⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Snow Ingredients, Inc. v. SnoWizard, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015-07-13 · Published · cited 0× · 609 F. App'x 647
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. Each party shall bear its own costs.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-08-15 · Published · cited 142× · 833 F.3d 512; 95 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 994; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14977; 2016 WL 4363181
JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge: As the seasons turn from spring to summer in New Orleans, locals know to expect familiar changes. The days get longer. The temperature rises. And in the humid warmth of summer, long lines grow outside the most popular sno-ball shops. The parties in this case have come to expect another predictable event with the changing seasons — a visit fr
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 921 F. Supp. 2d 527; 2013 WL 393486; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12487
ORDER AND REASONS NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants SnoWizard, Inc. (“SnoWizard”) and Ronald R. Sciortino (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment on Duplicative Claims1 in Civil Action No. 11-1499, which was consolidated with Civil Actions Nos. 06-9170, 09-3394, and 10-0791 by another section of this Court befo
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012-12-14 · Published · cited 7× · 912 F. Supp. 2d 404; 2012 WL 6554025; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177330
ORDER AND REASONS1 NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. Before the Court is SnoWizard, Inc.’s and Ronald R. Sciortino’s (collectively, the “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Alleged RICO Claims Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Ref: 11-1499).2 _ Therein, Defendants request that this court dismiss with prejudice Counts 1 through 24 of the Complaint
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986-06-11 · Published · cited 51× · 791 F.2d 423; 230 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 118; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26038
RANDALL, Circuit Judge: Sno-Wizard Manufacturing, Inc., claiming that Eisemann Products Company and others violated provisions of Louisiana state law and § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), sought injunctive relief and damages from the district court. The district court found for Eisemann Products Company. Both parties appeal. We affirm. I.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-01-31 · Published · cited 6× · 92 F.4th 266
Case: 23-30335 Document: 00517051719 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/31/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED January 31, 2024
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024-01-04 · Published · cited 19× · 89 F.4th 1047
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-3331 ___________________________ UMB Bank, N.A. lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Richard Guerin, as personal representative for the estate of Jessie Benton,
Kim v. Kimmpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-02-27 · Published · cited 471× · 884 F.3d 98
Sack, Circuit Judge: *100The plaintiff Daniel Kim brings this action pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq. , alleging that the defendants engaged in a
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2018-09-17 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed September 17, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00760-CV MICHAEL WILLIAMS, Appellant V. CALIBER HOME LOANS, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District C
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-05-12 · Published · cited 12× · 67 F.4th 727
Case: 22-20093 Document: 00516749270 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 12, 2023
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-06-20 · Published · cited 23× · 37 F.4th 1078
Case: 21-50715 Document: 00516362859 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-04-06 · Published · cited 33× · 955 F.3d 453
Case: 18-50661 Document: 00515372650 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-50661
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2024-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
F. PATRICK QUINN, III NO. 2023-CA-0181 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL EDWIN M. PALMER AND DECATUR HOTELS, L.L.C. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: F. PATRICK QUINN, III NO. 2023-C-0254 VERSUS EDWIN M. PALMER, ET AL. APPEA
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-03-16 · Published · cited 33× · 62 F.4th 920
Case: 22-20364 Document: 00516679659 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019-03-30 · Published · cited 6× · 380 F. Supp. 3d 55
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff, the Republic of Kazakhstan ("Kazakhstan"), brought this civil suit *57against the defendants - Anatolie Stati, Gabriel Stati, and the two companies they own, Ascom Group, S.A. and Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd. (the "Stati Parties") - for alleged violations of the Racketeer Influenced and
California Court of Appeal · 2021-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/21/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO CHARLES W. BEST, JR., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, E074386 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1826349) OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al., OPINION
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-04-13 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-50018 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:18-cr-00022- CAS-1 BENJAMIN KOZIOL, AKA Benjamin Joseph Donovan, AKA Benjamin Joseph Koziol, O
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-01-30 · Published · cited 44× · 880 F.3d 760
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: After an eight-day jury trial, Defendants, Dr. Pramela Ganji and Elaine Davis, were convicted of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 , and health care fraud, in violation of
Kim v. Kimmpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
16‐2944 (L) Kim v. Kimm 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2017 4 (Submitted: October 23, 2017 Decided: February 27, 2018) 5 Docket Nos. 16‐2944, 16‐3115 6 7 8 DANIEL KIM, 9 Plaintiff‐Appellant‐Cross‐Appellee, 10
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-04-13 · Published · cited 20× · 993 F.3d 1160
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-50018 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:18-cr-00022- CAS-1 BENJAMIN KOZIOL, AKA Benjamin Joseph Donovan, AKA Benjamin Joseph Koziol, O