Cases

284 F.Supp.2d 477 (2002) Anne SPEARS, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART,[1] Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. CIV.A. H-00-4024. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 28, 2002. *478 Victor N. Makris, Attorney at Law, Bellaire, TX, for plaintiff. Joseph

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0012p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RAMON HUESO, ┐ Petitioner-Appellant, │ │

406 F.Supp.2d 1038 (2005) Kathryn M. MASCH, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. Case No. 05-C-625. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. December 20, 2005. *1039 *1040 *1041 David F. Trav

428 F.Supp.2d 869 (2006) Stanley PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 05-C-1120. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. April 12, 2006. *870 Lynn M. Zuehlsdorf-Mack, Mack Law Offices, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff. Brian E. Pawlak, United Sta

338 F.Supp.2d 941 (2004) Carol A. SCHWABE, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 02-C-0487. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. September 25, 2004. *942 *943 *944 David Traver, for Plain

321 F.Supp.2d 1015 (2004) William LECHNER, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 03-C-1425. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. June 14, 2004. *1016 *1017 David Traver, for Plaintiff. Nora Barry, for Defendant. <

ORDER Barbara Schleif challenges the Social Security Administration’s determination that her clinical depression is not disabling for purposes of receiving disability insurance benefits. Although Schleif correctly points out factual and legal errors in Administrative Law Judge John Pleuss’ order denying her application for benefits, substantial evidence supports his conclusion that she is not disabled. Accordingly, we affirm.

233 F.Supp.2d 5 (2002) Sonali IYENGAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, et al. Defendants. No. CIV.A.02-0825 ESH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 26, 2002. *6 *7 Rajiv Santosh Khanna, Gaillard Hunt, Arlington, VA, for Plaintiffs. Sharad S. Khandel

180 F.Supp.2d 990 (2001) Joseph P. NOVAK, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration,[1] Defendant. No. 00-C-0064. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. December 28, 2001. *991 *992 *993 David F. Trave

207 F.Supp.2d 886 (2002) Janice GOTZ, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 01-C-0094. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. June 25, 2002. *887 David F. Traver, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff. Penelope C. Fleming, Milwaukee, WI, for Defendant.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-1545 JAMES YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. James Young applied for Social Security disability benefits, claiming that he suffered from progressively declining cognitive abilities and increasing personality problems which interfered completely with his ability to work. The Social Security Administration (“SSA”) denied Young’s application and upon review, the administrative law judge

OPINION McMANUS, Justice. This action was brought in the Bernalillo County District Court and involved a complaint asking for declaratory judgment and for an injunction enjoining the City of Albuquerque from proceeding to place fluoride in the water supply. The court granted summary judgment for the defendants, denying any relief • to the plaintiffs who perfected this ap

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AHWAR SULTAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-cv-1121 DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., in his official capacity as President of the United States, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Ahwar Sultan moves for a Tempor

Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. Federal law regulates the fees that attorneys may charge Social Security claimants for representation before the Social Security Administration and a reviewing court. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 406 (a) - (b). T

Dennis Jacobs, Circuit Judge: Roberta Borenstein appeals from a judgment of the United States Tax Court (Lauber, J. ) denying her petition seeking refund of her overpayment of 2012 income tax. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("the Commissioner") and Borenstein do not dispute that she overpaid, or the amount of her overpayment; however, the Commissioner argues--and the Tax Court agreed--that the Tax Court lacks jurisdi

888 N.E.2d 828 (2008) Thomas N. SCHIRO, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 10A01-0701-CR-21. Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 19, 2008. *831 Matthew Jon McGovern, Evansville, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Scott J. Barnhart, Deputy Attorney Genera

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT KMG PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellant, v. OWL CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Appellee. No. 2D2023-1769 April 24, 2024 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Pat

ORDER (Pis.’ Motion to Amend/Correct — dkt. no. 97; Pis.’ Motion for Vacatur — dkt. no. 99; Pis.’ Motion for Permanent Injunction — dkt. no. 100; Pis. Motion for Clarification — dkt. nó. 101; Defs.’ Motion for Reconsideration — dkt. no. 105) MIRANDA M. DU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ' I. SUMMARY The parties dispute whether a federal agency’s decision to autho

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ZAHRA ARABZADA, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 23-655 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 8 : ANT