⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Small v. Small”

Small v. Smallpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2024-11-29 · Published · cited 1× · 561 P.3d 701; 2024 UT App 173
2024 UT App 173 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS NATHAN DALE SMALL, Appellant, v. TRISHA DAWN SMALL, Appellee. Opinion No. 20230487-CA Filed November 29, 2024 First District Court, Brigham City Department The Honorable Spencer D. Wal
Small v. Smallpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 251 So. 3d 101
Affirmed.
Small v. Smallpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2007-02-01 · Published · cited 23× · 216 S.W.3d 872; 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 725; 2007 WL 273909
216 S.W.3d 872 (2007) Wayne and Linda SMALL, Appellant, v. Shana SMALL, Appellee. No. 09-06-123 CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted October 19, 2006. Decided February 1, 2007. *875 Catherine A. Palmore, Gauntt & Kruppstadt, LLP, The Woodlands, for appellant. Kenna M. Seiler, Hope & C
Small v. Smallpublic domain
Virginia Circuit Court · 2001-12-21 · Published · cited 0× · 58 Va. Cir. 114; 2001 Va. Cir. LEXIS 361
By Judge Arthur B. Vieregg On Wednesday, December 5, the parties appeared and tried Mrs. Small’s rule for Mr. Small to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for his failure to make monthly spousal support payments pursuant to a 1994 pendente lite decree entered in the parties’ pending 1993 divorce suit, Small v. Small, Chancery No. 132802 (“Suit One”).1
Small v. Smallpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996-05-31 · Published · cited 4× · 227 A.D.2d 949; 643 N.Y.S.2d 842; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6873
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support a finding of cruel and inhuman treatment (see, Reck v Reck, 149 AD2d 934). We further conclude that Supreme Court properly refused to award defendant a share of plaintiff's enhanced earning capacity resulting from the nursing degree earned by plaintiff during the marriage (see, McAlpine v McAlpine,
People v. Smallpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-06-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 03828
People v Small (2025 NY Slip Op 03828) People v Small 2025 NY Slip Op 03828 Decided on June 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected
State v. Smallpublic domain
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024-04-03 · Published · cited 0× · 320 A.3d 635; 2024 N.H. 15
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by email at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet
Hillestad v. Smallpublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023-10-11 · Published · cited 3× · 2023 ND 195
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 11, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT
People v. Smallpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 NY Slip Op 03521
People v Small (2023 NY Slip Op 03521) People v Small 2023 NY Slip Op 03521 Decided on June 29, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Hillestad v. Smallpublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023-10-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 ND 195
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 11, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT
Small v. Smallpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992-09-15 · Published · cited 0× · 107 N.C. App. 474; 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 737; 420 S.E.2d 678
HEDRICK, Chief Judge. In Paradise Lost John Milton described Hell as “confusion worst confounded.” This proceeding, we dare not call it a case or a cause, has confused and confounded the parties, the lawyers and the trial judge. Now it confounds us. Despite the obviously well intentioned efforts of the trial lawyers and the trial court, the focus of this legal proceeding has become lost within the complex details of t
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-02-09 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JENNIFER SMALL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.
State v. Smallpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-03-04 · Published · cited 3× · 2022 Ohio 636
[Cite as State v. Small, 2022-Ohio-636.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 2021-CA-30 : v.
State v. Smallpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 207 Conn. App. 349
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
People v. Smallpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-10-26 · Published · cited 2× · 176 N.Y.S.3d 347; 209 A.D.3d 1043; 2022 NY Slip Op 06017
People v Small (2022 NY Slip Op 06017) People v Small 2022 NY Slip Op 06017 Decided on October 26, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
People v. Smallpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-01-11 · Published · cited 0× · 212 A.D.3d 655; 179 N.Y.S.3d 608; 2023 NY Slip Op 00111
People v Small (2023 NY Slip Op 00111) People v Small 2023 NY Slip Op 00111 Decided on January 11, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Yezzi v. Smallpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-06-30 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 NY Slip Op 04198
Yezzi v Small (2022 NY Slip Op 04198) Yezzi v Small 2022 NY Slip Op 04198 Decided on June 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2025-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KISOR, ATTANASIO, and HARRELL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Stefon M. SMALL Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 97 EAL 2024 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-01-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 423 MAL 2023 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :