Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge. Plaintiff Nicholas Spaeth sued six law schools and various officers at those schools alleging that they violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”), by not offering him a tenure-track teaching position after he applied to them in

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge. Plaintiff Nicholas Spaeth brings suit against Georgetown University, alleging that it discriminated based on age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (“ADEA”), and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, D.C.Code §§ 2-14

Re Document No.: 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The Plaintiff, Marcela S. Santos has brought a complaint against the Defen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-760 (CKK) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (May 10, 2019) Currently pending before the C

SPAETH, President Judge, dissenting: This appeal is from two orders. I believe that both orders should be reversed. In its first order the trial court sustained the College’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, holding that insofar as the Gluhman evaluations were concerned, appellant had stated no claim against the College for defamation because the evaluations were absolutely

172 Ariz. 356 (1991) 837 P.2d 158 ARIZONA CENTER FOR LAW IN the PUBLIC INTEREST, a nonprofit corporation; Defenders of Wildlife, a nonprofit corporation; Michael Gregory; Thomas Wright, and James Vaaler, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Milo J. HASSELL, in his capacity as State Land Commissioner; Arizona State Land Department, an agency of the State of Arizona, and State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees, Calmat Co. of Arizona, an

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRANCISCO E. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1506 (TJK) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-819 (RDM) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on the individual defendants’ motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, to

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) Daniel A. Umbert et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-cv-1336 (TSC) ) United States et

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MOHAMAD HAZEM ALABRASH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Case No. 22-1875 (CKK) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 15, 2022)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TIMOTHY ROTE, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 19-01299 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 13 : COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Re Doc. No.: 102 MEMORANDUM OPINION Transferring Plaintiff’s Preliminary Injunction and Privacy Act Claim to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This action is before the Court on Plaintiff Jeremy Pinson’s (“Plaintiff’) August 15, 2014, Motion for Pre

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN OVERSIGHT, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 18-656 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, et al., Defendants.

Re Document Nos.: 2, 5-13, 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION Resolving All Pending Motions RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This action arises out of the Defendants’ alleged violations of the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act. On November 15, 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CONSOL ENERGY INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-01475 (CJN) Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-01476 (CJN) HELVETIA COAL CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIO

536 U.S. 765 (2002) REPUBLICAN PARTY OF MINNESOTA et al. v. WHITE, CHAIRPERSON, MINNESOTA BOARD OF JUDICIAL STANDARDS, et al. No. 01-521. United States Supreme Court. Argued March 26, 2002. Decided June 27, 2002. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT *766 Scalia, J., delivered th

470 N.W.2d 203 (1991) STATE of North Dakota, By and Through its Tax Commissioner, Heidi HEITKAMP, Plaintiff, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. QUILL CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellee and Cross-Appellant. Civ. No. 900257. Supreme Court of North Dakota. May 7, 1991. *204 Nicholas J. Spaeth, Atty. Gen., Bismarck, for plaintiff, appell

CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 Reggie B. Walton, United States District Judge The government initiated this action against Quicken Loans Inc. (“Quicken”) pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 (2012), Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶ 1, alleging that, between September 1, 2007, and December 31

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiffs, Barbara Smith and Clarence A. D. Gasby, initiated this action against the defendants, Martin J. A. Yeager, Land, Carroll & Blair, P.C. (“Land Carroll”), where Yeager was a principal and agent, Gregory T. Dumont, and Mid-Atlantic Commercial Law Group, LLC (“Mid-Atlantic”),

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Maurice Alexander alleges he was wrongfully denied residence at three apartment buildings, each of whose selection policies violate 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq., the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), and are a breach of contract with the District of Columbia Housing