Cases

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC15-1538 ____________ EMMA GAYLE WEAVER, etc., Petitioner, vs. STEPHEN C. MYERS, M.D., et al., Respondents. [November 9, 2017] LEWIS, J. This ca

ORDÉR REGARDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARIANNE O; BATTANI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter — involving five competing claims to an interpleader fund arising from the sale of a catalog of songs of which Edward Holland, Jr. was a co-author — is before the Court on motions for summary judgment filed by the United .States of America (“US”) (Doc.

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed August 29, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00597-CV STEPHEN LEE HOLLAND, Appellant V. MARIA ELISABETH HOLLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

796 F.Supp.2d 928 (2011) Rick L. HOLLAND, Plaintiff v. Pat RICHTER, Richard Carlson, and City of Rock Island, Illinois, Defendants. Case No. 09-4001. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois. June 17, 2011. *929 Elizabeth J. Cervantes, Bozeman Neighbour Patton & Noe, Stephen T. Fieweger, Katz Huntoon & Fieweger PC, Mol

GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: After devoting his life to mining, mining engineer Steven Svatek seized a golden opportunity to provide for his retirement. Struggling to build the success of his company, a small firm that lacked the resources to promote and sell its bulk materials handling products, Svatek accepted the offer of an internationally established mining systems provider to purchase his company's intellect

03/06/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 15, 2024 Session STEPHEN BOESCH v. SCOTT D. HALL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sevier County No. 20-CV-595-III David R. Duggan, Judge

439 F.Supp.2d 644 (2006) Gerald James HOLLAND Petitioner v. James ANDERSON, Commissioner, and Walter Booker, Superintendent Respondents. No. 1:98 CV 562B. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division. June 29, 2006. *645 *646 *647

OPINION ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Cindy Prebilich-Holland (“Pre-bilich”) appeals the district court’s grant of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this action claiming a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k). Specifically, Prebilich claimed that her employer, Gaylord Entertain

95 S.W.3d 815 (2003) 80 Ark.App. 316 Bobbie HOLLAND and Donald Holland, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Judge Stephen F. LEFLER, M.D., et al. No. CA 02-342. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I. January 22, 2003. *817 Walker & Dunklin, by: Larry G. Dunklin and Victoria N. Ewenike; and Terre

Filed 1/23/14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA JOSEPH E. HOLLAND, as Assessor, etc., ) ) Plaintiff and Appellant, ) ) S205876 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/6 B229656 ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD NO. 1, ) ) Defendant and Respondent; )

526 F.3d 880 (2008) Bobby BAILEY and Robert Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. USF HOLLAND, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-5304. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: May 2, 2008. Decided and Filed: May 16, 2008. *881 ARGUED: Toni Querry Farkas, Frantz Ward, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. Stephe

180 P.3d 955 (2008) Stuart HALLAM, individually and as class representative, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, INC., Holland America Linewestours, Inc., and Westours Motor Coaches, Inc., Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Nos. S-12573, S-12584. Supreme Court of Alaska. April 18, 2008. *956 John E. Casperson and William

ROBERT D. BELL, Judge. 11 Plaintiff/Appellant, American Fidelity Life Insurance Company, appeals from the trial court's order denying Appellant's administrative appeal of an order of Defendant/Appellee, former Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner Kim Holland (Commissioner).1 *391The Commissioner's order found Appellant violated the Military Sal

444 F.Supp.2d 831 (2006) Bobby BAILEY and Robert P. Smith, Plaintiffs, v. USF HOLLAND, INC., Defendant. No. 3:05-0435. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. July 17, 2006. *832 *833 *834 *835

216 F.Supp.2d 227 (2002) Darryl HOLLAND, Petitioner, v. Edward R. DONNELLY, Superintendent, Wende Correctional Facility, and Hon. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondents. No. 01 Civ. 2292(GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 14, 2002. *228 *229 S

341 B.R. 77 (2006) In re Scott M. ZIMMERMAN, Debtor. Cynthia Holland, Individually and as Trustee of the Michael T. Holland, Inc. Pension Plan and Trust; Michael Holland, Individually and as Trustee of the Michael T. Holland, Inc. Pension Plan and Trust, William Keller, Suzanne Keller, Suzan Latona, Carmen Latona, Ed Hall, William Klump, Robert Thorn, Wayne Witter, Jo Ann Worrell, and Richard Worrell, Plaintiffs, v. Scott M. Zimmerman, Defend

*967OPINION BY WECHT, J.: Stephen W. (“Father”) appeals from the December 21, 2011 order dismissing in part and granting in part his exceptions to the August 5, 2011 hearing officer’s recommendation for child support. Suzanne D. (“Mother”) cross-appeals from the same order, which granted in part and dismissed in part her cross-exceptions. After careful

ORDER BERMAN, District Judge. I. Background On March 22, 2001, Plaintiffs Edward and Brian Holland and four (4) Delaware limited partnerships and corporations (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) commenced an action against Defendants Fahnestock & Co, Inc. (“Fahnes-tock”), David Pullman (“Pullman”), Mazuma Capital, Inc. (“Mazuma”), and Tom Ghyczy (“Ghyczy”) (collectivel

Appeal No. 28228 from Judgment dated October 26,1992, Robert Lewis Gibbs Ruling Judge, Hinds County Circuit Court, First Judicial District. *660Before SULLIVAN, P.J., and McRAE and MILLS, JJ. Affirmed.

TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Respectfully, I agree with the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that the term “reimbursements,” a component of the “per beneficiary premium” formula prescribed by the Coal Act in § 9704(b)(2), is not clear and unambiguous. See Holland v. National Mining Ass’n, 309 F.3d 808, 816 (D.C.Cir.2002). Although I am inclined to agree that the Commissioner’