Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Solutia Inc. v. Shell Chemical Co.”
329 F.Supp.2d 853 (2004) SOUTHEAST TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL, L.L.C. and Regor Property, L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. BP AMOCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. G-03-969. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. May 17, 2004. *854 Frank W. Mitchell, Maloney Martin & Mitchell, Houston, TX, for Southeast
Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.public domain
225 F.Supp.2d 1069 (2002) ENGINEERED PRODUCTS CO., Plaintiff, v. DONALDSON COMPANY, INC., Defendant. No. C 98-2106-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern Division. September 30, 2002. *1070 *1071 Richard S. Fry, Shuttleworth & Ingersoll, Cedar Rapdis, IA, Edward M. Laine, pr
ACCEPTED 03-14-00667-CV 3957344 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Rogers Cartage Company v. Travelers Indemnity Co.public domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Caldwell v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.public domain
*514 OPINION AND ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. This is an action filed by plaintiff Larry R. Caldwell against PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., and PNC Bank (collectively “PNC”), the National City Corporation Amended and Restated Management Severance Plan (“the Plan”), Kerry Allen, a Plan administrator, and John Does 1-10. Plaint
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS [48] BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL; District Judge I. INTRODUCTION. Pending before the .Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 48.) After consideration of the papers "filed in support of and in opposition to, the instant, motion, the Court deems this mat
Depomed, Inc. v. Ivax Corp.public domain
532 F.Supp.2d 1170 (2007) DEPOMED, INC., Plaintiff, v. IVAX CORPORATION and Ivax Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants. No. C 06-00100 CRB. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 12, 2007. *1171 *1172 *1173 Christine Saunders. Haskett, Michael
United States v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.public domain
343 F.Supp.2d 809 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. MALLINCKRODT, INC.; Shell Oil, Company; and Solutia, Inc., Defendants. Mallinckrodt, Inc., and Solutia, Inc., Counterclaim and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. United States of America, Defense Logistics Agency, v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants. No. 4:02CV01488 ERW. United States District Court, E.D. M
Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc.public domain
268 F.Supp.2d 1148 (2003) CHIRON CORPORATION Plaintiff, v. GENENTECH, INC. Defendant. No. CIV.S-00-1252 WBS GG. United States District Court, E.D. California. June 24, 2002. *1150 Paul Joseph Riley, Morrison and Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, Eric S. Walters, Morrison and Foerster, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiff.
476 F.Supp.2d 1143 (2007) MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. O2 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, a Cayman Island corporation, Defendant. and Related Counterclaims. O2 Micro International Limited, a Cayman Island corporation, Plaintiff, v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, et al., Defendants. and Related Counterclaims and Cross-Claims. Nos. C 04-2000 CW,
Emergency Fuel, LLC v. Pennzoil-Quaker State Co.public domain
293 F.Supp.2d 569 (2003) EMERGENCY FUEL, LLC, et al. v. PENNZOIL-QUAKER STATE CO. No. CIV.A. CCB-00-156. United States District Court, D. Maryland. December 11, 2003. *570 *571 *572 James Elwood Armstrong, IV, Armstrong Westerman and Hattori LLP, Washington
Czerno v. General Electric Companypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1314 CRYSTAL CZERNO, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of C.L., a minor, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant, Appellant, MONSANTO COMPANY; SOLUTIA, INC.; PHARMACIA LLC; BAYER, AG; SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS GLOBAL TECHNO
Pacific Biosciences v. Oxford Nanopore Technologiespublic domain
Case: 20-2155 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2020-2155, 2020-2156 ___
Howad B. Silverberg v. Joanne S. Beckerpublic domain
Thompson, Associate Judge: This matter returns to this court after a remand to the trial court and an ensuing May 27, 2016, order (the "May 27 Order"). The May 27 Order granted the motions by appellees Joanne Becker, Brian Becker, Adam Becker, and Robin Tacchetti (hereinafter referred to individually by their first names and collectively as "the Beckers")
Bamford v. Penfold, L.P.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOSEPH C. BAMFORD and YOUNG MIN BAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. 2019-0005-JTL PENFOLD, L.P.; DELAWARE VALLEY ) REGIONAL CENTER, LLC; WEST 36TH, INC.; ) JOSEPH MANHEIM; and REATH & CO., LLC; ) )
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. The nation’s need for wartime supplies made during World War II and the Korean War left lasting environmental effects. More recent statutes require those involved to clean the pollution left in the refineries and plants where aviation fuel and other supplies our nation’s military needed were produced. This case requires the court to decide who pays,
ACCEPTED 03-15-00446-CV 7113707 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS