Cases

JUSTICE HART, dissenting. ¶70 In Neil v. Biggers , the Supreme Court explained that when a procedure used to elicit eyewitness identification of a criminal defendant is "so unnecessarily suggestive and condu[cive] to irreparable mistaken identification that [the defendant] was denied due process of law" that procedure must be screened to ensure the reliability of the identification.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHELSEY DUDLEY, No. 24-3233 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 1:22-cv-00495- v. DCN BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY; TONY ROARK, in his official and OPINION individual capacity; MANDY NELSON, in her official and individual capacity; KAT

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4521 Doc: 150 Filed: 09/17/2024 Pg: 1 of 51 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4508 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. AGHEE WILLIAM SMITH, II, Defendant – Appe

USCA11 Case: 22-14205 Document: 37-1 Date Filed: 01/05/2024 Page: 1 of 37 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-14205 ____________________ JERRY NELSON, as Personal Repre

USCA11 Case: 22-14205 Document: 37-1 Date Filed: 01/05/2024 Page: 1 of 37 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-14205 ____________________ JERRY NELSON, as Personal Repre

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4508 Doc: 153 Filed: 09/17/2024 Pg: 1 of 51 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4508 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. AGHEE WILLIAM SMITH, II, Defendant – Appe

USCA11 Case: 22-14205 Document: 37-1 Date Filed: 01/05/2024 Page: 1 of 37 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-14205 ____________________ JERRY NELSON, as Personal Repre

60 S.W.3d 106 (2001) Ricky HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. 861-00. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. November 14, 2001. Floyd D. Holder, Jr., Lynette Hammond, Lubbock, for Appellant. William C. Sowder, DA, Lubbock, for State. PRICE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which MEYERS, WOMACK, JOHNSON, and HOLCOMB, J.J., join. COC

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION August 12, 2021 Plaintiff-Appellee,

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION August 12, 2021 Plaintiff-Appellee,

643 F.3d 425 (2011) Randall GONZALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee. No. 10-20019. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 13, 2011. George McCall Secrest, Jr. (argued), Bennett & Secrest, P.L.L.C., Houston, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

618 F.Supp.2d 62 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Joseph FERNANDES, Defendant. Criminal No. 06-197 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 26, 2009. *64 Jessie Liu, John Crabb, Jr., U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for United States of America. Lara Gabrielle Quint, Jonathan Jeffress, Federa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal No. 06-197 (JDB) JOSEPH FERNANDES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Now before the Court are six motions filed by defendant Joseph Fernandes, including a motion to dismiss for violation of defendant's Sixth Amendment right to

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0236p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: FLINT WATER CASES. │ _________________________________________

621 F.Supp.2d 1207 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Andreas Jejuan SMITH. Criminal Action No. 07cr165. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. May 26, 2009. *1208 Kevin L. Butler, Christine Ann Freeman, Aylia McKee, Federal Defenders, Middle District of Alabama, Richard Kelly Keith, Keith & Dubin, P.C

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judges Motz and Keenan wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge Gregory, and Judges King, Wynn, Floyd, Thacker, and Harris joined. Judge Keenan wrote a concurring opinion, in which Judges Motz and Thacker joined. Judge Wilkinson wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Judges Niemeyer, Agee, Richardson, Quattlebaum, and Senior Judge Duncan joined. Judge Wilkinson wrote a specially diss

OPINION and ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. On April 21, 2011, Bill Watson, the elected Sheriff in Portsmouth, Virginia (“Sheriff Watson”), ordered his deputies to conduct strip searches of all civilian contractors that entered the Portsmouth City Jail (the “Jail”) the following day. Sheriff Watson issued such blanket order based on information he had received indicating that contractors w

DeWine, J. *405 {¶ 1} This is a direct appeal in a capital case. Austin Myers was convicted of aggravated murder with a death specification for killing his childhood friend Justin Back. We affirm his convictions and the imposition of the death penalty.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–0002 Filed April 24, 2020 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. EARL BOOTH-HARRIS, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Des Moines County, John G. Linn, Judge. A defendant seeks further review of a court of appeals decision rejecting his due process challenge to a police photo array ide