⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Smith v. Berryhill (CONSENT)”

McGee v. Berryhillpublic domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 2018-12-18 · Published · cited 2× · 354 F. Supp. 3d 304
LESLIE G. FOSCHIO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION On February 14, 2017, the parties consented, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to proceed before the undersigned. (Dkt. No. 18). The court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to
Edley v. Berryhillpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-07-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) MICHELLE EDLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-1553 (RBW)
Probst v. Berryhillpublic domain
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019-03-22 · Published · cited 2× · 377 F. Supp. 3d 578
James E. Gates, United States Magistrate Judge In this action, plaintiff Lisa Probst ("plaintiff" or, in context, "claimant") challenges the final decision of defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security Nancy Berryhill ("Commissioner") denying her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits ("DIB") on the grounds that she is not disabled. The case is before the court on the parties' motions for judg
Kenner v. Berryhillpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-07-31 · Published · cited 5× · 316 F. Supp. 3d 530
DEBORAH A. ROBINSON, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff, Annette M. Kenner, pursuant to Section 405(g) of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq., seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Defendant denying her application for disability insurance benefits.
Allen v. Berryhillpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018-08-10 · Published · cited 0× · 333 F. Supp. 3d 1280
T. MICHAEL PUTNAM, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *1283The plaintiff, Shaula Lanear Allen, individually and as representative payee and on behalf of J.L.,1 appeals from the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") finding that she and J.L. received an overpayment based u
Webb v. Berryhillpublic domain
United States District Court · 2018-03-05 · Published · cited 12× · 294 F. Supp. 3d 824
VERONICA L. DUFFY, United States Magistrate Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...831 FACTS...831 A. Procedural History...831 B. Work History...833 C. Ms. Webb's Statements and Testimony...833 D. Medical Evidence-Chronological...841 E. Medical Literature...867 F. Opinion Evidence..
District Court, W.D. New York · 2018-04-11 · Published · cited 10× · 305 F. Supp. 3d 448
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Howard D. Olinsky, attorney for Plaintiff Lakisha Janey Sinkler ("Plaintiff"), moves for attorney's fees in the amount of $16,851.00 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Dkt. 19). The Commissioner of Social Securit
District Court, W.D. New York · 2017-03-20 · Published · cited 5× · 243 F. Supp. 3d 384; 2017 WL 1063469
DECISION & ORDER JONATHAN W. FELDMAN, United States Magistrate Judge' Preliminary Statement Plaintiff Makesha Jimmeson (“plaintiff’ or “Jimmeson”) brings this action pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits. See Complaint (Docke
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-06-23 · Published · cited 1× · 263 F. Supp. 3d 135
MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH A. ROBINSON, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Steven Ellison (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action against’ the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking reversal of an Administrative Law Judge’s decision denying Plaintiffs claim for Supplemental Social Income Benefits.
District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019-06-05 · Published · cited 17× · 384 F. Supp. 3d 928
Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff applied for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") under Title XVI of the *931Social Security Act ("Act"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381a, 1382c, over five years ago. (Administrative Record (R.) 276-82). She claimed that she became disabled as of March 15, 2013 (R. 276), due to asthma, anxiety, bipolar d
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-01-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WINSTON MACCALLUM, JR., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 16-1429 v. DAR NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Performing Duties and Functions Not Reserved for the Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019-01-18 · Published · cited 19× · 355 F. Supp. 3d 972
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff seeks review of the denial of his applications for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits. Plaintiff contends the ALJ erred by rejecting his testimony and several medical opinions, and erred in determining his reasoning capability. Dkt. 20. As discussed below, the Court REVERSES the Commissioner's final decision and REM
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017-03-28 · Published · cited 23× · 247 F. Supp. 3d 908
MEMORANDUM BARBARA D. HOLMES, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), denying Plaintiffs claim for a period of disability, Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”), and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”), as provided under Titles II and XVI o
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-09-13 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHIRLONDA MONROE-EVANS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1081 DAR NANCY A. BERRYHILL,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-06-29 · Published · cited 103× · 861 F.3d 779; 2017 WL 2803188; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11584
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Charles Bryant appeals the decision of the district court 2 affirming the decision of the Commissioner to uphold the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of his application for disability insurance benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under the Social Security Act. Having jur
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018-09-26 · Published · cited 4× · 822 S.E.2d 30; 348 Ga. App. 221
Bethel, Judge. *32 *221 This appeal arises out of a medical malpractice action relating to Shane H. Berryhill's fall from a deer stand. Following a jury verdict in favor of Dr. Dale P. Daly, Berryh
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021-04-13 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-01450-COA ASHTON JOHNSON APPELLANT v. THOMAS KYLE SMITH APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/23/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. J. LARRY BUFFINGTON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WAYNE COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2017-09-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-2210 Filed September 27, 2017 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MONTAVIOUS KENTRELL SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, George L. Stigler, Judge. Montavious Smith appeals from his sentence following entry of a guilty plea
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 10, 2001 Session DANA ALLANMORE SMITH v. ANGELA CHILDRESS SMITH A Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Montgomery County No. 95-08-0007 The Honorable Carol Catalano, Chancellor No. M2000-02186-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 11, 2001 In this post-divorce proceeding, wife filed petition to
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976-11-30 · Published · cited 0× · 557 P.2d 910; 1976 OK 179; 1976 Okla. LEXIS 659
[1] Plaintiff filed action for damages resulting from alleged malpractice of defendants. Trial court sustained defendants' motion for judgment on pleadings. [2] Court of Appeals, Division 1, reversed and remanded with directions. Defendants petition for certiorari. [3] Plaintiff's petition indicates he received injuries to his mouth and teeth in automobile accident occurring on October 1, 1972. During October 1972, he employed defendant *Pag