Cases

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge FLOYD joined. DIAZ, Circuit Judge: Waugh Chapel South, LLC, WCS LLC, WCS Properties Business Trust (collectively “WCS”) sued the United Food and Commercial Workers Union Locals 27 and 400 (“UFCW”) and the Mid-Atlantic Retail Food

487 A.2d 1132 (1985) Ernest S. JOHNSTON, Woodrow R. Praught, and John G. Baron, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Emanuel L. WOLF, Jay N. Feldman, Joseph J. Gruenberg, Andrew P. Jaeger, William V. Lurie, Carl Prager, Jack M. Sattinger, Robert J. Sisk, and Peter E. Strauss, Defendants Below, Appellees. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted

372 A.2d 178 (1977) Alethia G. MOSLEY, Claimant-Appellant below, Appellant, v. BANK OF DELAWARE, Employer-Appellee below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted October 18, 1976. Decided February 9, 1977. Oliver V. Suddard, Wilmington, for claimant-appellant below, appellant. Stephen P. Casarino of Tybout & Redfearn, P.A., Wilmington, for employer

391 A.2d 196 (1978) Ronald BILLOPS et al., Plaintiffs below, Appellants, v. MAGNESS CONSTRUCTION CO., a corporation of the State of Delaware, t/a Brandywine Hilton Inn, Hilton Inns, Inc., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Hilton Hotels Corporation, a corporation of the State of Delaware, and Hilton International Co., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendants below, Appellees. Supreme Court of Delaware.</

SARGUS, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which NORRIS, J., joined. CLAY, J. (pp. 417-40), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION SARGUS, District Judge. Defendants have appealed the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Plaintiffs and issuing a permanent injunction prohibiting the Industrial Development Board (“Board”) and the Metropolitan Government (“

367 A.2d 983 (1976) STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff, v. Herbert Lee SPENCE, Defendant. Roy Luther RICHARDSON, Defendant below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff below, Appellee. Franklin C. FORAKER, Defendant below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff below, Appellee. Linwood Lee SHIELDS, Defendant below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff below, Appellee. Alan B. CARPENTER, Defendant b

ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. This case involves two appeals arising out of an antitrust action brought by two nurse midwives, the obstetrician with whom they had affiliated, and three of their clients, against three Nashville hospitals, certain members of the medical staffs from two of the hospitals, another practicing obstetrician in Nashville, and a physician-controlled insurance company. Plaintiffs alleged that these de

598 F.Supp. 529 (1984) James C. SANFORD, et ux., Plaintiffs, v. The CELOTEX CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 3-84-0698. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. October 3, 1984. H. Douglas Nichol, Gillenwater, Nichol & Ames, Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiffs. Maclin P. Davis, Jr., William L. Brooks, George E. Copple, Jr., Waller, Lan

WEBSTER, Judge. In this workers’ compensation case, claimant seeks review of an order denying his claim for benefits as barred by the statute of limitations. Claimant argues that the order should be reversed because the undisputed evidence establishes that he received remedial attention from an authorized physician less than two years before he filed his claim. We agree and, accordingly, reverse. Claimant in

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge. Plaintiffs are five nonprofit organizations seeking to invalidate federal regulations that require employer-sponsored health insurance plans to include coverage for contraceptives, abortifacients, and sterilization at no cost to the plan beneficiaries. All five organizations object to the challenged r

Opinion issued March 7, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00014-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellants V. EDWARD A. AND NORMA KERR, PATTIE ACKERM

ORDER HARRY S. MATTICE, JR., District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Doc. 16). Plaintiffs move the Court to enjoin Defendant Hamilton County, Tennessee (“Hamilton County” or “the County”) from continuing its practice of commencing meetings of the Hamilton County Commission (“the Commission”) Avith a prayer. This case presents a unique question, the le

457 A.2d 339 (1983) Robert E. HIBBERT, et al., Plaintiffs Below, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. HOLLYWOOD PARK, INC., Defendant Below, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: October 13, 1982. Decided: February 15, 1983. Stephen E. Herrmann (argued) and Thomas A. Beck, Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, for appellants/cross-appellees.

689 S.W.2d 155 (1984) Cory L. AYERS, a minor by his parents and natural guardians Lynn L. AYERS and Virginia W. Ayers, and Lynn L. Ayers and Virginia W. Ayers, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RUTHERFORD HOSPITAL, INC., Dr. Terry J. Witt, and Dr. Charles Smith, Defendants-Appellees. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section at Nashville. October 23, 1984. Application

Opinion issued March 7, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00014-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellants V. EDWARD A. AND NORMA KERR, PATTIE ACKERMNANN AND

232 F.Supp.2d 362 (2002) Mark A. DIENER, Stephen Garisto, Jim Grove, Pearl Grove, Jeff Mayon, Lee Smith, Jason Storms, Sheri Sucec, and John K. Young, Plaintiffs, v. Stephen R. REED, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Harrisburg, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:CV-02-0977. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. December 2, 2002.

*383Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge NIEMEYER joined. GREGORY, Circuit Judge. In the wake of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) was charged with securing the nation’s 429 commercial airports. In early 2002, TSA contracted with P

420 A.2d 1186 (1980) Walter EVANS, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted August 21, 1980. Decided September 8, 1980. Morton Richard Kimmel and Michael Weiss (argued), of Kimmel & Spiller, P. A., Wilmington, for defendant-appellant. Charles M. Oberly, III, (argued) Asst. State's Pr

OPINION OF THE COURT NYGAARD, Circuit Judge. Appellant Todd Chapman filed a voluminous civil rights complaint against various officials of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as well as several private entities. The District Court dismissed the complaint. We will affirm. I. The facts of this case are set forth at length in the parties’ briefs and, therefore, will only be su

492 A.2d 552 (1985) Frank Cole WHALEN, Jr., Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: July 2, 1984. Decided: April 12, 1985. Nancy Jane Mullen (argued), J. Dallas Winslow, Jr., Patricia C. Hannigan, Asst. Public Defenders, Wilmington, for appellant. Kevin O'Brien (argued), Deputy Atty. G