Cases

61 S.W.3d 465 (2001) CRESCENDO INVESTMENTS, INC.; Charles E. Engelman, Individually and as Trustee for the Engelman Family Trust; Encotec International Inc.; Thomas R. Russell; Roger Bean; Christopher B. Ticknor, M.D.; Buford Clemmer; K. Dale Kartchner, M.D., Profit Sharing Plan & Trust; Michael H. Schlatter; Thomas Weiss, M.D.; Robert C. Adair; Bonna L. Loy, as Trustee for the James R. Loy and Bonna L. Loy Revocable Living Trust; Richard W. Miller;

186 F.3d 311 (3rd Cir. 1999) LUCENT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellantv.LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. No. 98-7203 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Argued May 25, 1999Filed: August 3, 1999 On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (D.C. Civ. No. 96-00450)

531 F.Supp.2d 365 (2007) The REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA INC., et al., Defendants. No. 04-CV-4372 (NGG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 19, 2007. *366 *367 *368 *369

No. 04-00-00101-CV CRESCENDO INVESTMENTS, INC.; Charles E. Engelman, Individually And As Trustee For The Engelman Family Trust; Encotec International Inc.; Thomas R. Russell; Roger Bean; Christopher B. Ticknor, M.D.; Buford Clemmer; K. Dale Kartchner, M.D., Profit Sharing Plan & Trust; Michael H. Schlatter; Thomas Weiss, M.D.; Rober

JEFFREY T. MILLER, United States District Judge On June 12, 2018, Defendants The International Boundary & Water Commission-United *920States Section ("USIBWC") and Veolia Water North America-West, LLC ("Veolia") (collectively, "Defendants") filed separate motions to dismiss. (Doc. Nos. 15, 17.) Plaintiffs the City of Imperial Beach, San Die

JEFFREY T. MILLER, United States District Judge On September 26, 2018, Defendants the International Boundary & Water Commission - United States Section ("USIBWC") and Veolia Water North America - West, LLC ("Veolia") (collectively, "Defendants") filed separate motions to dismiss. (Doc. Nos. 32, 33.) Plaintiffs the City of Imperial Beach, San Diego Unified Port District, and the City of Chula Vista (collectively, "Plaintiffs") op

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D. I This case involves claims under both the New Jersey Antitrust Act, for a conspiracy in restraint of trade, and the common law, for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, based on alleged predatory pricing. Plaintiff Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. (Ideal), prevailed at trial and recovered seven-figure damages under

TONE, Circuit Judge. The issue in this case is whether a Chicago milk inspection ordinance imposes an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce, thereby violating the Commerce Clause, article I, section 8, of the Constitution. The District Court, after trial, entered a judgment holding the ordinance unconstitutional. We affirm that judgment. Plaintif

DON E. BURRELL, J., Opinion Author. Valerie Kay Yonker (now Boyce) (“Ex-Wife”) appeals the judgment of contempt and subsequent order of commitment entered after she failed to pay her ex-husband, Scott Damian Yonker (“Ex-Husband”), $250,000.00 as required by the parties’ dissolution judgment. Ex-Wife’s first point claims the trial court’s contempt finding “was an abuse of discretion, against the weight of

653 F.Supp. 1250 (1987) TASTY BAKING COMPANY and Tastykake, Inc. v. RALSTON PURINA, INC. and Continental Baking Co. Civ. A. No. 86-4961. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 21, 1987. *1251 *1252 *1253 *1254

In Re the Marriage of: ) SCOTT D. YONKER, and ) VALERIE K. YONKER, ) ) SCOTT DAMIAN YONKER, ) ) Petitioner-Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD32564 ) VALERIE KAY

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION STEEH, District Judge. Plaintiff David Yadlosky moves for class certification pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(3). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion will be DENIED. *295 BACKGROUND Plainti

Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court: In 1977, the Minnesota Legislature enacted a statute banning the retail sale of milk in plastic nonreturnable, nonrefillable containers, but permitting such sale in other nonreturnable, nonrefillable containers, such as paperboard milk cartons. 1977 Minn. Laws, ch. 268, Minn. Stat. § 116F.21 (1978). Respondents1 contend that the st

DECISION AND ORDER HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. On May 10, 1994, a hearing was held on class plaintiffs’ application for approval of the settlement of the two provisionally-certified class actions, which have been consolidated under the above caption and civil number. Also pending are the joint petition of class counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees, reimbursement of litigation costs and expen

OPINION CONTI, Chief United States District Judge These putative class actions were filed against Owens Corning and Owens Corning Sales, LLC (collectively, “Owens Coming” or “defendants”) and arise out of Owens Coming’s manufacture and sale of allegedly defective Oakridge-brand fiberglass asphalt roofing shingles. One case was filed against Owens Corning in this court, and three separate cases were filed in

992 F.Supp. 162 (1996) BUILDING INDUSTRY FUND et al., Plaintiffs, v. LOCAL UNION NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL — CIO et al., Defendants. No. 93 CV 2721. United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 8, 1996. Opinion on Reconsideration May 8, 1996. *163

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS