Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “Spavone v. Fischer”
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: This case concerns how the New York State Department of Correctional Ser *129 vices 1 (“DOCS”) determines when an inmate receives temporary medical leave from prison for the treatment of mental illness.
Samuels v. Fischerpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Plaintiff Kenneth Samuels (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against defendants Brian Fischer (“Fischer”), Albert Prack (“Prack”), Philip Heath (“Heath”), William Keyser (“Keyser”), Michael Barnes (“Barnes”), Corey Gamble (“Gamble”), Ronald Brereton (“Brereton”), Kenneth White (‘White”), Brian Schrader (“Schrad
Allen v. Fordpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. Plaintiff, Larry Allen (“Allen”), who was an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Corrections (“DOCS”) at the Wende Correctional Facility (“Wende”), originally brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pro se, but has since been appointed counsel. Allen claims that on or about January 26, 2006, while work
Davis v. McCreadypublic domain
GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge: Plaintiff Carl Davis was shot eight times in his chest, arms, back, and left leg. Two months later, he was incarcerated at Riker's Island for five days. While at Riker's Island, Mr. Davis received emergency medical care from Defendant Joseph McCready, RPA.1 In the course of Mr. Davis's emergency visit, he informed Defendant that he suffered from excruciating pain through
Randle v. Alexanderpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge Plaintiff El’Reko D’Wayne Randle filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Randle alleges that prison officials violated the Eighth Amendment by forcing him to fight and ultimately kill another prisoner while they watched. He also alleges Eighth Amendment violations related to a two-year period of solitary confinement. In three separate motions, Defendants
Boston v. Suffolk Cnty.public domain
SPATT, District Judge: The Plaintiff Robert Boston (the "Plaintiff") brought this civil rights action against the Defendants Suffolk County, New York (the "County" or "Suffolk"), Suffolk County Police Department (the "SCPD") (with the County, the "Suffolk Defendants"), Town Of Smithtown, New York (the "Town" or "Smithtown"), Town Of Smithtown Park Police ("TSPP") (with Smithtown, the "Smithtown Defendants"), Suffolk County Police O
Young v. Choinskipublic domain
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Cedric Young, a prisoner incarcerated at the Northern Correctional Institution (“NCI”) in Somers, Connecticut, commenced this civil rights action pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that the defendants, prison officials and personnel (collec
Kucharczyk v. Westchester Countypublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Pro se Plaintiff Louis Kucharczyk (“Plaintiff’) filed the instant Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Westchester County, Correct Care Solutions LLC, Correct Care Solutions New York, Dr. Ulloa (“Dr. Ulloa”), N.P. Linda Beyer (“Beyer”), Medical Liaison June Yozzo (“Yozzo”), Nurse Michael Kelly (“Kelly”), and N.P. Tufaro (“Tufaro”) (coll
Lloyd v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT McMAHON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Devon Lloyd, Brandi Simmons, and Chayrmar Brown (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq., the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), against the City of New York throug
Jones v. Westchester Countypublic domain
OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Pro se Plaintiff Andre Jones (“Plaintiff’) brings this Action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Westchester County (the “County”), Sergeant Oddes Andrews (“Andrews”), Officer Bruce Allen (“Allen”), and Officer Karl Best (“Best”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants engaged in conduct that violated Plaintiffs rights under the Eighth Ame
Hunter v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff James Hunter, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on or about December 12, 2012 against Defendants City of New York, Officer Giuca, Shield # 9511 and Detective King, Shield # 4607, alleging deprivation of due process, breach of oath of office, deprivation of equal protection of the law and abuse of authority by indi
Parks v. Blanchettepublic domain
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO AMEND EXHIBITS VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Defendants’ Motion to Correct the Exhibits.. . .292 II. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. . .294 A. Background Facts... .294 B. Standard...296
Dilworth v. Goldbergpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Anthony Dilworth (“Dilworth”) and Patricia Dilworth (“Patricia”) (together, “the Dilworths” or “plaintiffs”) have brought this action arising out of Dilworth’s confinement in the Westchester County Jail (the “WCJ”). They allege various federal and state claims against New York Medical College (“NYMC”), Westchester County,
Hardy v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
732 F.Supp.2d 112 (2010) Lawrence HARDY, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, the City of New York Department of Correction, Correction Officer Patrick Dorvil, Badge No. 11544, Frantz Medard, M.D. as Agents, Servants, and Employees of the City of New York Department of Correction, Officer Ricky Reynolds, Officer Brian Lewis, Officer George Lewis, Officer Thomas Lewis, Nurse Ann Dalecki, P.A. Noriel DeGuzman, Kamal Pathak, M.D., as Agents, Servants
Ying Li v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge: On March 26, 2015, Plaintiff Ying Li commenced this action against Defendants pursuant .to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) and New York law. (See Dkt. 1.) Plaintiffs ten-count Amended Complaint alleges numerous theories of liability against Defendants. (See Dkt. 36, Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.”).) In general, Plaintiff alle