⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Slater Park, LLC”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011-11-30 · Published · cited 0× · 80 So. 3d 347; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19059; 2011 WL 5965809
80 So.3d 347 (2011) AVALONS ASSISTED LIVING, LLC d/b/a Avalon's Assisted Living and d/b/a Avalon's Assisted Living at Avalon Park, and Avalon's Assisted Living II, LLC d/b/a Avalon's Assisted Living at Southmeadow, Appellant, v. AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Appellee. No. 1D11-1411. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. November 30, 2011.
District Court, D. Oregon · 2011-10-20 · Published · cited 4× · 868 F. Supp. 2d 1042; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123803; 2011 WL 5141505
OPINION AND ORDER AIKEN, Chief Judge: Defendant and counter-claimant Lucile Slater Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford moves for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, on plaintiffs claim for declaratory judgment and on its eighth counterclaim. Plaintiff DCIPA, LLC filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on its claim for declaratory judgment and on all of defendan
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-11-08 · Published · cited 1× · 229 So. 3d 1259
WOLF, J. Appellant, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, challenges an order of an Administrative Law Judge from the Division of Administrative Hearings concluding that the Division’s notice of intent to repeal Florida Rules of Administrative Procedure 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) was an invalid e
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-04-23 · Published · cited 36× · 888 F.3d 418
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NARUTO, a Crested Macaque, by and No. 16-15469 through his Next Friends, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, D.C. No. Inc., 3:15-cv-04324- Plaintiff-Appellant, WHO v. OPINION DAVID JO
United States Court of International Trade · 2010-04-19 · Published · cited 5× · 703 F. Supp. 2d 1336; 34 Ct. Int'l Trade 438; 34 C.I.T. 438; 32 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1417; 2010 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 41
703 F.Supp.2d 1336 (2010) EAST SEA SEAFOODS LLC, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Catfish Farmers of America, Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 10-42. Court No. 10-00102. United States Court of International Trade. April 19, 2010. *1338 Arent Fox LLP (John M. Gurley, Diana Dimitriuc-Quaia, Matthew L. Kanna, Nancy Aile
District Court, N.D. New York · 2005-06-22 · Published · cited 8× · 374 F. Supp. 2d 243; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12255; 2005 WL 1484506
374 F.Supp.2d 243 (2005) STEWART PARK AND RESERVE COALITION INCORPORATED (SPARC); Orange County Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs, Inc.; and Sierra Club, Plaintiffs, v. Rodney E. SLATER, as United States Secretary of Transportation; United States Department of Transportation; Kenneth R. Wykle, as Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration; Harold J. Brown, as New York Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration; Federal Hi
United States Court of International Trade · 2010-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 714 F. Supp. 2d 1243; 34 Ct. Int'l Trade 652; 34 C.I.T. 652; 32 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1589; 2010 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 63
714 F.Supp.2d 1243 (2010) EAST SEA SEAFOODS LLC, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Catfish Farmers of America, Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 10-62, Court No. 10-001020. United States Court of International Trade. May 27, 2010. *1244 Arent Fox LLP (John M. Gurley, Nancy Aileen Noonan, Diana Dimitriuc Quaia, Matthew
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2017-05-12 · Published · cited 0× · 260 F. Supp. 3d 988
OPINION AND ORDER JON E. DEGUILIO, Judge This case arises under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. Plaintiffs Valbruna Slater Steel Corporation and Fort Wayne Steel Corporation (collectively Valbruna) filed a cost recovery claim under § 107(a). Defendants Joslyn Manufacturing Company, Joslyn Corporation and Joslyn Manufac
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023-12-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT EARLENE CHARLES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) WD85571 ) OAK PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ) Opinion filed: December, 12, 2023 ASSOCIATION
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013-11-21 · Published · cited 8× · 504 B.R. 321
Chapter 11 MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINT SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND.. .330 I. The Debtors and the Commencement of the Bankruptcy Cases... 330 II. The LightSquared LP Credit Agreement. . .330 III. The Defendants...
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009-03-30 · Published · cited 26× · 613 F. Supp. 2d 653; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27188; 2009 WL 839358
613 F.Supp.2d 653 (2009) Cheryl A. SLATER, Plaintiff, v. SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-2304. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. March 30, 2009. *656 Peter G. Loftus, Loftus Law Firm, P.C., Waverly, PA, for Plaintiff. *657 Michael J. Donoh
Cantrell v. Whitepublic domain
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016-04-05 · Published · cited 0× · 178 F. Supp. 3d 1308; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45751; 2016 WL 1320813
OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., United States District Judge This is a civil rights action. It is before the Court on the Defendant Wesley White’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 102] and the Defendant the City of College Park’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 103]. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant Wesley White’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 102] is DENIED and the Defend
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019-03-31 · Published · cited 39× · 381 F. Supp. 3d 853
Denise Page Hood, Chief Judge I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background On January 10, 2018, Plaintiffs Len Gamboa, Jeff Retmier, Nikiah Nudell, David Bates, Pete Petersen, and William Sparks, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals (collectively, "Plaintiffs" or the "Gamboa Plaintiffs"), commenced this action (the "Gamboa Action") agai
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005-07-05 · Published · cited 47× · 413 F.3d 451; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13317
413 F.3d 451 WHITE TAIL PARK, INCORPORATED; American Association for Nude Recreation-Eastern Region, Incorporated; K.H.; D.H., on behalf of themselves and their minor children, I.P. and B.P.; S.B.; J.B., on behalf of themselves and their minor child, C.B.; T.S.; J.S., on behalf of themselves and their minor children, T.J.S. and M.S., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Robert B. STROUBE, in his official capacity as Virginia State Health Commissioner, D
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005-07-05 · Published · cited 190× · 413 F.3d 451; 2005 WL 1554600
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge DUNCAN and Judge STAMP joined. OPINION TRAXLER, Circuit Judge. The American Association for Nude Recreation-Eastern Region, Inc. (“AANR-East”), White Tail Park, Inc. (‘White Tail”), and six individual plaintiffs
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017-03-22 · Published · cited 0× · 244 F. Supp. 3d 657; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41383
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER JOHN R. ADAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendant Air Enterprises, LLC’s (“Air En*658terprises”) motion for summary, judgment on Plaintiff Gene Charles’ (“Mr, Charles”) claim of retaliation in violation of the Family and .Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). For the reasons that follow, Air Ent
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-06-06 · Published · cited 3× · 139 F.4th 576
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0150p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JASON COUNTS; DONALD KLEIN; OSCAR ZAMORA; │ JASON SILVE
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2025-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 COA 74
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
North Carolina Business Court · 2020-04-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 NCBC 27
Pender Farm Dev., LLC v. NDCO, LLC, 2020 NCBC 27. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION PENDER COUNTY 17 CVS 446 PENDER FARM DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. NDCO, LLC, ORDER AND OPINION ON CROSS-
District Court, S.D. California · 2014-02-04 · Published · cited 2× · 505 B.R. 289
ORDER HAYES, District Judge. The matter before the Court is the appeal of the “Order Converting Case to One Under Chapter 7” (“Order Converting Case”), issued by the Bankruptcy Court on October 4, 2013. (ECF No. 1). I. Background This is the third appeal to this Court in this bankruptcy proceeding. See In re YBA Nineteen, S.D. Cal. Case No. 13cv1326-WQH-RBB