Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Star Chain, Inc.”
Saul Alvarez v. All Star Boxing, Inc.public domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 23, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D24-0179 & 3D24-1287 Lower Tribunal No. 10-25018 ________________ Saul Alvarez, Appellant,
Alvarez v. All Star Boxing, Inc.public domain
LOGUE, J. Saul Alvarez appeals a final judgment awarding All Star, Inc. $8.5 million for unjust enrichment following a 14-day jury trial. Alvarez argues that the amount of the damages was not based on competent substantial evidence. We agree, reverse, and remand with instructions. BACKGROUND By all accounts, the red-haired, twenty-eight-year-old Saul Alvarez, nicknamed "Canelo," is a rising internat
MIDDLEBROOKS, District Judge: This ease involves a pirated shipment of disk drives, two logistics contracts, and application of the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706, a federal law regulating the interstate transportation of goods. It requires us to address the ability of intermediaries to negotiate limitations on liability, the sufficiency of proof of loss, and the scope o
Jones v. All Star Painting Inc.public domain
Justice Beth Baker delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 Danielle Jones worked as a house painter for All Star Painting, Inc. during the summer of 2014. Two months after quitting her job, she filed a complaint with the Montana Human Rights Bureau (HRB), alleging that the company's owner, Norman Hodges, had sexually harassed her at work. After a contested hearing, the Hearing Officer g
DROGE VS. AAAA TWO STAR TOWING, INC.public domain
136 Nev., Advance Opinion .35 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JAMES H. DROGE, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 75206-COA AND CYNTHIA DROGE, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellants, vs. AAAA TWO STAR TOWING, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION; DONALD JUN 1
Droge v. AAAA Two Star Towing, Inc.public domain
136 Nev., Advance Opinion .35 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JAMES H. DROGE, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 75206-COA AND CYNTHIA DROGE, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellants, vs. AAAA TWO STAR TOWING, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION; DONALD JUN 1
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: It would not be an antitrust opinion without the line that the antitrust laws were designed for “the protection of competition, not competitors.” Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320, 82 S.Ct. 1502, 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). Though often included by rote, the axiom is particularly apt in this case.
Foreman v. Five Star Food Service, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Plaintiff John Foreman has filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 37), to which defendant Five Star Food Service, Inc. (“Five Star”) filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 38), and the plaintiffs filed a Reply (Docket No. 44). Five Star has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 30), to which Foreman and plaintiff Gary R
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge. Plaintiffs in this case are seeking equitable reformation and declaratory judgment with respect to the annual payment required to exercise annual options in the natural gas storage leases under which Plaintiffs are lessors and Defendant Southern Star is lessee. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (
David Martinez v. Lone Star Custard Holdings, LLCpublic domain
NUMBER 13-23-00552-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG DAVID MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. LONE STAR CUSTARD HOLDING, LLC, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 57TH DISTRICT CO
Jessup v. Five Star Franchisingpublic domain
2022 UT App 86 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS HOLDEN JESSUP AND MICHAEL KRISTY, Appellants, v. FIVE STAR FRANCHISING LLC, CHAD JONES, AND D. SCOTT ABBOTT, Appellees. Opinion No. 20210220-CA Filed July 8, 2022 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honora
Cranor v. 5 Star Nutritionpublic domain
Case: 19-51173 Document: 00515876566 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/26/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
In Re Four Star Financial Services, Inc.public domain
444 B.R. 428 (2011) In re FOUR STAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Debtor. No. 2:03-bk-37579-TD. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California. January 28, 2011. *430 Arthur A. Greenberg, Encino, CA, for Debtor. D. Edward Hays, Martina A. Slocomb, Marshack Hays LLP, Irvine, CA, James C. Bastian, Jr., Leonard M. Shulman, Lynda T. Bui,
Schick v. Nation Star Mortgage LLCpublic domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 28-JUN-2022 07:45 AM Dkt. 80 MO
Rock Star Enters., LLC v. Village of Sylvan Beachpublic domain
Rock Star Enters., LLC v Village of Sylvan Beach (2025 NY Slip Op 02523) Rock Star Enters., LLC v Village of Sylvan Beach 2025 NY Slip Op 02523 Decided on April 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law
619 F.3d 1364 (2010) TRI-STAR ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRECI-DIP DURTAL SA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2009-1337. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 9, 2010. *1365 Spencer Persson, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., of Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. On the brief
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: This case arises out of a group of hackers’ breach of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc.’s (“Heartland’s”) data systems, compromising confidential information belonging to customers of the plaintiff banks (together, the “Issuer Banks”). The district court dismissed the Issuer Banks’ claims. The Issuer Banks appeal only the dismissal of their negligence claim. We REVERSE and REMAND for proceedings
Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.public domain
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge RADER. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge DYK. RADER, Chief Judge, Appellant Star Scientific, Inc. (“Star”) appeals the denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) and in the alternative a new trial after a jury verdict of non-infringement and invalidity of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,202,649 (“'649 patent”) and 6
Star Transportation, Inc. v. CSIR Enterprises, Inc.public domain
409 F.Supp.2d 939 (2006) STAR TRANSPORTATION, INC., Plaintiff v. CSIR ENTERPRISES, INC., Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, and Insurer's Unlimited, Inc., Defendants. Insurer's Unlimited, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff v. Insurance Network Services.Com, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. No. 3:04-0426. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. January 9,
653 F.Supp.2d 973 (2009) TRI-STAR THEME BUILDERS, INC./ PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., a joint venture, Plaintiff, v. HAWKEYE-SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa corporation, Defendant. No. CV 07-1049-PHX-JAT. United States District Court, D. Arizona. September 3, 2009. *974 Robert O. Dyer, Wayne B. Ducharme, Polsinelli Shughar