⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Source 4 Inc v. Noxell Corp”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024-12-23 · Published · cited 1× · 124 F.4th 529
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-3521 ___________________________ State of Kansas; State of North Dakota; State of Alabama; State of Idaho; State of Indiana; State of Iowa; State of Missouri; State of Montana; State of Nebraska; State of New Hampshire; State of Ohio; State of South Carolina; State of South Dakot
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020-04-06 · Published · cited 26× · 954 F.3d 1171
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2990 ___________________________ Safeway Transit LLC; Aleksey Silenko lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Discount Party Bus, Inc., an inactive Minnesota corporation; Party Bus MN L
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-06-25 · Published · cited 9× · 51 F. Supp. 3d 88; 2014 WL 2879753; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86274
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Maysaroh brings this action against defendants American Arab Communications & Translations Center, LLC t/a/ Zenobia Lounge, Farah Atassi, Charif Khanji, and Ahmad Atassi, 1 claiming that defendants violat
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017-11-09 · Published · cited 8× · 293 F. Supp. 3d 17
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The plaintiff, David T. Hardy, seeks attorneys' fees and costs as a "prevailing party" under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E), Pl.'s Mot. Att'ys' Fees ("Pl.'s Mot.") at 1, ECF No. 36, in this lawsuit challenging aspects of the response by d
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-11-09 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID T. HARDY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 15-1649 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, et al., Defe
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005-10-31 · Published · cited 19× · 397 F. Supp. 2d 245; 78 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1526; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25972; 2005 WL 2850861
397 F.Supp.2d 245 (2005) NATIONAL NONWOVENS, INC., Plaintiff v. CONSUMER PRODUCTS ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 04-30078MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 31, 2005. *246 Arthur F. Dionne, McCormick, Paulding & Huber LLP, Springfield, MA, for National Nonwovens, Inc., Plaintiff. Jame
District Court, D. Colorado · 2008-01-11 · Published · cited 2× · 556 F. Supp. 2d 1209; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2226; 2008 WL 140461
(2008) LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Isaac G. ENGIDA d/b/a I and G Liquors, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-cv-00225-LTB. United States District Court, D. Colorado. January 11, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge. This trademark infringement case is before me on Defendant's Res
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 930 F. Supp. 2d 145; 2013 WL 1096353; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36731
*147 MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge. The plaintiff in this case brings suit against a radio station whose call sign, he claims, infringes on his trademarks. There are difficult questions regarding the viability of that claim and this court’s subject matter jur
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013-11-01 · Published · cited 90× · 407 U.S. App. D.C. 133; 734 F.3d 1175; 108 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1540; 2013 WL 5853916; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 22255
Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS. ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. and Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Ltd. (together “Bell”) appeal the vacatur of a default judgment as void in connection with the manufacture and marketing by the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) of a helicopter that resembles Bell’s Jet Ranger 206 in a
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997-06-05 · Published · cited 0× · 966 F. Supp. 718; 44 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1057; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8328; 1997 WL 309946
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GETTLEMAN, District Judge. Defendants seek attorneys’ fees as the prevailing parties in this trademark/unfair competition litigation pursuant to Section 35(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) (“ § 35(a)”), and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, 815 ILCS 505/10a(e) (the “CFA”). The court should exercise its discretion to award such fees, def
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014-09-04 · Published · cited 478× · 61 V.I. 797; 764 F.3d 303; 2015 A.M.C. 585; 112 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1340; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17118; 2014 WL 4358471
OPINION OF THE COURT (September 4, 2014) FUENTES, Circuit Judge Fair Wind Sailing, Inc. brought this action against Virgin Island Sailing School (“VISS”) and its co-founder Scott Dempster, alleging, in relevant part, that Defendants infringed upon Fair Wind’s “trade dress” in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2014-10-09 · Published · cited 2× · 54 F. Supp. 3d 444; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146336; 2014 WL 5147551
ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on numerous motions filed by the parties following a jury trial in this case. In sum, Plaintiff has moved for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docs. Nos. 596, 597); Defendant Zillow1 has moved for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 (Doc. No. 582); all remaining Defendants2 have moved for at
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997-09-30 · Published · cited 69× · 127 F.3d 821; 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7729; 97 Daily Journal DAR 12439; 44 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1225; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26902; 1997 WL 597971
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: This case pits brother against brother in a battle for the family name. Tragically, we must resolve this family feud, though we suspect there is no real winner. Steve Boney, through his corporate alter-ego Stephen W. Boney, Inc. (“SWB”), sued his brothers Stan and Scott Boney, through their corporate alter-ego Boney Services, Inc. (“
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-10-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARK E. ROBINSON, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 15-444 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 63, 64, 70
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 205 F.3d 137; 2000 WL 232010
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge CHASANOW and Judge DAVIS joined. *139 OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: Ale House Management, Inc., an operator of a small chain of facilities selling food and beer in Florida, s
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000-03-01 · Published · cited 46× · 205 F.3d 137; 54 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1040; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2978
205 F.3d 137 (4th Cir. 2000) ALE HOUSE MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED, a Florida corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.RALEIGH ALE HOUSE, INCORPORATED, a North Carolina corporation; JOHN A. DURANKO, a resident of Florida, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-1175 (CA-98-247-5-F). UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Argued: January 24, 2000.Decided: March 1, 20
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-10-23 · Published · cited 0× · 341 F. Supp. 3d 97
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Mark Robinson, a sergeant in the District of Columbia's (the "District") Metropolitan Police Department ("MPD"), sued the District under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. ("Title VII"), and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-11-15 · Published · cited 35× · 999 F. Supp. 2d 61; 2013 WL 6047561; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162724
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge The Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”) brings this action against the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. Before the Court is [25] EPIC’s motion for attorney’s fees, and [28] DHS’s motion
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) RICA GATORE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-459 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES DEPARMENT ) OF HOMELAND SECU
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017-12-21 · Published · cited 12× · 286 F. Supp. 3d 25
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge Catholic Charities and eight individual plaintiffs brought this civil action against the defendant, the United States Department of Homeland Security, under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2012), seeking, inter alia, documents relating t