⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “State of California v. Sanden Holdings Corporation”

State v. Thomaspublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-09-28 · Published · cited 8× · 2020 Ohio 4635
[Cite as State v. Thomas, 2020-Ohio-4635.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2019-L-085 - vs - : JOSEPH L. THOMAS,
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999-03-12 · Published · cited 132× · 729 So. 2d 834; 1999 WL 130282
729 So.2d 834 (1998) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. Katherine K. OWEN. No. 1961950. Supreme Court of Alabama. August 21, 1998. Opinion Modified on Denial of Rehearing March 12, 1999. *835 Micheal S. Jackson and Michael B. Beers of Beers, Anderson, Jackson, Hughes & Patty, P.C., Montgomery, for appell
State v. Sadlerpublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 1899-07-05 · Published · cited 36× · 58 P. 284; 25 Nev. 131
The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 576 F.2d 983
OPINION ANNOUNCING JUDGMENT OF THE COURT VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge. The principal issues in this appeal are whether the jury; charged with determining damages owed by the United States to the Southeastern Pennsylvania Synod of the Lutheran Church in America (“Synod”) for land taken under the power of eminent domain, was properly instructed in the law and whether the jury was sufficiently misled by a rem
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978-03-27 · Published · cited 22× · 576 F.2d 983; 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12000
576 F.2d 983 UNITED STATES of Americav.564.54 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, situated IN MONROE ANDPIKE COUNTIES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, and Benedict F.Pastorini, et al., Southeastern Pennsylvania Synod ofLutheran Camp of America.Appeal of SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA SYNOD OF LUTHERAN CAMP OF AMERICA. No. 77-1238. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit.
Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933-05-12 · Published · cited 0× · 124 Neb. 846; 248 N.W. 388; 1933 Neb. LEXIS 135
Eberly, J. Prior to May 10, 1930, the Citizens State Bank of Wahoo, Nebraska, was conducting a general commercial banking business in that city. On the day mentioned, in a proper proceeding instituted for that purpose, an adjudication of the insolvency of that institution was made *848and a receiver therefor appointed, with direction to liquidate this bank as provided
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014-08-29 · Published · cited 31× · 2014 IL App (1st) 131631
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Plunkett, 2014 IL App (1st) 131631 Appellate Court AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as Caption Subrogee of Michael P. McGrath, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PATRICK PLUNKETT, Individually, and PATRICK PLUNKETT
Lindell v. Kaluginpublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 2013-03-07 · Published · cited 39× · 353 Or. 338; 297 P.3d 1266; 2013 WL 856161; 2013 Ore. LEXIS 153
*340 LANDAU, J. In this personal injury action, defendant Kalugin moved for a defense medical examination pursuant to ORCP 44 A. Plaintiff Lindell objected on the ground that he would not submit to such an examination without being allowed to bring a friend, family member, or counsel with him. The trial c
Lindell v. Kaluginpublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 2013-03-07 · Published · cited 0×
338 March 7, 2013 No. 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Paul G. LINDELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Relator, v. Alex KALUGIN, Defendant, and COUNTRYSIDE CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Oregon corporation, Defendant-Adverse Party. (CC CV10040946; SC S059437)
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007-05-23 · Published · cited 88× · 21 Vet. App. 232; 2007 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 780; 2007 WL 1498675
On Appeal from the Board of Veterans’ Appeals PER CURIAM: The appellant, veteran Robert J. Ingram, appeals through counsel a December 12, 2003, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied entitlement to an effective date earlier than April 15, 1992, for the grant of compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of a pneumo
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007-01-22 · Published · cited 12× · 477 F.3d 616; 67 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 235; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1327
477 F.3d 616 FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, as Trustee of the Southeast Timber Leasing Statutory Trust, Appellant,v.PICTET OVERSEAS TRUST CORP., LTD., Trustee of Henrietta Y. Jones Trust, Appellee. No. 05-2932. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 25, 2006. Filed: January 22, 2007.
