Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALEX SHTEYNLYUGER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-2982 (RDM) CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Alex Shteynlyuger, a “licensed physician and a specialist in health eco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FREDERICK C. TROTTER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:19-cv-2008-RCL CENTER FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Frederick C. Trotter sued the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") under the Freedom of Information A

USCA11 Case: 24-10875 Document: 60-1 Date Filed: 12/05/2025 Page: 1 of 45 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10875 ____________________ FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. In March 2003, the state of Minnesota submitted a state plan amendment (“2003 plan amendment”) to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“Medicaid Services” or “CMS”), seeking a $1,529,000 increase in the annual supplemental Medical Assistance payments made by the federal Medicaid program to fourteen county-owned nursing homes. After requesting

495 F.3d 991 (2007) State of MINNESOTA, Petitioner, v. CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES; Leslie V. Norwalk, in her official capacity as Deputy Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; Michael O. Leavitt, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Respondents. No. 06-3263. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth

794 F.Supp.2d 29 (2011) TERRIS, PRAVLIK & MILLIAN, LLP, Plaintiff, v. CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-951 (ESH/JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 29, 2011. *30 Kathleen Lillian Millian, Terris, Pravlik & Millian, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.</

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TERRIS, PRAVLIK & MILLIAN, LLP Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10-951 (ESH/JMF) CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case has been referred to me by Judge Huve

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge The parties' cross-motions for summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on August 23, 2017. Plaintiffs Alameda Health System, County of Contra Costa, Regents of the University of California, County of San Mateo, and County of Santa Clara appeared by their counsel Robert C. Leventhal, and plaintiff County of Santa Clara appeared by its counsel Danny Y. Chou. Defendants

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 21-1297, 21-1379 MEDICAID AND MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION OF PUERTO RICO, INC.; MMM HEALTHCARE, LLC; TRIPLE-S ADVANTAGE, INC.; MCS ADVANTAGE, INC.; HUMANA HEALTH PLANS OF PUERTO RICO, INC., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNÁNDEZ, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Puerto Ri

Filed: October 23, 2008 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1512 (SPA-05-06) THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, Petitioner, v. CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, Respondent. -------------------- NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ELDER LAW ATTORNEYS,

OPINION SCHROEDER, Senior Circuit Judge: These are two appeals stemming from the government’s immediate termination of a Medicare Part D services contract with a prescription drug insurance coverage provider, Plaintiff-Appellant Fox Insurance Company, Inc. The government terminated the contract in March of 2010 after it had warned Fox of delays in pat

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, Defendant and Respondent. S270326 Third Appellate District C089555 Sacramento County Superior Court 34-2018-80002953-CU-WM-GDS July 24, 2023 Justic

Filed 7/27/21 (mod.); Certified for Publication 7/30/21 (order attached following unmodified opinion) NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF

Opinion BLEASE, Acting P. J. —In this appeal from a judgment granting a petition for a supplemental writ of mandate, we must decide whether the State Department of Health Care Services (the Department)1 was required to consider provider costs or otherwise comply with the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Orthopaedic Hospital v. Belshe (9th Cir. 1997) 103 F.3d 1491

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S ENTITLEMENT TO RELIEF OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION In January 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff California Insurance Guarantee Association’s (“CIGA”) motion for partial summary judgment and denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment. (Order, EOF No. 94.) Following that Order, the parties submitted brief

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [63, 68, 87] OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This is an action for judicial review of Medicare reimbursement demands. At various times, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”)—which administers the federal Medicare program and the Medicare Secondary Payer statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1

[Cite as CHS-Lake Erie, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Medicaid, 2020-Ohio-505.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CHS-Lake Erie, Inc. et al., : Appellants-Appellees/ : Cross-Appellants, No. 18AP-897 : (C.P.C. No. 16CV-9766) v.

ORDER Karen L. Litkovitz, United States Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION The State of Ohio’s Medicaid assisted living waiver program pays for home and community-based services provided to qualified low income, elderly individuals who otherwise would require care in an institutional or nursing home environment. The named plaintiffs in this case, Betty Hilleger and Geraldine A. Saunders,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [41] OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief filed by Plaintiff California Insurance Guarantee Association (“CIGA”) against Defendants Sylvia Mathews Bur-well, United States Department of Health & Human Services, and Center for Medicare & Medicaid Ser

ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Nineteen hospitals from Oregon, Nevada, and Arizona challenge California’s Medi-Cal reimbursement policies for out-of-state hospitals. Compl. ¶ 1. Plaintiffs filed this action against California’s Department of Health Care Services in