Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
10 opinions for “Stephany v. BMO Harris Bank”
Sawczyn v. BMO Harris Bank National Ass'npublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge. INTRODUCTION In this action, Plaintiff Steve Sawczyn alleges the automated teller machines (“ATMs”) of Defendant BMO Harris Bank National Association (“BMO”) were not ac*1110cessible to him as a legally blind individual, in violation of Title III of the Americans
Weitz Co. v. Hethpublic domain
Justice TIMMER, opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes § 33-992(A) gives mechanics’ liens priority over liens recorded after construction begins on real property. We are asked to decide whether that statute precludes assignment by equitable subrogation of a lien that attached before construction began on the project at issue. We hold that it does not. Additionally, although a third party generall
Keybank Nat'l Ass'n v. Franklin Advisers, Inc.public domain
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: *219These cases concern a contractual dispute among creditors that provided financing to a bankrupt Chapter 11 debtor so that the debtor could continue operating during its reorganization. Plaintiffs KeyBank National Association and Fifth Third Bank initially brought this action in the Supreme Cour
Darlene Gibbs v. Sequoia Capital Operationspublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2108 DARLENE GIBBS; STEPHANIE EDWARDS; LULA WILLIAMS; PATRICK INSCHO; LAWRENCE MWETHUKU; GEORGE HENGLE; TAMARA PRICE; SHERRY BLACKBURN, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. SEQUOIA CAPITAL OPERATIONS, LL
Darlene Gibbs v. Haynes Investments, LLCpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1434 DARLENE GIBBS; STEPHANIE EDWARDS; LULA WILLIAMS; PATRICK INSCHO; LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. HAYNES INVESTMENTS, LLC; L. STEPHEN HAYNES; SOVEREIGN BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC
The Weitz Company v. Nicholas Hethpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA THE WEITZ COMPANY L.L.C., AN IOWA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. NICHOLAS HETH, A SINGLE MAN; BARRY SCHWARTZ, A MARRIED MAN; JEFFREY TEMPLIN, A MARRIED MAN; KEN PERLMUTTER, A MARRIED MAN; SHELLY MALKIN, A MARRIED WOMAN; JODY STORM GALE AND CHRISTIE BAUER GALE, HUSBAND AND WIFE; JEFF TEMPLIN AND TERRI TEMPLIN, HUSBAND AND WIF
The Weitz Company v. Nicholas Hethpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA THE WEITZ COMPANY L.L.C., AN IOWA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. NICHOLAS HETH, A SINGLE MAN; BARRY SCHWARTZ, A MARRIED MAN; JEFFREY TEMPLIN, A MARRIED MAN; KEN PERLMUTTER, A MARRIED MAN; SHELLY MALKIN, A MARRIED WOMAN; JODY STORM GALE AND CHRISTIE BAUER GALE, HUSBAND AND WIFE; JEFF TEMPLIN AND TERRI TEMPLIN, HUSBAND AND WIF
Weisman v. Blue Mountain Organics Distrib., LLCpublic domain
Weisman v. Blue Mountain Organics Distrib., LLC, 2014 NCBC 41. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF GUILFORD 13 CVS 3490 ANNE L. WEISMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BLUE MOUNTAIN ORGANICS ) DISTR
E. Ohman J:or Fonder Ab v. Nvidia Corporationpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT E. OHMAN J:OR FONDER AB; No. 21-15604 STICHTING PENSIOENFONDS PGB, Lead Plaintiffs, D.C. No. 4:18-cv- 07669-HSG Plaintiffs-Appellants, and OPINION IRON WORKERS LOCAL 580 JOINT FUNDS, Plaintiff, v. NVIDIA CORPORATION; JENSEN HUANG; COLETTE KRESS; JEFF FISHER, Defendants-Appel
Staggers v. Medtronic, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES ex rel. MELISSA ) STAGGERS and RHONDA ) KURDELMEYER, ) ) Plaintiffs-Relators, ) ) v. ) Case No. 15-cv-392 (TSC/GMH)