Cases

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (O’Connor, J.), dated August 12, 2009, as granted his objection to that portion of an order of the same court (Blaustein, S.M.), dated June 5, 2009, as, after a hearing, directed him to pay child support in the sum of $340 per week commencing June 15, 2009, only to the extent of remi

Lester Jack Smith and Linda S. Smith, the sellers of certain real property in Bridgeport, appeal from a judgment entered by the Jackson Circuit Court on a jury verdict in favor of Ricky D. Evans, the purchaser of that property, on Evans's claim of fraud as to the location of the boundary lines of the property conveyed. *Page 775 Because we conclude that the Evans's fraud claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, we reverse and rema

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1882 ___________________________ Marcus D. Evans lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Lorenetta Smith, Sergeant, Varner Unit, ADC; Telicia Mothershed; Marquis Taylo

547 S.E.2d 278 (2001) 209 W.Va. 340 STATE of West Virginia ex rel. Eddie B. SMITH, Michael Smith and Donald P. Smith, Petitioners, v. Honorable Thomas C. EVANS, III, Judge of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, and Larry D. Smith, Respondents No. 29461. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted April 24, 2001. Decided May 11,

4 F.3d 1000 Smithv.Evans* NO. 92-9241 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept 17, 1993 1 Appeal From: M.D.Ga. 2

874 F.2d 820 Smithv.Evans* NO. 88-8359 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. APR 21, 1989 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. 2

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONReported at ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-1335, ___ N.E.3d ___. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING We grant Smith’s motion for rehearing and modify our judgment to additionally award Smith judgment against Evans for $500.00 attorney’s fees with interest at 9 percent per annum from January 4, 1980, until paid. Since the parties’ contract provided for reasonable attorney’s fees to the “prevailing party” enforcing the contract, and since the parties stipulated that $500.00 was a reasonable amount, and since Smi

308 S.C. 328 (1991) 417 S.E.2d 856 In the Matter of Ezra D. CLARK. Roxie C. Smith, Appellant v. Lucille EVANS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ezra D. Clark, Respondent. 23654 Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard November 21, 1991. Decided May 11, 1991. Stephen K. Haigler, Anderson, for appellant.

945 So.2d 184 (2006) Roy E. EVANS, et al. v. Derrick D. SMITH, et al. No. CA 2006-974. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. December 6, 2006. Ronald E. Corkern, Jr., Corkern & Crews, L.L.C., Natchitoches, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company, Derrick D. Smith. *185 Craig Owen M

*481In related child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the grandmother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Duffy, J.), entered August 18, 2004, which, after a hearing, denied her petition for custody and directed that the subject child remain in the care and custody of the Westchester County Department of Social Services. Order

Per Curiam. *430 {¶ 1} Appellant, William H. Evans Jr., appeals the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals dismissing his complaint for a writ of mandamus. We affirm. Allegations in the complaint <

42 Cal.App.3d 154 (1974) 116 Cal. Rptr. 684 SUSAN MASON SMITH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BARBARA EVANS, as City Clerk, etc., Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 14015. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. September 30, 1974. *155 COUNSEL M. Brooks Houghton and Ann R. Houghton

Opinion issued August 6, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00442-CV ——————————— RONALD EVANS, DDS, PLLC AND RONALD EVANS, Appellants V. ELEVEN ELEVEN HOLDINGS, LLC, RODRIC

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (William F. Kocher, A.J.), entered August 20, 2008 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant May Department Stores Company, incorrectly sued as Kaufmann’s Carousel, Inc. and May Department Stores International, Inc., for summary judgment on its contractual indemnification cross claim against defendants Wilmorite, Inc. and Eastview Mall Holdings, LLC.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ November 09, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A24A0436. ALYSSA EVANS v. CHUCK SMITH, IN HIS CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF MERIWETHER COUNTY This case was docketed by this court on October 11, 2023, and appellant’s brief and enumerations of error were due October 31, 2023. As of the date of this order, app

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 8, 2008 Session ERVIN D. SMITH, ET AL. v. PAUL EVANS, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Montgomery County No. MC-CH-CV-MG-07-1 Laurence M. McMillan, Jr., Judge No. M2007-02855-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 27, 2008 Owners of property brought suit to terminate an ingress/egress eas

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.