Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Stephanie M. Garcia”
Ramon J. Garcia, M.D. v. Stephanie Allenpublic domain
02-10-077-CV COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTR
Ramon J. Garcia, M.D. v. Stephanie Allenpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00077-CV RAMON J. GARCIA, APPELLANT M.D. V. STEPHANIE ALLEN APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT
Opinion issued February 27, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00933-CV ——————————— STEPHANIE GARCIA AND JOSE MONSEBIAZ, II INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIED OF J.M., A MINOR CHILD, Appellants/Cross Appellees V
Garcia v. Allenpublic domain
337 S.W.3d 366 (2011) Ramon J. GARCIA, M.D., Appellant, v. Stephanie ALLEN, Appellee. No. 02-10-00077-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. February 10, 2011. Rehearing En Banc Overruled March 10, 2011. *367 T. Marc Calvert, Weston L. Hall, Calvert & Associates, Houston, for Appellant. Constance M
NUMBER 13-23-00105-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG CHRISTINE NICOLE TORRES, Appellant, v. STEPHANIE GARCIA, MAX GALVAN, AND JUAN R. GARCIA, Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 8
Christopher Ehrhardt v. Stephanie Garciapublic domain
Opinion issued October 4, 2012. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00371-CV ——————————— IN RE C.E. On Appeal from the 25th Judicial District Court Colorado Co
Stephanie Garcia v. Comm. of Social Securitypublic domain
OPINION MURGUIA, Circuit Judge: Stephanie Garcia appeals from the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s (the “Commissioner”) denial of benefits on the basis that she was not intellectually disabled. Garcia argues that the administrative law judge (ALJ) who determined that she was not disabled had a duty to develop the record because that record did not include a complete s
STEPHANIE M. PHILIPP, PA v. McCreedypublic domain
298 S.W.3d 682 (2009) STEPHANIE M. PHILIPP, P.A., Robert A. Frolichstein, M.D., and Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio, Ltd., L.L.P., d/b/a Southwest Texas Medical Hospital, Appellants, v. Jennifer Lynn McCREEDY, Appellee. No. 04-08-00922-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. July 29, 2009. *684 Christopher J. Deeve
United States v. Garciapublic domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Appellant Johnny Ray Garcia appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained through two court-ordered wiretaps. Specifically, Appellant contends the district court erred in finding that the wiretaps were necessary and were appropriately minimized as required by 18 U.S.C. § 2518(l)(c), (3)(e), (5) (1994 & Supp.1999). For
People v. Garciapublic domain
Filed 9/8/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E083552 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF1702362) MANUEL WILLIAM GARCIA, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.
In the Interest of J. M. B.public domain
501 S.E.2d 259 (1998) 231 Ga. App. 875 In the Interest of J.M.B., a child. No. A98A0695. Court of Appeals of Georgia. April 1, 1998. Thomas J. Killeen, Athens, for appellant. Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, *260 Shalen A. Sgrosso, Stephanie M. Baldauff
REVERSE AND RENDER and Opinion Filed November 5, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01372-CV CENTRAL REFINING, L.L.C., Appellant V. AARON CALDERON A/K/A AARON GARCIA, ANA GARCIA, STEPHANIE GARCIA, AND JERE CORPORATION D/B/D ZONA CALIENTE SPORTS BAR, Appellees
Phillip Hartsfield v. Stephanie Dorethypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1736 PHILLIP HARTSFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STEPHANIE DORETHY, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the N
Phillip Hartsfield v. Stephanie Dorethypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1736 PHILLIP HARTSFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STEPHANIE DORETHY, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the N
Stephanie Johnson v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schoolspublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1819 STEPHANIE JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of A.J.; STEPHANIE JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of T.S., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION; CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
JUAN GARCIA v. JESSICA ADDAMSpublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JUAN GARCIA, Appellant, v. JESSICA ADDAMS, and STEPHANIE M. SHOWE (Adoption Entity/Intervenor) Appellees. No. 4D21-1390 [February 24, 2022] Appeal from the Circuit Court for th
Phillip Hartsfield v. Stephanie Dorethypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1736 PHILLIP HARTSFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STEPHANIE DORETHY, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the N
Larry Flynt v. Stephanie K. Shimazupublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LARRY C. FLYNT; HAIG KELEGIAN, No. 17-17318 SR.; HAIG T. KELEGIAN, JR., Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-02831- v. JAM-EFB STEPHANIE K. SHIMAZU, in her official capacity as the Director of OPINION the California
United States v. Stephanie Donellipublic domain
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Defendant Stephanie Donelli appeals the 60-month prison sentence she received after pleading guilty to wire fraud and tax evasion. She argues that the district court made a procedural error by failing to address her diagnosis of a mental illness, bipolar II disorder, which Donelli now calls a “principal argument in mitigation.” S
Stephanie Sharp v. S&S Activewear, L.L.C.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHANIE SHARP; CYNTHIA No. 21-17138 MARTINEZ; PATRICIA SPEIGHT; LAURA VIRAMONTES GARCIA; D.C. No. REBECCA GAROUTTE; 3:20-cv-00654- ANTHONY BAKER; SHARENE MMD-CLB WAGONER; RUBY LOPEZ COLOCHO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. S&S ACTIVEWEAR, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from