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 887 F. Supp. 1469
*1471OPINION (Forum Non Conveniens) POINTER, Chief Judge. The defendants seek to dismiss, on the ground of forum non conveniens, seven of the more than 10,000 breast-implant products liability cases pending in this court, based on diversity jurisdiction, as a result of initial filing here or of § 1407 multi-dist
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010-06-14 · Published · cited 38× · 720 F. Supp. 2d 978; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59013; 2010 WL 2403031
720 F.Supp.2d 978 (2010) FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BURNHAM MORTGAGE, INC., Exeter Title Company, Ticor Title Insurance Company, James C. Peddle, Derrick Davis, Eric C. Vehovc, Market Value Appraisal, Inc., Maya N. Jordan, Larry D. Burkes, Kevin R. Brisker, John Jeffrey Hlava, Adam Bat, Adam Butar, Zbigniew Rymarz, Waldemar Florkiewicz, Dorothy Spann, Charlene Adams, Kuba Jasny, a/k/a Grosz Piotr, Barbara Odrzywolska, Marek Maka,
North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995-12-29 · Published · cited 38× · 541 N.W.2d 449; 1995 N.D. LEXIS 235; 1995 WL 763669
541 N.W.2d 449 (1995) SIGNAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Raymond A. LAMB, Defendant and Appellee. SIGNAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FIRST BANK SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant and Appellee. Civ. Nos. 950069, 950070. Supreme Court of North Dakota. December 29, 1995.
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003-04-24 · Published · cited 11× · 103 S.W.3d 31; 2003 Ky. LEXIS 77; 2003 WL 1936626
103 S.W.3d 31 (2003) METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Robert B. OVERSTREET, Judge, Scott Circuit Court, Appellee, and Gary Afterkirk, Sylvia Banks; and Chris Heard, d/b/a Lexington Motors (Real Parties in Interest), Appellees. No. 2002-SC-0032-MR. Supreme Court of Kentucky. April 24, 2003. *32
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996-05-03 · Published · cited 19× · 195 B.R. 1019; 35 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1446; 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 543; 1996 WL 277256
195 B.R. 1019 (1996) In re The ELDER-BEERMAN STORES CORP., et al., Debtors. The ELDER-BEERMAN STORES CORP., Plaintiff, v. THOMASVILLE FURNITURE INDUS. INC., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 95-33643. Adv. No. 96-3047. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. May 3, 1996. Richard M. Cieri, Cleveland, Ohio, for debtor. Lawrence E. Oscar, Hahn L
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 25, 1999 Session ROBERT VAUGHN ODOM v. MARY JO ODOM Appeal from the Chancery Court for Dickson County No. 3564-94 Allen W. Wallace, Judge No. M1999-02811-COA-R3-CV Filed December 5, 2001 This appeal involves a bitter cust
Lick v. Dahlpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979-11-28 · Published · cited 16× · 285 N.W.2d 594; 10 A.L.R. 4th 645; 1979 S.D. LEXIS 302
285 N.W.2d 594 (1979) John LICK and Doris Lick, on behalf of themselves and all other property owners and taxpayers in the County of Roberts and State of South Dakota, similarly situated, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Irene DAHL, Treasurer of Roberts County and Roberts County, Defendants and Appellants. Nos. 12550, 12570. Supreme Court of South Dakota. November 28, 1979.
California Supreme Court · 1976-05-20 · Published · cited 29× · 549 P.2d 846; 16 Cal. 3d 905; 130 Cal. Rptr. 14; 1976 Cal. LEXIS 267
Opinion RICHARDSON, J. In this case we decide, among other issues, whether the plaintiff in a personal injury action may insist upon the presence of his counsel at an examination conducted by defendant’s psychiatrist. We conclude that such a psychiatric examination should occur in the presence of the examiner and the examinee alone. In the pres
District Court, S.D. New York · 2003-08-08 · Published · cited 31× · 274 F. Supp. 2d 481; 2003 WL 21757706
274 F.Supp.2d 481 (2003) MOTOROLA CREDIT CORPORATION and Nokia Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Kemal UZAN, et al., Defendants. No. 02 CIV.666 JSR. United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 31, 2003. As Corrected August 8, 2003. *489 Steven Davidson, Gordon M. Clay, John O'Connor, Howard Stahl, Steptoe & J