Cases

LANDAU, J. This case is before the court on automatic and direct review of defendant’s judgment of conviction and sentence of death for aggravated murder. ORS 138.012(1). On review, defendant challenges 22 rulings the trial court made during the guilt and penalty phases of his trial. He asks this court to reverse his convictions for aggravated murder and felon in possession of a firearm and remand for a new trial or, alternati

612 June 19, 2014 No. 43 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL SPENCER WASHINGTON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. (CC CR0701950; SC S058490) En Banc On automatic and direct review of the judgment of con- viction and sentence of death imposed by t

Mr. Chief Justice Burger delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari in these cases to decide whether the venue provisions contained in § 2 of the Mandamus and Venue Act of 1962, 28 U. S. C. f 1391 (e), apply to actions *530for money damages brought against federal officials in their individual capacities. 439 U. S. 1113 (1979).

BLUMENFELD, District Judge: This case involves an action by appellant Edward M. Stafford for damages resulting from injuries to person and property sustained in an accident caused by an alleged defect in a tractor truck manufactured by the appellee International Harvester Company (International Harvester) and repaired by the appellee Eastco Truck Sales, Inc. (Eastco). Appellant

Opinion NORCOTT, J. The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that the defendants, the city of New London (city), the New London water and water pollution control authority (New London water authority), the town of Waterford, and the Waterford water pollution control authority (Waterford water authority), are immu

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 55A23 Filed 28 June 2024 JOSEPH ASKEW, CHARLIE GORDON WADE III, and CURTIS WASHINGTON v. CITY OF KINSTON, a municipal corporation On appeal of right of a substantial constitutional question pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(1) of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 287 N.C. App. 222 (2022), vacating an order of summary judgment enter

Case: 20-40359 Document: 00517042176 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/23/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ____________

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 23–1766 Submitted December 18, 2024—Filed June 27, 2025 Eugene Sikora, Appellant, vs. State of Iowa and Beth Skinner, in her official capacity as Director of the Iowa Department of Corrections, Appellees. Appe

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC., BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD, PACIFIC D.C. No. GROSERVICE, INC., DBA Pitco 3:15-md-02670- Foods, CAPITOL HILL DMS-MDD SUPERMARKET, LOUISE ANN DAVIS MATTHEWS, JAMES WALNUM, COLIN MOORE, JENNIFER A. NELSON, OPINION ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG, LAURA CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; T

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC.; BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD; PACIFIC GROSERVICE, D.C. No. INC., DBA Pitco Foods; CAPITOL 3:15-md-02670- HILL SUPERMARKET; LOUISE ANN JLS-MDD DAVIS MATTHEWS; JAMES WALNUM; COLIN MOORE; JENNIFER A. NELSON; ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG; LAURA OPINION CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; TREPCO IMPORTS AND

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC.; BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD; PACIFIC GROSERVICE, D.C. No. INC., DBA Pitco Foods; CAPITOL 3:15-md-02670- HILL SUPERMARKET; LOUISE ANN JLS-MDD DAVIS MATTHEWS; JAMES WALNUM; COLIN MOORE; JENNIFER A. NELSON; ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG; LAURA OPINION CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; TREPCO IMPORTS AND

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Ohio Redistricting Comm., Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-65.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0035p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ STATE OF OKLAHOMA; OKLAHOMA HORSE RACING COMMISSION;

WOOD, Chief Judge. The invention of carbonless copy paper by NCR Corporation in the mid-1950s solved a small problem and created a large one. Though it alleviated the messy side effects of carbon paper for those who wanted copies in the pre-photocopy era, over the next quarter-century it became clear that the cost of this convenience was large-scale environmental contamination. That is because, until the early 1970s, the subst

787 F.Supp.2d 149 (2011) COORS BREWING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Juan Carlos MENDEZ-TORRES, Defendant. Civil No. 06-2150(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 30, 2011. *156 Eric Perez-Ochoa, Katarina Stipec-Rubio, Pedro Jimenez-Rodriguez, Adsuar Muniz Goyco Seda & Perez Ochoa PSC, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff

Maryland Small MS4 Coalition, et al. v. Maryland Department of the Environment No. 25, September Term 2021 Environmental Law – Administrative Law – Clean Water Act – Stormwater Discharge Permits – Stare Decisis. Under the Clean Water Act and a similar State statute, the Maryland Department of the Environment develops and issues permits for regulating stormwater pollution to municipal separate storm sewer systems (“MS4s”) in Maryland. In Maryland Department of the Environment v. Anacostia Riverk

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

*962 BRYSON, Circuit Judge. I Plaintiff Parallel Networks, LLC, is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,446,111 (“the '111 patent”), entitled “Method and Apparatus for Client-Server Communication Using a Limited Capability Client Over a Low-Speed Communications Link.” The application for

OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., District Judge. City of Dearborn Heights Act of 345 Police and Fire Retirement System (“Plaintiff’) filed this action on behalf of itself and all persons who purchased the publicly traded securities of Defendant Abercrombie & Fitch Company (“Abercrombie”) from June 2, 2005 through August 16, 2005 (the “Class Period”). The action was brought against Aber

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-93 No. 62PA21/63PA21 Filed 19 August 2022 ANDERSON CREEK PARTNERS, L.P.; ANDERSON CREEK INN, LLC; ANDERSON CREEK DEVELOPERS, LLC; FAIRWAY POINT, LLC; STONE CROSS, LLC d/b/a/ STONE CROSS ESTATES, LLC; RALPH HUFF HOLDINGS, LLC; WOODSHIRE PARTNERS, LLC; CRESTVIEW DEVELOPMENT, LLC; OAKMONT DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC; WELLCO CONTRACTORS, INC