Cases

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 12/10/2021 08:08 AM CST - 147 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports HAUPTMAN, O’BRIEN v. AUTO-OWNERS INS. CO. Cite as 310 Neb. 147 Hauptman, O’Brien, Wolf & Lathro

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 03/30/2021 08:08 AM CDT - 662 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 29 Nebraska Appellate Reports HAUPTMAN, O’BRIEN v. AUTO-OWNERS INS. CO. Cite as 29 Neb. App. 662 Hauptman, O’Brien, Wolf & La

Jeffrey D. Knutilla and Janie S. Knutilla filed a complaint against Alpine Bay Resorts, Inc., and Auto-Owners Insurance Company, claiming $25,000 plus interest, attorney's fees, and costs under a statutory bond and claiming damages due to a bad faith refusal to pay and due to a breach of fiduciary duty. Summary judgment was granted in favor of the Knutillas in the amount of $2,395.86, which the trial court found represented actual loss or damage plus $587.73 in post-judgment interest

Sidney M. Bird appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Auto Owners Insurance Company ("Auto-Owners") on Bird's counterclaim against Auto Owners alleging breach of contract and bad faith refusal to pay an insurance claim and from a judgment in favor of The Insurance Store, Inc., on Bird's claim against it alleging fraud and negligent procurement of insurance. We affirm. The following facts are undisputed: Ruby and Richard Hamm entered into an agreement with Bird to purchase

Federal courts seeking to divine state law and lower state courts are also not in accord. Compare McKenzie v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 260 F.Supp.3d 1150, 1153-54 (D.S.D. 2017) (South Dakota law); Brown v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am.,

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3116 WILLIAM M. WERNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3116 WILLIAM M. WERNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION L. Scott Coogler, United States District Judge Before the Court is Plaintiff Auto-Owners Insurance Company’s (“Auto-Owners”), Motion for Judgment on The Pleadings, or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 30.) Auto-Owners brought this case on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, seeking a declaratory judgment that it does not owe Defendants a defense or indemnification

Dillard, Judge. Auto-Owners Insurance Company (“Auto-Owners”) appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and grant of summary judgment to Jason Neisler on his complaint to recover funds under a dwelling policy that he holds with Auto-Owners. Auto-Owners contends that the trial court erred in (1) ruling that Neisler’s policy covered his claim for certain alleged property damage and loss of rents,

852 N.E.2d 604 (2006) AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. BANK ONE; Bank One Indiana, Corp.; Bank One, N.A., Bank One, Indiana, N.A.; Bank One, Inc., Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A04-0511-CV-647. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 15, 2006. *606 Bruce N. Elliott, Conlin, McKenney & Philbrick, P.C., Ann Arbo

OPINION BRADFORD, Judge. Appellant/Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company appeals following the entry of judgment in favor of Appel-lee/Plaintiff Gary Hughes on his contract claim in the amount of $166,792.83. Auto-Owners contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in denying its summary judgment motion on the basis that Hughes’s suit was barred by a one-year limitation in the relevant insu

703 S.E.2d 168 (2010) Joshua Watson BISSETTE, Plaintiff, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY and Bryan Keith Cothran, Defendants. No. COA09-1721. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 7, 2010. *170 Taylor Law Office, Wilson, by W. Earl Taylor, Jr., for Plaintiff. Brown, Crump, Vanore & Tierney, L.L.P., Raleigh, by

LEWIS, J. This case is before the Court for consideration of a question of Florida law certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to be determinative of a cause pending in that court and for which there appears to be no controlling precedent. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(6), Fla. Const. In Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Southeast Floating Docks, Inc., 682 F.3d 1195 (11t

Peggy Bryant, Judge. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Gregory Coburn, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting the summary judgment motions of defendants-appellees, Donald Kleinhenz, Gianna M. Domine, and Auto-Owners Insurance Company (“Auto-Owners”). Because the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Kleinhenz, rendering potentially pertinent other rulings that the trial court deemed

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Gale and Shelene Halvorson (“the Hal-vorsons”) filed a class action complaint against their automobile insurance company, Auto-Owners Insurance Company (“Auto-Owners”) and its subsidiary, Owners Corporation, for breach of contract and bad faith. The Halvorsons sought to certify a class of all persons covered by Auto-Owners’s medpay or personal injury protec

733 N.W.2d 413 (2007) 274 Mich. App. 407 Jennifer PETERSON, Conservator of the Estate of Tracy Holes, a minor, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellant, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and Hashim Jamal-Hughes, Defendant/Counterplaintiff-Appellee, and Judith Louise Cummings, Defendant. Docket No. 262159. Court of Appeals of Michigan.

By Judge Joanne F. Alper This matter comes before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by plaintiff Airlines Reporting Corporation (henceforth “ARC”). After hearing oral argument on August 4, 2000, and carefully reviewing the pleadings, case law, and facts of this case, the Court sets forth its ruling below. Factual Background Plaintiff, ARC, serves as a national

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BABCOCK, DISTRICT JUDGE This declaratory judgment action is before me on Plaintiff Auto-Owners Insurance Company’s (“Auto-Owners”) Opposed Motion to Compel Appraisal Agreement [Doc. # 18], in which Auto-Owners seeks to compel Defendant Summit Park Townhome Association (“.Summit Park”) to enter into an agreement governing the appraisal process in this case. I have reviewed t

649 F.3d 817 (2011) Carolyn E. SCHUBERT, Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas R. Schubert, deceased, Appellee, v. AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 10-2761. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 14, 2011. Filed: August 12, 2011. *819 Kenneth Raymond Goleaner, argu