Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Stephanie Marie Torres”
Torres v. Mid-State Trust IIpublic domain
OPINION This is a suit for damages under the Texas Consumer Credit Code. Appellant, Mary E. *Page 830 Torres, sued appellees, Larry Hyden and Mid-State Trust II, based upon an acceleration letter demanding that she pay $445,580.91 as the unpaid balance on a retail installment contract. Appellees moved for summary judgment on the grounds of bona fide error and that Hyden had sent the letter in his capacity
Torres v. New York State Board of Electionspublic domain
STRAUB, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to peer inside New York State’s political clubhouses and determine whether party leaders have arrogated to themselves a choice that belongs to the people. The task falls to us by way of interlocutory appeal. Specifically, defendants-appellants appeal from the grant of a preliminary injunction by the District Court for the Eastern District of New York (John Gleeson, Judge).
Preterm-Cleveland v. Stephanie McCloudpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0083p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PRETERM-CLEVELAND; PLANNED PARENTHOOD
Preterm-Cleveland v. Stephanie McCloudpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0083p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PRETERM-CLEVELAND; PLANNED PARENTHOOD
Velazquez Torres, Roberto v. Lopez Del Pozo, Diana Opublic domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL (VII) ROBERTO VELÁZQUEZ CERTIORARI TORRES Procedente del Tribunal de Primera Demandante-Peticionario KLCE202300282 Instancia, Sala Superior de Ponce v.
Velazquez Torres, Roberto v. Lopez Del Pozo, Diana Opublic domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL ROBERTO VELÁZQUEZ CERTIORARI TORRES procedente del Tribunal Recurrida de Primera Instancia, KLCE202301105 Sala Superior de Ponce. v. consolidado con
Velazquez Torres, Roberto v. Lopez Del Pozo, Diana Opublic domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL ROBERTO VELÁZQUEZ CERTIORARI TORRES procedente del Tribunal Recurrida de Primera Instancia, KLCE202301105 Sala Superior de Ponce. v. consolidado con
Matter of Heaven A. A. (Tyrone W.--Stephanie A.)public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Dillon, J. We are asked to address whether a Family Court may render a determination that a putative father has abandoned a child so as to free the child for adoption, if there is not first a threshold finding that the putative father is, in fact, the father of the child. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that where paternity
Floyd v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit remanded Floyd and Ligón to the District Court to resolve pending motions to intervene in these actions and to “effectuate a settlement” between “such concerned or interested parties as the District Court deems appropriate.” Floyd, ECF No. 426; Ligon, ECF
Johnson v. Jessuppublic domain
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, Chief District Judge. This civil action arises out of the revocation of Plaintiffs' North Carolina driver's licenses, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-24.1(a)(2), because of Plaintiffs' failure to pay court fines and costs for motor vehicle violations. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and
Torres v. New York State Board of Electionspublic domain
462 F.3d 161 Margarita López TORRES, Steven Banks, C. Alfred Santillo, John J. Macron, Lili Ann Motta, John W. Carroll, Philip C. Segal, Susan Loeb, David J. Lansner, Common Cause/NY, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Neil W. Kelleher, Carol Berman, Helen Moses Donohue, and Evelyn J. Aquila, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the New York State Board of Elections, Defendants-Appellants,
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 23-APR-2025 02:00 PM Dk
SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I In the Matter of the JULY 2023 EXAMINATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I NOTICE OF PASSING THE HAWAI#I BAR EXAMINATION The applicants listed below are hereby notified that each has passed the July 2023 Hawai#i examination for admission to the Bar of the State of H
Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.public domain
919 S.W.2d 644 (1996) Robert and Toni AMSTADT et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES BRASS CORPORATION, Respondent. UNITED STATES BRASS CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. Emery H. and Susan KOCHIE et al., Respondents. UNITED STATES BRASS CORPORATION, Shell Oil Company d/b/a Shell Chemical Company, and Hoechst Celanese Corporation, Petitioners, v. Nabeel ANDRAUS et al., Respondents. Nos. 94-0008, 94-00
Berger v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
ORDER CARR, District Judge.1 This is an “Engle-progeny”2 suit by Plaintiff Judith Berger (Mrs. Berger), a former smoker of cigarettes, against the manufacturer of those cigarettes, Defendant Philip Morris USA, Inc. (PMUSA). Following trial, the jury returned a compensatory damages verdict of $6.25 million (with a 40% comparative fault finding) and
Staci Snider v. Jeffrey Sniderpublic domain
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 317 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II NO. CV-23-417 STACI SNIDER Opinion Delivered May 15, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE UNION COUNTY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 70DR-19-126] JEF
Dahl v. Bain Capital Partners, LLCpublic domain
655 F.Supp.2d 146 (2009) Kirk DAHL, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. BAIN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-12388-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 22, 2009. *147 Arthur L. Shingler, III, Hal Cunningham, Christopher M. Burke, Kr
STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 113-8-14 Vtec Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250 Permit ENTRY REGARDING MOTION Count 1, Act 250 District Commission Decision (113-8-14 Vtec) Count 2, Act 250 District Commission Decision (113-8-14 Vtec) Title:
United States v. Farias-Gonzalezpublic domain
556 F.3d 1181 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose FARIAS-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-10508. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. February 3, 2009. *1182 Richard Brooks Holcomb and Stephanie Kearns, Fed. Pub. Defenders, Fed. Def. Program, Inc., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.</
Dahl v. BAIN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLCpublic domain
760 F.Supp.2d 196 (2011) Kirk DAHL, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. BAIN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-12388-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 13, 2011. Arthur L. Shingler, III, Hal Cunningham, Scott & Scott LLP, George C. Aguilar, Brian J. Robbins, Rob