Cases

547 F.3d 1051 (2008) David SERENA; Manuel Escamilla; Carmen Alvarez; Alejandra Hernandez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Stephen L. MOCK, Presiding Judge, Superior Court of Yolo County, individually and in his official capacity; Robin Weaver, Yolo County Jury *1052 Commissioner, individually and in her official capacity; Thomas Warriner, Judge, Superior Court of Yolo County, individually and in his official capacit

MEMORANDUM ** Dale M. Wallis appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing her 42 *121U.S.C. § 1988 action alleging that Superior Court Judge Stephen L. Mock violated her due process rights by ordering her to comply with discovery requests for trade secrets. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissals for lack

57 P.3d 803 (2002) 138 Idaho 92 Connie L. HINDMARSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Martin L. MOCK, Defendant-Respondent. No. 27704. Supreme Court of Idaho, Idaho Falls, September 2002 Term. October 24, 2002. *804 McBride & Roberts, Idaho Falls, for appellant. Michael R. McBride argued. Thomsen & S

197 B.R. 468 (1996) In re William R. MOCK, Debtor. William R. MOCK, Plaintiff, v. HANNET, INC. and Janette O'Hanlon, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 95-18946SR. Adv. No. 95-0937. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 19, 1996. *469 Edward E. Cohen, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff and debtor William Mock.

OPINION Lexington National Insurance Company (Lexington) appeals from an order denying its motion to vacate the forfeiture and exonerate a bail bond and from the summary judgment entered in favor of Yolo County. Lexington contends, among other things, that the trial court erred in finding its motion was untimely because it was not filed within 185 days of the mailing of the notice of forfeiture. We disagree and shall affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKG

PERRET, Judge. Defendant, Stephen Lloyd Mock, appeals his conviction of one count of sexual battery, a violation of La.R.S. 14:43.1. Because we find that the district court lacked jurisdiction over Defendant, we hereby vacate Defendant's conviction and sentence for sexual battery and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

PERRET, Judge. Defendant, Stephen Lloyd Mock, appeals his conviction of one count of sexual battery, a violation of La.R.S. 14:43.1. Because we find that the district court lacked jurisdiction over Defendant, we hereby vacate Defendant's conviction and sentence for sexual battery and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

Case: 23-10319 Document: 00516842296 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/01/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ____________

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I, III, IV, and V. Defendant Scott James Barrett challenges his conviction of committing gross vehicular manslaughter and driving under the influence. Except to remand the matter for a hearing on victim restitution, we affirm the judgment. PROCEDURAL HISTORY By i

OPINION In talking with an investigator from the Yolo County Public Defender's Office, defendant implicated himself in a shooting and then asked for an attorney. The investigator contacted the police, apprising them of defendant's involvement and his request for an attorney, and defendant accompanied the investigator to the police department. Without obtaining an attorney for defendant, police advised defendant of his Miranda

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I, II, IV V. Defendant Gary Brian Evans was sentenced to an aggregate term of seven years in prison in three cases stemming from acts of domestic *Page 666 violence against his wife. On appeal, defendant contends the admission of other inc

Corrected Reprint 10/31/2008 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID SERENA; MANUEL  ESCAMILLA; CARMEN ALVAREZ; ALEJANDRA HERNANDEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STEPHEN L. MOCK, Presiding No. 07-15218 Judge, Superior Court of Yolo County, individually and in his  D.C. No. CV-

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1287 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1288 OPINION Plaintiff obtained a judgment against defendant for breach of a written contract and was award

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part II. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 747 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREF

403 F.Supp. 971 (1975) Julian WILKERSON, a minor, by his parent and natural guardian Gracie Wilkerson, and Gracie Wilkerson, in her own right v. George MOCK, Police Officer, et al. Civ. A. No. 75-1874. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. October 15, 1975. *972 Allen H. Silverman, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHEN TAMUFOR FON, No. 20-73166 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A203-679-900 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHEN TAMUFOR FON, No. 20-73166 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A203-679-900 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00708-CV Melanie Mock, Appellant v. St. David’s Healthcare Partnership, LP, LLP, a Texas Limited Liability Partnership, Appellee FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-21-001108, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDI

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STEPHEN BEROUTY, ) ) Appellant, ) v.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-4218 Doc: 58 Filed: 07/14/2026 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-4218 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEPHEN L. SNYDER, Defendant - Appell