⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

13 opinions for “Stephanie A Cascio”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 NY Slip Op 05388
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2021 NY Slip Op 05388) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law  468-a
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-01-16 · Published · cited 0× · 125 F.4th 1352
Appellate Case: 23-7047 Document: 83-1 Date Filed: 01/16/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 16, 2025
LoCascio v. Sharpepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009-10-28 · Published · cited 0× · 23 So. 3d 1209; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16067; 2009 WL 3448111
SALTER, J. In these tragic cases, we address the remedies available to a sole surviving son following the murder of his mother by his father and uncle. The appellant in each case is Edward J. LoCascio (Son). The murder victim was Silvia LoCascio, and the co-conspirators convicted of first-degree murder are her then-husband1 Edward S. LoCascio and brother-in-law Michael LoCascio.
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977-12-19 · Published · cited 0× · 353 So. 2d 999; 1977 La. LEXIS 6780
MARCUS, Justice. Allied Supermarkets, Inc., doing business as K-Mart Food Stores, was charged by bill of information with 127 separate counts of misrepresenting the price and quantity of a commodity, to-wit: 127 different packages of beef, pork and poultry, sold and offered for sale to actual and prospective customers in violation of La.R.S. 55:15(A). Defendant corporation pleaded guilty as charged through counsel and was se
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-06-07 · Published · cited 11× · 222 So. 3d 1017; 2017 WL 2457368; 2017 La. App. LEXIS 1069
BROWN, C.J. I Roth parties in this tort action have appealed from the trial court’s judgment entered in accordance with a jury verdict awarding plaintiff $20 million in damages for “destruction of business” and “loss of future profits.” For the reasons set forth *1021below, we reverse and render judgment in favor of defendants. BRIEF PROCEDURAL
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ENHABIT, INC.; ADVANCED ) HOMECARE MANAGEMENT, ) LLC; and ENCOMPASS HEALTH ) CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0837-LWW ) NAUTIC PARTNERS IX
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2025-02-18 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LORI W. WILL LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 Februa
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-04-15 · Published · cited 3× · 163 So. 3d 817; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 749; 2015 WL 1651810
MOORE, J. | TLaurie Watson appeals a judgment that sustained exceptions of prescription and dismissed her medical malpractice claim. The issue is whether she filed her request for a medical review panel (“MRP”) within one year from the date of discovery of the alleged act, omission or neglect, as required by La. R.S. 9:5628 A. Discerning no manifest error, we affirm. Factual Background
State v. Odenbaughpublic domain
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011-12-06 · Published · cited 84× · 82 So. 3d 215; 2011 La. LEXIS 2888; 2011 WL 6034516
82 So.3d 215 (2011) STATE of Louisiana v. Lee Roy ODENBAUGH, Jr. No. 2010-KA-0268. Supreme Court of Louisiana. December 6, 2011. Rehearing Denied January 20, 2012. *224 The Capital Appeals Project, Bidish J. Sarma, Michael Admirand, Sarah Lynn Ottinger, New Orleans, LA, Law Office of William M. Sothern, William M
Bridges v. Wilcoxonpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001-05-09 · Published · cited 3× · 786 So. 2d 264; 2001 WL 487434
786 So.2d 264 (2001) Nora E. BRIDGES, et al, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Thomas D. WILCOXON, Sr., et al, Defendants-Appellees. No. 34,660-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. May 9, 2001. *265 Degravelles, Palmintier, Holthaus & Fruge', L.L.P. by Michael C. Palmintier, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellants
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-03-10 · Published · cited 25× · 114 F. Supp. 3d 110; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29183; 2015 WL 1035350
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge. This is an employment discrimination action in which the plaintiffs allege that their former employers, defendants Gold*114man, Sachs & Co. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (collectively, “Goldman Sachs” or the “defendants”), denied them equal compensation and
Wehbe v. Waguespackpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998-10-28 · Published · cited 15× · 720 So. 2d 1267; 1998 WL 781958
720 So.2d 1267 (1998) Michael WEHBE and Hiyam Wehbe v. Thomas WAGUESPACK and Harry Lee, in His Capacity as Sheriff of Jefferson Parish. No. 98-CA-475. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. October 28, 1998. *1269 Terry B. Loup, New Orleans, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Kenneth C. Fonte, Metairie, for Defendant-Appellant.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990-08-22 · Published · cited 4× · 566 So. 2d 1052; 1990 WL 122934
566 So.2d 1052 (1990) Roger G. LEE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 21613-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 22, 1990. Writ Denied November 26, 1990. *1053 Davenport Files & Kelly by Thomas W. Davenport, Jr., Monroe, for