Cases

Justice BROWN delivered the opinion of the Court. This case involves the attempted sale of two pieces of real estate in downtown San Antonio — the Rivercenter Mall and the ground beneath the San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk hotel. After a deal to sell the properties fell through, the seller sued its tenant — the hotel owners — over actions the seller believed

220 Cal.App.3d 48 (1990) 269 Cal. Rptr. 368 JOHN COE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; IRWIN MEMORIAL BLOOD BANK, Real Party in Interest. MARY PINEDO et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; IRWIN MEMORIAL BLOOD BANK, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. A048198. Co

LEAR, Judge. Plaintiff, Kathleen Dusenbery, filed suit, individually and as natural tutrix of her two minor daughters, for damages for the wrongful death of plaintiffs’ husband and father in an accident on an oil rig. Several defendants were named, among them the partnership and/or joint venture of Bur-mont Company and McMoRan Exploration Co. (herein referred to as “Burmont/McMo-Ran”); McMoRan Exploration Co.1<

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 12a0386p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - Nos. 08-1387/1534

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: These are appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee, Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”), based upon a limitations-period defense. We reverse. BACKGROUND Appellants William and Terry Noah, James and Patricia House, Cheryl Mon-dheim, and George and Mary Lou Giakou-makis (collectively, the “Homeowners”) all own homes,

*580MEMORANDUM * This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, dismissing 116 consolidated suits on forum non conve-niens grounds. This litigation arises out of a 2008 airplane accident in Madrid, in which a Spa-nair flight crashed on takeoff, killing 154 people

In re The Joint Venture of Bur-mont/McMoRan, Burmont Company, and McMoRan Exploration Company, applying for certiorari, or writ of review. Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Terrebonne. Thirty-second Judicial District Court. No. 55494. Granted in part and denied in part. (See Order Attached). Writ is granted as to the indemnity issue only, (Assignment # 2). Otherwise denied.

In re Hart, Inc., applying for writ of certiorari and/or review. First Circuit Court of Appeal. Thirty-Second Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne. No. 55494. Denied. CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.

BYE, Circuit Judge. Sally Higgins, a Native American, was employed by the District of South Dakota (DSD) as an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA). After her resignation, Higgins brought an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2000e-17 (Title VII) alleging racial discrimination and retaliation. The district court

995 A.2d 672 (2010) 414 Md. 334 PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, Maryland et al. v. Cleveland BRENT. No. 71 September Term, 2009. Court of Appeals of Maryland. May 17, 2010. *673 Rajesh A. Kumar, Special Counsel (Stephanie P. Anderson, County Atty., and Mary C. Crawford, Deputy County Atty., Upper Marlboro, MD), on

150 P.3d 409 (2006) 210 Or. App. 8 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Michael FUGATE, Appellant. CR030051; A122496. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted July 31, 2006. Decided December 20, 2006. *411 Stephanie Hortsch, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. On the

DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________

[Cite as State v. Fields, 2013-Ohio-3031.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 25461 v. : T.C. NO. 12CR936 SAMUEL J. FIELDS : (Criminal appeal from Common Pleas Co

ZINTER, Justice. [¶ 1.] A jury found Kenneth C. Huber (Huber) guilty of first degree murder in connection with the shooting death of his wife, Pam Huber. The only dispute was whether the shooting was accidental or intentional. The State’s theory was that Huber, a former chief of police, was an expert marksman who was too well-trained in the safe-handling of handguns for the shooti

JACOBS, Circuit Judge. John Kilgour Lentell and Brett and Juliet Raynes, as lead plaintiffs for purchasers of the publicly traded stock of two internet companies, appeal from the dismissal by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Pollack, J.) of their securities-fraud actions against Merrill Lynch & Co. and its former star analyst, Henry M. Blodget (collectively, “Merrill Lynch,”

ORDER PITMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. I write to resolve four of the remaining discovery disputes in this matter. *371I. HBO’s Objections to the Special Master’s Decision and Order On October 14, 2010, Devin F. Ryan, Esq., the Special Master in this matter, issued a Decision and Orde

669 F.3d 928 (2011) In re NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION. Joe McMurray, Rev.; Charlene Mann, Rev.; Michael Reusch, Dr.; Trudy Bond, Dr.; Robert Newby, Prof.; Serge Popper; Thomas S. Dwyer; James Van-Alstine; Michele Rosen; Theodore Jonathan Morris; Sharon Ann Morris; Harris Sondak; Merrilyn Rome; Brad Marston; Greg L. Smith; Michael Brooks; Michael S. Rothmel; Ilene Pruett; Anthony Bartelemy; Linda Gettier; Stephanie M

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE TRUSTEE NEIL P. OLACK, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the Court for trial on November 20 and 22, 2013 (the “Trial”) on the Complaint (the “Complaint”) (Adv. Dkt. 1)1 filed by Derek A. Henderson, the chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”), and Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, LLC and Macey, Aleman, Hyslip

OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: Joe McMurray and other residential telephone and internet customers (collectively “McMurray”) appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their complaint against government officials and a group of telecommunications companies. McMurray challenges section 802 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”) as an unconstitutional taking under the Fifth Amendment. Sec

667 F.3d 363 (2011) Ines LOMANDO, as Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Laura Lomando, deceased, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America; Stephanie Reynolds, D.O.; Trevor Talbert, M.D.; David Hyppolite, M.D.; Parker Family Health Center; Riverview Medical Center; Emergency Physician Associates North Jersey, PC; John Doe, # 1 Through # 5, Mary Moe # 1 through # 5, and XYZ Corporation # 1 through # 5 (fictitious names representing unknow