⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “South Carolina, State of v. Reeves”

Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2021-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Ashley Reeves, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Albert Carl "Bert" Reeves, Petitioner, v. South Carolina Municipal Insurance and Risk Financing Fund, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2019-001756 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Colleton County Pe
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016-10-26 · Published · cited 3× · 418 S.C. 627; 795 S.E.2d 678; 2016 S.C. LEXIS 301
JUSTICE KITTREDGE: Petitioner Nathalie I. Davaut appeals the denial of her claim for workers’ compensation benefits for injuries she sustained attempting to leave her workplace. We now reverse the court of appeals, which upheld the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s denial of those benefits. Davaut v. Univ. of S.C., Op. No. 2015-UP-041, 2015 WL 262093 (S.C. C
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992-09-21 · Published · cited 1× · 423 S.E.2d 32; 205 Ga. App. 656; 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 1280
205 Ga. App. 656 (1992) 423 S.E.2d 32 STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA et al. v. REEVES (two cases) A92A1143, A92A1237. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided September 21, 1992. Reconsideration Denied October 1, 1992. Allgood & Daniel, Robert L. Allgood, for appellants. Stanley G. Jackson, for appellee.
Reeves v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015-11-12 · Published · cited 0× · 415 S.C. 366; 782 S.E.2d 747; 2015 S.C. App. LEXIS 236
SHORT, J. Bobby Joe Reeves was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC) with a minor and lewd act upon a child. He appeals from the denial and dismissal of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR), arguing the PCR court erred in finding his trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to investigate and present the testimony of a gynecological expert witness. We reverse. FACTS <
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2019-07-24 · Published · cited 1× · 831 S.E.2d 422; 427 S.C. 291
JUSTICE KITTREDGE : **293 *423 We are presented with a certified question from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, asking this Court to construe section 38-77-350
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2014-09-18 · Published · cited 0× · 47 F. Supp. 3d 388; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130878; 2014 WL 4700642
Order JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge. Barry A. Harrison, Wesley T. Roach, and Dwayne M. Hawkins (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit alleging discrimination and retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., against their employer, South Carolina Department of Mental Health (“Defendant”). In accordance with 28 U.S.
State v. Reevespublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990-03-19 · Published · cited 75× · 391 S.E.2d 241; 301 S.C. 191; 1990 S.C. LEXIS 77
301 S.C. 191 (1990) 391 S.E.2d 241 The STATE, Respondent v. Paul Harlan REEVES, Appellant. 23185 Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard October 4, 1989. Decided March 19, 1990. *192 Robert T. Williams, of Williams & Brink, Lexington, for appellant. Atty.
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2005-06-24 · Published · cited 0× · 380 F. Supp. 2d 723; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20869; 2005 WL 1864181
380 F.Supp.2d 723 (2005) Terry MARTIN and Dick Villanueva, Plaintiffs, v. ALUMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., Defendant. No. CUV,A,2:03-3878-SB. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. June 24, 2005. *724 *725 A. Christopher Potts, Hitchcock and Potts, Charleston, SC,
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986-07-28 · Published · cited 9× · 346 S.E.2d 716; 289 S.C. 445; 16 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21004; 1986 S.C. LEXIS 404
289 S.C. 445 (1986) 346 S.E.2d 716 STATE of South Carolina, ex rel. T. Travis MEDLOCK, Attorney General, Appellant v. The SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL and C.E. Graham Reeves, Respondents, and The LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF SOUTH CAROLINA and the League of Women Voters of Charleston County, Appellants v. The SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL and C.E. Graham Reeves, Respondents. 22602
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2008-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 586 F. Supp. 2d 498; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32773; 2008 WL 1849865
586 F.Supp.2d 498 (2008) James M. BELL, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF PORT ROYAL, SOUTH CAROLINA, a body politic, Defendant. C.A. No. 9:06-cv-1095-PMD United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Beaufort Division. April 21, 2008. *500 John M. Leiter, John M. Leiter Law Offices, Myrtle Beach, SC, for Plaintiff. Mary Bass Lohr,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1383 Doc: 39 Filed: 07/23/2025 Pg: 1 of 57 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1383 ZACHARY HEBB, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA; BEN WOODY, individually and in his official cap
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007-01-16 · Published · cited 130× · 474 F.3d 134; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 874; 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,710; 99 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 865; 2007 WL 92900
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge SHEDD joined. *135 KING, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Jennifer Gilliam appeals from the district court’s award of summary judgment to defendant South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice (
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-12-07 · Published · cited 3× · 981 F.3d 437
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 7, 2020 No. 19-60069 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk INDIGO WILLIAMS, on behalf of her minor child J.E.; DO
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2007-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 586 F. Supp. 2d 387; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97946; 2007 WL 5734506
(2007) Cheryl CLARK, Plaintiff, v. THI OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT MONCKS CORNER, LLC, d/b/a Magnolia Manor-Moncks Corner, Trans Health Management, Inc., and Magnolia Manor-Moncks Corner, Inc., Defendants. C.A. No. 2:05-3445-PMD. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. November 2, 2007. ORDER PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, Dist
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2016-11-29 · Published · cited 0× · 219 F. Supp. 3d 600; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163953; 2016 WL 7007498
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Henry R. Wilholt, Jr., United States District Judge This matter is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 28]. The motion has been fully briefed by the parties [Docket Nos. 28-1, 29 and 30], For the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that summary judgment is not appropriate as to any of Plaintiffs claims except for his claim for defama
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983-03-14 · Published · cited 2× · 300 S.E.2d 916; 278 S.C. 658; 1983 S.C. LEXIS 250
278 S.C. 658 (1983) 300 S.E.2d 916 SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION, Respondent, v. Charles W. REEVES, William Simons and Simons Appliance Center, Appellants. 21878 Supreme Court of South Carolina. March 14, 1983. Irvin J. Slotchiver, of Rosen, Oberman & Rosen, Charleston, for appellants. Atty. Gen. T. Travis M
Reeves v. Roepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-11-28 · Published · cited 0× · 181 L. Ed. 2d 483; 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8557; 132 S. Ct. 760; 565 U.S. 1059; 80 U.S.L.W. 3317
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied. Same case below, 392 S.C. 143, 708 S.E.2d 778.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-05-28 · Published · cited 446× · 152 L. Ed. 2d 962; 122 S. Ct. 1864; 535 U.S. 743; 2002 U.S. LEXIS 3794; 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20702; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 303; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 5783; 2002 A.M.C. 1372; 70 U.S.L.W. 4464; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4530; 62 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1321
*747Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents the question whether state sovereign immunity precludes petitioner Federal Maritime Commission (FMC or Commission) from adjudicating a private party’s complaint that a state-run port has violated the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U. S. C. App. § 1701 et seq. (1994 ed. and Supp.
Roe v. Reevespublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 708 S.E.2d 778; 392 S.C. 143; 2011 S.C. LEXIS 160
*145Justice HEARN. In this case, Craig Reeves (Father) claims his consent was necessary prior to another couple adopting his child. The family court agreed, finding that he met the requirements of Section 63-9-310(A)(5)(b) of the South Carolina Code (2010) and awarding him custody of the child. We find that Father did not undertake sufficient good faith efforts to assum
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-05-08 · Published · cited 95× · 890 F.3d 164
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: We withdraw our prior opinion of March 13, 2018, City of El Cenizo v. Texas , 885 F.3d 332 (5th Cir. 2018), and substitute the following, the purpose of which is to eliminate reference to United States v