Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “South Carolina, State of v. Reeves”
Reeves v. South Carolina Municipal Insurancepublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Ashley Reeves, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Albert Carl "Bert" Reeves, Petitioner, v. South Carolina Municipal Insurance and Risk Financing Fund, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2019-001756 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Colleton County Pe
Davaut v. University of South Carolinapublic domain
JUSTICE KITTREDGE: Petitioner Nathalie I. Davaut appeals the denial of her claim for workers’ compensation benefits for injuries she sustained attempting to leave her workplace. We now reverse the court of appeals, which upheld the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s denial of those benefits. Davaut v. Univ. of S.C., Op. No. 2015-UP-041, 2015 WL 262093 (S.C. C
State of South Carolina v. Reevespublic domain
205 Ga. App. 656 (1992) 423 S.E.2d 32 STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA et al. v. REEVES (two cases) A92A1143, A92A1237. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided September 21, 1992. Reconsideration Denied October 1, 1992. Allgood & Daniel, Robert L. Allgood, for appellants. Stanley G. Jackson, for appellee.
Reeves v. Statepublic domain
SHORT, J. Bobby Joe Reeves was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC) with a minor and lewd act upon a child. He appeals from the denial and dismissal of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR), arguing the PCR court erred in finding his trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to investigate and present the testimony of a gynecological expert witness. We reverse. FACTS <
Progressive Direct Ins. Co. v. Reevespublic domain
JUSTICE KITTREDGE : **293 *423 We are presented with a certified question from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, asking this Court to construe section 38-77-350
Order JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge. Barry A. Harrison, Wesley T. Roach, and Dwayne M. Hawkins (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit alleging discrimination and retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., against their employer, South Carolina Department of Mental Health (“Defendant”). In accordance with 28 U.S.
State v. Reevespublic domain
301 S.C. 191 (1990) 391 S.E.2d 241 The STATE, Respondent v. Paul Harlan REEVES, Appellant. 23185 Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard October 4, 1989. Decided March 19, 1990. *192 Robert T. Williams, of Williams & Brink, Lexington, for appellant. Atty.
Martin v. ALUMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.public domain
380 F.Supp.2d 723 (2005) Terry MARTIN and Dick Villanueva, Plaintiffs, v. ALUMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., Defendant. No. CUV,A,2:03-3878-SB. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. June 24, 2005. *724 *725 A. Christopher Potts, Hitchcock and Potts, Charleston, SC,
289 S.C. 445 (1986) 346 S.E.2d 716 STATE of South Carolina, ex rel. T. Travis MEDLOCK, Attorney General, Appellant v. The SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL and C.E. Graham Reeves, Respondents, and The LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF SOUTH CAROLINA and the League of Women Voters of Charleston County, Appellants v. The SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL and C.E. Graham Reeves, Respondents. 22602
Bell v. TOWN OF PORT ROYAL, SOUTH CAROLINApublic domain
586 F.Supp.2d 498 (2008) James M. BELL, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF PORT ROYAL, SOUTH CAROLINA, a body politic, Defendant. C.A. No. 9:06-cv-1095-PMD United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Beaufort Division. April 21, 2008. *500 John M. Leiter, John M. Leiter Law Offices, Myrtle Beach, SC, for Plaintiff. Mary Bass Lohr,
Zachary Hebb v. City of Asheville, North Carolinapublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1383 Doc: 39 Filed: 07/23/2025 Pg: 1 of 57 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1383 ZACHARY HEBB, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA; BEN WOODY, individually and in his official cap
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge SHEDD joined. *135 KING, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Jennifer Gilliam appeals from the district court’s award of summary judgment to defendant South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice (
Indigo Williams v. Tate Reevespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 7, 2020 No. 19-60069 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk INDIGO WILLIAMS, on behalf of her minor child J.E.; DO
Clark v. Thi of South Carolina at Moncks Corner, LLCpublic domain
(2007) Cheryl CLARK, Plaintiff, v. THI OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT MONCKS CORNER, LLC, d/b/a Magnolia Manor-Moncks Corner, Trans Health Management, Inc., and Magnolia Manor-Moncks Corner, Inc., Defendants. C.A. No. 2:05-3445-PMD. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. November 2, 2007. ORDER PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, Dist
Reeves v. City of West Liberty, Kentuckypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Henry R. Wilholt, Jr., United States District Judge This matter is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 28]. The motion has been fully briefed by the parties [Docket Nos. 28-1, 29 and 30], For the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that summary judgment is not appropriate as to any of Plaintiffs claims except for his claim for defama
South Carolina Tax Commission v. Reevespublic domain
278 S.C. 658 (1983) 300 S.E.2d 916 SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION, Respondent, v. Charles W. REEVES, William Simons and Simons Appliance Center, Appellants. 21878 Supreme Court of South Carolina. March 14, 1983. Irvin J. Slotchiver, of Rosen, Oberman & Rosen, Charleston, for appellants. Atty. Gen. T. Travis M
Reeves v. Roepublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied. Same case below, 392 S.C. 143, 708 S.E.2d 778.
*747Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents the question whether state sovereign immunity precludes petitioner Federal Maritime Commission (FMC or Commission) from adjudicating a private party’s complaint that a state-run port has violated the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U. S. C. App. § 1701 et seq. (1994 ed. and Supp.
Roe v. Reevespublic domain
*145Justice HEARN. In this case, Craig Reeves (Father) claims his consent was necessary prior to another couple adopting his child. The family court agreed, finding that he met the requirements of Section 63-9-310(A)(5)(b) of the South Carolina Code (2010) and awarding him custody of the child. We find that Father did not undertake sufficient good faith efforts to assum
City of El Cenizo, Texas v. State of Texaspublic domain
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: We withdraw our prior opinion of March 13, 2018, City of El Cenizo v. Texas , 885 F.3d 332 (5th Cir. 2018), and substitute the following, the purpose of which is to eliminate reference to United States v