⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Stephen McKean v. Nationwide Insurance Co”

District Court, N.D. California · 1989-10-10 · Published · cited 11× · 723 F. Supp. 464; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11170; 1989 WL 120327
723 F.Supp. 464 (1989) In re INSURANCE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. No. MDL 767. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 10, 1989. *465 Edwin A. Heafey, Jr., Raoul D. Kennedy, Richard de Saint Phalle, Dolores A. Dalton, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Oakland, Cal., for Administrative Liaison. John G. Harkins, Jr., Eleano
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985-06-17 · Published · cited 4× · 764 F.2d 968; 54 U.S.L.W. 2016
OPINION OF THE COURT SEITZ, Circuit Judge. Defendants Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (“Aetna”) and Travelers Indemnity Company and Travelers Insurance Company (“Travelers”) appeal from a judgment of the district court made final pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) that granted plaintiff ACandS, Inc.’s (“ACandS”) motion for partial summary judgment in this declaratory judgment action. Subject matter jurisdi
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985-06-17 · Published · cited 80× · 764 F.2d 968; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 19879
764 F.2d 968 54 USLW 2016 ACANDS, INC., Appellee,v.The AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and The TravelersIndemnity Company and the Travelers InsuranceCompany, Appellants,v.ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. Nos. 83-1927, 83-1928. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Oct. 22, 1984.Decided June 17, 198
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2014-09-29 · Published · cited 3× · 114 F. Supp. 3d 549
ORDER HARRY S. MATTICE, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 140). For the reasons stated hereafter, Defendant’s Motion will be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that Defendant is only seeking summary judgment as to the Government’s use of statistical sampl
Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2007-04-11 · Published · cited 0×
DECISION Before this Court are various motions for summary judgment and for partial summary judgment pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. Rule 56, brought by the Plaintiffs and the various Defendants in this action. Also before the Court is Cookson Group plc's motion to dismiss pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. I
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2017-12-07 · Published · cited 11× · 176 A.3d 632
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRIDGEVILLE RIFLE & PISTOL CLUB, § LTD.; MARK HESTER; JOHN R. § No. 15, 2017 SYLVESTER; MARSHALL KENNETH § WATKINS; BARBARA BOYCE, DHSc § RDN; ROGER T. BOYCE, SR.; and the § Court Below: DELAWARE STATE SPORTSMEN’S § Superior Court of the ASSOCIATION, § State of Delaware
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981-11-04 · Published · cited 47× · 663 F.2d 686; 214 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 775; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16322
663 F.2d 686 214 U.S.P.Q. 775 SAMBO'S RESTAURANTS, INC., and Sambar Properties, Inc.,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The CITY OF ANN ARBOR; George W. Gardner and G. M. Scofield,Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-1338. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Dec. 11, 1980.Decided Nov. 4, 1981.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989-12-08 · Published · cited 10× · 891 F.2d 304; 282 U.S. App. D.C. 5; 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2130; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18672; 1989 WL 147180
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge RUTH BADER GINSBURG. MIKVA, Circuit Judge: Appellants in this action challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the United States Postal Service (“USPS” or “Postal Service”). The district court found that appellants lacked standing to seek review of a final order of the USPS whic
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009-07-27 · Published · cited 6× · 662 F. Supp. 2d 1069; 15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 161; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65244; 2009 WL 2242231
662 F.Supp.2d 1069 (2009) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: 3:05-CV-596 (Slayman—Oregon) 3:07cv120 (Nevada) 3:07cv272 (Arizona) 3:07cv322 (Connecticut) 3:07cv324 (Givens—FLSA) 3:07cv325 (Vargas—MCSA) 3:07cv326 (North Carolina) 3:07cv328 (Leighter—Oregon) 3:08cv336 (Ohio) 3:07cv411 (Georgia) 3:07cv412 (Vermont) 3:07cv478 (Colorado) 3:08cv193 (Boudreaux—Louisiana) 3:08c
Supreme Court of the United States · 1995-05-22 · Published · cited 478× · 131 L. Ed. 2d 881; 115 S. Ct. 1842; 514 U.S. 779; 1995 U.S. LEXIS 3487
514 U.S. 779 (1995) U. S. TERM LIMITS, INC., et al. v. THORNTON ET AL. No. 93-1456. United States Supreme Court. Argued November 29, 1994. Decided May 22, 1995.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS *781 *781 Stevens, J., delivered the opinion of the Co
Smith v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979-01-26 · Published · cited 36× · 398 A.2d 426; 41 Md. App. 277; 18 A.L.R. 4th 927; 1979 Md. App. LEXIS 235
41 Md. App. 277 (1979) 398 A.2d 426 HOMER JAMES SMITH v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 1408, September Term, 1977. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 26, 1979. The cause was argued before MOYLAN, MELVIN and COUCH, JJ. Alfred L. Scanlan, Jr., Assigned Public Defender, with whom were Whiteford, Taylor, Preston, Trim