6063 Document: 010111079171 Date Filed: 07/15/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 15, 2024