⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “State of Texas v. Donald J. Trump”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-07-10 · Published · cited 2× · 930 F.3d 209
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: The District of Columbia and the State of Maryland commenced this action against Donald J. Trump in his official capacity as President of the United States and in his individual capacity, alleging that he violated the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution. This action is the same as that which we address in appeal No. 18-2486, also d
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-02-15 · Published · cited 42× · 883 F.3d 233
TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I agree with my dissenting colleagues insofar as they hold that the plaintiffs lack standing to assert their claims under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Accordingly, I do not reach the merits of those claims. With regard to the plaintiffs' claim that Proclamation No. 9,645 likely violates the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution, I believe they have sta
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-12-22 · Published · cited 10× · 878 F.3d 662
OPINION PER CURIAM: For the third time, we are called upon to assess the legality of the President’s efforts to bar over 150 million nationals of six designated countries 1 from entering the United States or being issued immigrant visas that they w
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-06-12 · Published · cited 3× · 859 F.3d 741; 2017 WL 2529640; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10356
OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-04-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-960 (RDM) DONALD TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs—the states of California, Oregon, and Minnesota—challenge Executive Order 13,771 and the implementing G
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued July 7, 2025 Decided August 13, 2025 No. 25-5097 GLOBAL HEALTH COUNCIL, ET AL., APPELLEES v. DONALD J. TRUMP, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., APPELLANTS Consolidated with 25-5098 Appeals from the Uni
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Decided August 8, 2025 No. 25-5124 J.G.G., ET AL., APPELLEES v. DONALD J. TRUMP, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., APPELLANTS Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5217 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00766-JEB Filed On: August 8, 2025 J.G.G., et al., Appellees v. Donald J. Tru
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-09-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 20-cv-2340(EGS) DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiffs, the States of New York, Hawaii, and New Jersey; the City of New York; and the City
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5067 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00766-JEB Filed On: March 26, 2025 J.G.G., et al., Appellees v. Do
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 134 F.4th 545
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EAST BAY SANCTUARY No. 23-16032 COVENANT; CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER; D.C. No. 4:18-cv- TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER; 06810-JST NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS; IMMIGRANT DEFENDERS LAW CENTER; ORDER AMERICAN GATEWAYS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States; PAMELA BONDI, Attorney Genera
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025-02-18 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2332 ___________________________ State of Missouri; State of Arkansas; State of Florida; State of Georgia; State of North Dakota; State of Ohio; State of Oklahoma Plaintiffs - Appellees
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-04-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES ) UNION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-0935 (PLF)
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025-10-16 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-2798 STATE OF ILLINOIS and the CITY OF CHICAGO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Dist
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-02-09 · Published · cited 253× · 847 F.3d 1151; 2017 WL 526497; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2369
ORDER PER CURIAM: At issue in this emergency proceeding is Executive Order 13769, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States,” which, among other changes to immigration policies and procedures, bans for 90 days the entry into the United States of individuals from seven countries. Two States challenged the Executive Order a
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022-09-27 · Published · cited 0×
20-3977 (L) E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 _______________ 4 August Term 2021 5 (Argued: December 3, 2021 Decided: September 27, 2022) 6 Docket Nos. 20-3977-cv (L), 20-3978-cv (Con) 7 ______
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued July 7, 2025 Decided August 13, 2025 Reissued August 28, 2025 No. 25-5097 GLOBAL HEALTH COUNCIL, ET AL., APPELLEES v. DONALD J. TRUMP, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., APPELLANTS
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2020-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 WI 91
2020 WI 91 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP2038 COMPLETE TITLE: Donald J. Trump, Michael R. Pence and Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph R. Biden, Kamala D. Harris, Milwaukee County Clerk c/o George L. Christen
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-02-04 · Published · cited 0× · 127 F.4th 606
Case: 23-40671 Document: 135-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/04/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-40671
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2020-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 WI 91
2020 WI 91 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP2038 COMPLETE TITLE: Donald J. Trump, Michael R. Pence and Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph R. Biden, Kamala D. Harris, Milwaukee County Clerk c/o George L. Christen