⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Stanley Hayes”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016-03-30 · Published · cited 0× · 638 F. App'x 530
ORDER Stanley Hayes defaulted on his home mortgage, and in- January 2013 an Illinois court entered a judgment of foreclosure in favor of the Federal National Mortgage Association. A judicial sale was conducted, and the state court approved the sale in September 2013. Hayes brought this action in federal court, ostensibly under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the Federal National Mortgage Association violated the Constitution of the Un
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018-01-19 · Published · cited 116× · 880 F.3d 1228
Case: 15-14830 Date Filed: 01/19/2018 Page: 1 of 50 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-14830 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-20032-DPG-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
District Court, S.D. California · 2012-05-24 · Published · cited 2× · 872 F. Supp. 2d 1002; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72871; 2012 WL 1900110
ORDER HAYES, District Judge. The matters before the Court are the Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation filed by Defendant Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC (ECF No. 9) and the Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff John Simmons (ECF No. 12). I. Background On December 1, 2011, Plaintiff John Simmons initiated this action in the Superior
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-01-31 · Published · cited 0× · 121 N.E.3d 152
Kirsch, Judge. [1] Nyelah M. Hayes ("Hayes") appeals the trial court's revocation of her probation, contending that there was insufficient evidence to support the revocation. [2] We affirm. Facts and Procedural History [3] In June 2017, Hayes pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to resisting la
Hayes v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005-04-27 · Published · cited 33× · 161 S.W.3d 507; 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 652; 2005 WL 957195
161 S.W.3d 507 (2005) Shannon Eugene HAYES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. PD-0191-04. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 27, 2005. Stanley G. Schneider, Houston, for Appellant. David C. Newell, Assist. DA, Richmond, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State. OPINION HERVEY, J., delivered the opinion of the
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-09-24 · Published · cited 7× · 897 F. Supp. 2d 146; 2012 WL 4341808
OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge. In 2009, plaintiff Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO (“Realtime”) sued a number of companies involved in some aspect of the financial services industry (including banks, exchanges, and information services) for infringing three of its patents: U.S. Patent No. 7,417,568 (the “'568 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,714,747 (the “'747 Patent”), and U.S.
Hayes v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2004-01-15 · Published · cited 5× · 124 S.W.3d 781; 2003 WL 22723444
124 S.W.3d 781 (2003) Shannon Eugene HAYES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 01-02-00163-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). November 20, 2003. Rehearing Overruled January 15, 2004. *783 Stanley G. Schneider, Schneider & McKinney, P.C., Houston, TX, for Appellant. John F.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-06-22 · Published · cited 4× · 875 F. Supp. 2d 276
OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge. Plaintiff Realtime Data, LLC (“Real-time”) brought nine lawsuits asserting patent infringement against approximately 18 separate defendants. The defendants break down into three general groups: (i) major financial institutions including Morgan Stanley, Bank of America Corporation, Credit Suisse Holdings (USA), Inc., The Goldman Sachs Group, H
Hayes v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997-12-03 · Published · cited 65× · 493 S.E.2d 169; 268 Ga. 809; 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 4395; 1997 Ga. LEXIS 754
Benham, Chief Justice, dissenting. Finding myself unable to agree with Division 7 of the majority opinion or with the affirmance of Hayes’s conviction, I must respectfully dissent. The majority opinion finds that overwhelming evidence of guilt made it harmless error for the trial court to limit defendant’s closing argument to less time than is provided for by the clear language of OCGA § 17
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004-12-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 17, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STANLEY EARL CATES Appeal from the Criminal Court for Anderson County No. A2CR0086 James B. Scott, Jr., Judge No. E2003-02648-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 20, 2004 The Appellant, Stanley Earl Cates, was convicted by an Anderson County jury
Hayes v. Ridgepublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996-11-06 · Published · cited 2× · 946 F. Supp. 354; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16491; 1996 WL 646708
946 F.Supp. 354 (1996) Timothy HAYES, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Tom RIDGE, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-CV-4941. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 6, 1996. *355 *356 Daniel M. Gray, Swick and Shapiro, Washington, DC, for Timothy Hayes, M.D., Arthur N. Barn
People v. Hayespublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2022-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 IL App (1st) 190881-B
2021 IL App (1st) 190881-B No. 1-19-0881 Opinion filed May 16, 2022 First Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002-09-04 · Published · cited 1× · 249 F. Supp. 2d 725; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22123; 2002 WL 32058354
249 F.Supp.2d 725 (2002) James J. HAYES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and Thomas Boots, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Michael F. Dacey, Stanley A. Hoffberger, Barry L. Miller, Frank B. Rosenberg, Henry A. Rosenberg, Jr., John E. Wheeler, Jr., Jack Africk, Harold Ridley, Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation and Rosemore, Inc., Defendants.
People v. Hayespublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021-12-06 · Published · cited 4× · 196 N.E.3d 545; 458 Ill. Dec. 241; 2021 IL App (1st) 190881
2021 IL App (1st) 190881 No. 1-19-0881 Opinion filed December 6, 2021 First Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
State v. D. Stanleypublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2024-11-19 · Published · cited 6× · 558 P.3d 1147; 419 Mont. 61; 2024 MT 271
11/19/2024 DA 21-0565 Case Number: DA 21-0565 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2024 MT 271 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID STANLEY, Defendant
Hayes v. Turnerpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990-05-15 · Published · cited 10× · 391 S.E.2d 513; 98 N.C. App. 451; 1990 N.C. App. LEXIS 421
391 S.E.2d 513 (1990) 98 N.C. App. 451 Herndon HAYES, Plaintiff, v. Lois TURNER, Defendant. and Marcia MICKENS, Intervenor Plaintiff, v. Herndon HAYES, Intervenor Defendant. No. 8918SC650. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 15, 1990. *514 Ivey, Ivey & Donahue by Robert L. McClellan, Gr
Stanley v. Hayespublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1964-05-28 · Published · cited 12× · 165 So. 2d 84; 276 Ala. 532; 1964 Ala. LEXIS 396
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 534 Plaintiff, Betty Jean Stanley, appeals from a judgment for the defendant following a verdict directed by the trial court in favor of defendant. The complaint as amended alleges that plaintiff "* * * was a guest passenger in a vehicle owned and operated by Defendant's intestate and which said vehicle w
Stanley v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017-02-27 · Published · cited 4× · 300 Ga. 587; 797 S.E.2d 98; 2017 WL 765891; 2017 Ga. LEXIS 88
BENHAM, Justice. Appellant Derrick Stanley appeals his convictions for malice murder and other crimes related to the stabbing death of Doris Murray.1 Appellant and Murray were formerly in a romantic relationship. At the time of Murray’s death, she and appellant were still active in each other’s lives. On May 5, 2008, appellant was helping Murray remove items from her home which had recently susta
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998-01-05 · Published · cited 9× · 988 F. Supp. 1194; 45 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1938; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26; 1998 WL 4676
988 F.Supp. 1194 (1998) STEPHEN & HAYES CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. MEADOWBROOK HOMES, INC., Defendant. No. 97 C 4053. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 5, 1998. *1195 *1196 Patricia Mary Fennell, Joseph Patrick Berglund, Stanley E. Niew, Kathleen
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020-05-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA18-982 Filed: 5 May 2020 North Carolina Industrial Commission, I.C. No. 15-048700 PAMELA LAUZIERE, Employee, Plaintiff, v. STANLEY MARTIN COMMUNITIES, LLC, Employer, and AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier, Defendants. Appeal by Plaintiff from Opinion and Award entered 22 May 2018 by the Full North Carolina Industrial Commission. He