Cases

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER NORMAN A. MORDUE, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff applied for Supplemental'Security Income on behalf of her son, D.M.S., a *384minor child, alleging disability due to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”), oppositional defiant disorder (“ODD”), and a learning disorder. Plaintiff requested a hearing before

RILEY, Circuit Judge. Stanley E. Schultz (Schultz) appeals the district court’s 2 order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits (SSDI) and supplemental security income (SSI) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-434, 1381-1383Í. We affirm. </

60 F.3d 821NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Stanley E. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security,Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-2117.

124 F.3d 217 97 CJ C.A.R. 1801 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Joseph Heller could have written the plot of Brenda White’s struggle to maintain SSI benefits for her disabled son. After being caught between a rock (the Missouri probate court) and a hard place (the Social Security Administration) for nearly four years, Ms. White comes to this Court, asking us to extricate her from the Catch 22 in which she

OPINION AND ORDER HON. R. STEVEN WHALEN, U.S. Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Daniel Richard Shipman brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging a final decision of Defendant Commissioner denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under the Social Security Act. Both parties have filed summary judgment motions. For the reasons set for

OPINION BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge. Valemaria Blankenship (“Blankenship”) appeals the district court’s judgment upholding the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). Blankenship suffers from degenerative joint disease in her feet, which causes, inter alia, neuromas, stress fractures, and breaks requiring outpatient

ORDER Judith Stanley, who claims that she is disabled by back pain and depression, appeals from a district court order upholding the Social Security Administration’s denial of disability insurance benefits. An administrative law judge concluded that she was not disabled because she had the residual functional capacity to work in occupations that account for a significant num*975

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [# 16] and REMANDING ACTION DENISE PAGE HOOD, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris’s Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 16, filed July 30, 2014] In this Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Morris recommended that this Court GRANT Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 10, filed January

MEMORANDUM OPINION SARA LIOI, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp II (Doc. No. 24) with respect to plaintiffs request for judicial review of defendant’s denial of his claim for supplemental security income benefits (“SSI”) and for remand to the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) for further proceedings. Plaintiff filed an objecti

MEMORANDUM CURTIS L. COLLIER, District Judge. Plaintiff Melissa Ren’e Kennedy (“Plaintiff’) brought this action on June 1, 2012 seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) denying Plaintiffs claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1382. The Court referred the matter to United St

MEMORANDUM CURTIS L. COLLIER, District Judge. Plaintiff Robert Hatmaker (“Plaintiff’) brought this action on May 2, 2012, seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) denying Plaintiff a period of disability, disability insurance benefits (“DIB”), and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Ac

OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs Objection (ECF DKT # 18) to the Report and Recommendation (ECF DKT # 16) of Magistrate Judge Limbert who recommended that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiffs Claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). For the following reasons, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Limber

475 F.Supp.2d 813 (2007) James W. STANLEY, Jr. Plaintiff v. Jo Anne BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration Defendant. No. 4:06CV659JMM. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. February 14, 2007. *814 *815 Ralph M. Cloar, Jr., Law Office of Ralph M. Cloar,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DARRIN LENALD COOPER, No. 24-1084 BAP No. Appellant, 1:23-bk-1098 v. OPINION SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Appellee. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff José R. López-Dávila filed a complaint against the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), alleging that the Commissioner’s disability decision was not supported by substantial evidence. Docket No. 2 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff demanded judicial review of the decision so that disability insurance benefits

OPINION DuBOIS, District Judge. Jennifer Garibay appeals from a District Court order affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income Benefits (“SSI”) under the Social Security Act (“SSA”), for the period beginning on July 27, 2003 and continuing through September 28, 2006. Garibay argues that the decision of the Administrative

690 F.Supp.2d 592 (2009) Linda L. CHEEKS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Civil No. 08-15183. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 23, 2009. *594 Lewis M. Seward, Seward, Tally, Bay City, MI, for Plaintiff. Francis L. Ausa Zebot, U.S. Attorney's Office, Detroit,

OPINION DuBOIS, District Judge. Jennifer Garibay appeals from a District Court order affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income Benefits (“SSI”) under the Social Security Act (“SSA”), for the period beginning on July 27, 2003 and continuing through September 28, 2006. Garibay argues that the decision of the Administrative