Cases

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

557 N.W.2d 102 (1996) Donald D. CONKLIN, Employee, by Charlene JOHNSON-CONKLIN, Spouse, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MacMILLAN OIL COMPANY, Employer, U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Insurance Carrier, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-1712. Court of Appeals of Iowa. October 25, 1996. *103 David S. Wiggins of Wiggins, Anderson & Con

458 F.3d 726 Sidney JAMES, on behalf of Dominic JAMES, Deceased, and on his own behalf, Appellant,v.Alysha FRIEND, Kristy Hardy, Charlene Valade, Melissa Ridenhour, Appellees. No. 05-2008. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 12, 2006. Filed: August 10, 2006. T

ORDER PER CURIAM. Plaintiff appeals from judgments entered in defendants’ favor in her action based on unjust enrichment and conversion. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I BOARD OF EXAMINERS In the Matter of the JULY 2010 EXAMINATION FOR ADMISSION -r ", TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I c

[Cite as State v. Railey, 2024-Ohio-5502.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-230559 TRIAL NO. B-1904865 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : DEMETRIUS RAILEY, : OPINION Defendan

19 F.Supp.2d 567 (1998) BUCKHANNON BOARD AND CARE HOME, INC., The West Virginia Residential Board and Care Home Association, Daisy Layman, by her next friend, Faye Byers, Dorsey Pierce, by her next friend, Lockie J. Marple, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES, Gretchen O. Lewis, Secretary, Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification, Nancy Tyler, Director,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHANIE SEAGRAVES; No. 25-3282 BELINDA BRONS; BENJAMIN D.C. No. LUPO; CHARLENE RAMIREZ; 3:24-cv-05081- JAMES WILSON; KRISTIN TMC ROWLAND; LAURA COOK; MARY AHERN; MICHELLE WHITLOW; MELINDA OPINION ALEXANDER; PAULENE DOUGHTERY; SANDRA RUCH; SPENCER MOOE

350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf

ORDER Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB’s (“Wilmington”), individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Motion for Class Certification1 (Doc. 32) to which Defendants Business Law Group, P.A. (“BLG”), LM Funding, LLC (“LMF”), and Bruce Rodgers (collectively “

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALL PLAINTIFFS REPRESENTED BY JOHN DRISCOLL, Plaintiffs, v. No. 20-cv-622-ZMF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION From 2006 to 2011, sixty-three terrorist attacks on U.S. military service members and civilians in Iraq killed forty-six and seve

669 F.3d 928 (2011) In re NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION. Joe McMurray, Rev.; Charlene Mann, Rev.; Michael Reusch, Dr.; Trudy Bond, Dr.; Robert Newby, Prof.; Serge Popper; Thomas S. Dwyer; James Van-Alstine; Michele Rosen; Theodore Jonathan Morris; Sharon Ann Morris; Harris Sondak; Merrilyn Rome; Brad Marston; Greg L. Smith; Michael Brooks; Michael S. Rothmel; Ilene Pruett; Anthony Bartelemy; Linda Gettier; Stephanie M

DATE: 03/16/2016 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 08:44:17 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 08312015 GROUP 2 _____________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jean Francis, a Seventh Day Adventist, has sued Thomas Perez, Secretary of the Department of Labor (“DOL”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. She alleges that she was discriminated against by her superiors

MARC E, JOHNSON, Judge. | fiPlaintiffs/Appellants, Keela Hawkins, et al., appeal the sustaining of a declinato-ry exception of lack of jurisdiction, the granting of a motion .to strike and the denial of a motion for new trial-in favor of Defendants/Appellees, Willow Incorporated (hereinafter referred to .as “Willow, Inc.”) and National Home Insurance Company (A Risk Retention Group) (hereinafter referred to as “NHIC

2018 UT App 101 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. CHANDRA PARRY OLIVER, Appellant. Opinion No. 20160582-CA Filed June 7, 2018 Third District Court, West Jordan Department The Honorable Charlene Barlow

2020 IL App (1st) 191648 No. 1-19-1648 Opinion filed September 14, 2020 First Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINO

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Repor

William J. Martinez, United States District Judge By way of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, this lawsuit addresses whether John Patrick Walter *1203("Walter") received unconstitutionally deficient medical care while in pretrial detention

ORDER KOVACHEVICH, Chief Judge. The following cases have been consolidated for the limited purposes of addressing Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count III. In Case No. 96-1683, the motion is Dkt. 9; in Case No. 96-1689, the motion is Dkt. 10; in Case No. 96 — 1695, the motion is Dkt. 7; in Case No. 96-1698, the motion is Dkt. 7; in Case No. 96-1701, the motion is Dkt. 7; in Case No. 96-1707, the mo