Cases

PER CURIAM. ¶1 Justin Robert White appeals an amended judgment of conviction entered on February 3, 2017. He also appeals a circuit court order entered January 2, 2018, denying postconviction relief. He claims that certain language in the amended judgment of conviction must be removed because the language was derived from a statute that does not apply to him, does not reflect the sentencing court's order, and was inserted by the cle

Affirmed.

Affirmed

The subsequent treatment of the land in question does support the conclusion that the Oneida reservation was diminished, however. The numerous statements of federal officials referring to the "former reservation," even if ambiguous as to disestablishment, at least manifest the view that the original boundaries were no longer intact. Just as in Stockbridge-Munsee , "the land became subject to state taxes, and the Department of the Interior refused t

Affirmed

Affirmed/ reversed/ remanded

784 N.W.2d 182 (2010) 2010 WI App 46 STATE v. WHITE[1]. No. 2009AP413-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. February 3, 2010. Unpublished Opinion Affirmed. NOTES [1] Petition for Review Filed.

771 N.W.2d 929 (2009) 2009 WI App 110 STATE v. WHITE[1]. No. 2008AP2080-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. June 23, 2009. Unpublished opinion. Affirmed. NOTES [1] Petition for Review Filed.

300 F.Supp.2d 1210 (2003) STATE OF WISCONSIN INVESTMENT BOARD, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated. Plaintiffs, v. Harold RUTTENBERG, et al., Defendants. George W. Massey, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Harold Ruttenberg, et. al., Defendants. No. CV-99-BE-3097-S, CV-99-BE-3129-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama,

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 801 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 802 ¶ 1 The issue on this appeal is whether the circuit court properly dismissed a criminal charge added in the information b

735 N.W.2d 193 (2007) 2007 WI App 162 STATE v. WHITE.[1] No. 2006AP1746-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. May 8, 2007. Unpublished opinion. Affirmed. NOTES [1] Petition for Review Filed.

277 Wis.2d 580 (2004) 2004 WI App 237 690 N.W.2d 880 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Miyosha K. WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-1211-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs November 1, 2004. Decided November 16, 2004. On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was su

271 Wis.2d 742 (2004) 2004 WI App 78 680 N.W.2d 362 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,[†] v. Richard G. WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-1132-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs February 4, 2004. Decided March 2, 2004. On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cau

469 F.Supp.2d 655 (2007) State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, v. AMGEN, INC., Abbott Laboratories, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Astrazeneca, LP, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aventis Behring, LLC, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,Boehringer Ingelheim Roxane, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Dey, Inc., Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Glaxosmithkline, Inc., Immunex Corporation, Ivax

771 N.W.2d 930 (2009) 2009 WI App 110 STATE EX REL. WHITE v. CHISHOLM[1]. No. 2008AP2649. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. June 16, 2009. Unpublished opinion. Affirmed. NOTES [1] Petition for Review Filed.

237 Wis.2d 699 (2000) 2000 WI App 147 615 N.W.2d 667 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David Carneal WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-0577-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs March 7, 2000. Decided April 4, 2000. *700 On behalf of the

739 N.W.2d 490 (2007) 2007 WI App 216 STATE EX REL. WHITE v. McCASH. No. 2005AP3106. Wisconsin Court of Appeals. August 14, 2007. Unpublished opinion. Affirmed.

639 F.3d 331 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tremaine WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-1764. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued December 2, 2010. Decided April 6, 2011. *333 Mark T. Karner (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Rockford, IL, for Pl

Cite as: 595 U. S. ____ (2022) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 21A471 _________________ WISCONSIN LEGISLATURE, ET AL. v. WISCONSIN ELECTIONS COMMISSION, ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF [March 23, 2022] PER CURIAM. Because o

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Charles White, Felicia Ford, and Norton Helton were three players in a major mortgage fraud ■ scheme. Charles White was the scheme’s mastermind and principal. Through fraudulent mortgage loan applications, he obtained financing for straw purchasers to buy properties from homeowners on the brink of foreclosure. Unbeknownst to the owners, White’s goal was not