Cases

663 F.3d 1156 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald Wayne SNOW, Sr., a/k/a Gerald Snow, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-7096. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 19, 2011. *1157 Fred Randolph Lynn, Tulsa, OK, for Defendant-Appellant. Christopher J. Wilson, Assistant U.S. Attorney (S

LEE, C.J., for the Court: PROCEDURAL HISTORY - ¶ 1. Joseph Snow Schrotz was convicted of felony failure to stop a motor vehicle pursuant to the signal of a law-enforcement officer (felony failure to stop a-motor vehicle) and willful or malicious trespass (misdemeanor trespass). For the felony-failure-to-stop conviction, Schrotz was sen

Gants, C.J. The wife in this case did not pursue her claim for alimony during the divorce proceeding, but sought and obtained an alimony award more than four years after the divorce judgment. We conclude that, in such circumstances, the durational limit of general term alimony under G. L. c. 208, § 49 (b), starts to run on the date that the alimony was awarded, n

Dennis Turnipseed, administrator of the estate of Christopher Dennis Turnipseed, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Darryl Snow. This case is before this court pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 12-2-7(6). Our review of the record reveals the following pertinent facts, which are not in dispute: Stated another way, there are no disputed facts. On November 26, 1992, Turnipseed's 14-year-old son, Christopher Dennis Turnipseed, lost control of

Per Curiam. This is an application fora writ of supersedeas, staying the execution of the judgment pending the appeal, in an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage of personal property. The appellant (mortgagor) has executed the usual undertaking on appeal for three hundred dollars. The judgment in this case was rendered in accordance with section 726 Code of Civil Procedure. The Code prescribes no

Belcher, C. C. Action upon a promissory note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage. The original complaint was filed August 2, 1880, and the amended complaint August 10, 1882. In both complaints is set forth a copy of the note, and attached to them is a copy of the mortgage. The note is dated March 1, 1878, and is payable on demand with interest; the mortgage is dated June 1, 1878. In the mortgage the note is c

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion.

OSCN Found Document:SNOW v. TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

SNOW v. TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA2023 OK CIV APP 8527 P.3d 741Case Number: 119143Decided: 07/12/2022Mandate Issued: 03/24/2023DIVISION IVTHE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, DIVISION IV Cite as: 2023 OK CIV APP 8, 527 P.3d 741 GARY SNOW as Court Appointed Personal Representative

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge SHEDD joined. OPINION LUTTIG, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Benjamin Holmes, was convicted by a jury on two felony counts of being a felon in possession of a weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). The evidence at trial

After a jury found appellant guilty of murder, appellant pled true to the enhancement paragraph, and the jury assessed his punishment at 35 years confinement. Appellant asserts six points of error. In points of error one and two, appellant contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for severance. Tex. Code Crim.P.Ann. art. 36.09 (Vernon 1981) provides that: Two or more defendants who are jointly or separately indicted or complained against

964 N.E.2d 1139 (2012) 358 Ill. Dec. 117 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James C. SNOW, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-11-0415. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. January 11, 2012. Supplemental opinion filed on denial of rehearing March 5, 2012. *1144 Jon

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Snow, 2012 IL App (4th) 110415 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption JAMES C. SNOW, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. Fourth District Docket No. 4-11-0415 Filed January 11, 2012 Supplemental opinion fil

COZORT, Judge. Defendant appeals from the Industrial Commission’s award of total disability compensation benefits to plaintiff. The award was based on the conclusion that “intoxication was not a proximate cause of the accident [which disabled the plaintiff].” We affirm. Plaintiff Johnny Suggs, now approximately twenty-nine years old, worked at odd jobs as needed for defendant Snow Hill Milling Company (Sno

OPINION OF THE COURT Bernadette T. Clark, J. Before the court is a motion for summary judgment by Michael A. Fiore and the City of Utica (hereinafter referred to collectively as Utica defendants) dated June 12, 2014 and a cross motion for summary judgment by plaintiff John M. Holmes dated June 27, 2014 and a cross motion for summary judgment dated June 30, 2014 by Wyatt T. Holmes. Facts</

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KARL HOLMES, HERBERT McCLAIN and LORENZO NEWBORN, Defendants and Appellants. S058734 Los Angeles County Superior Court BA092268 January 31, 2022 Justice Corrigan authored the opinion of the Court,

402 F.Supp.2d 459 (2005) Judith KARPOVA, Plaintiff, v. John SNOW, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, and United States of America, Defendants. No. 05 CIV. 5812(CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 28, 2005. *460 *461 Michael Howard Sussman, Law Offices of Michael H. Su

SHELDON, J. The plaintiffs, Oliver Holmes and Hannah Sokol-Holmes, appeal from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Safeco Insurance Company of America, on the plaintiffs' claim for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in connection with the defendant's failure and refusal to pay their claim for coverage under their

39 P.3d 909 (2002) 179 Or. App. 222 STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Coy Randell SNOW, Respondent. 99CR0872; A110840 Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted July 31, 2001. Decided January 30, 2002. Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attor

693 F.Supp.2d 141 (2010) Arthuretta HOLMES-MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-2128. United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 17, 2010. *147 David H. Shapiro, Richard L. Swick, Ellen K. R