Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Steven A. Ward and Melinda J. Ward”
Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II v. Allina Health Systempublic domain
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-0794 Court of Appeals Anderson, J. Concurring, Lillehaug, J. Took no part, Hudson, Chutich, JJ. Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T.
In re S.C. and N.D.public domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED In re S.C. and N.D. September 23, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREM
In Re the Protective Proceedings of Tammy J.public domain
270 P.3d 805 (2012) In the Matter of the Protective Proceedings of TAMMY J. No. S-13698. Supreme Court of Alaska. March 2, 2012. *807 Ted Stepovich, Law Office of Ted Stepovich, Fairbanks, for Appellants Theresa H. and Jeff J. (limited appearance for oral argument). Elizabeth Russo, Assistant Public Advocate, and Rachel Levitt, Pu
MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, District Judge. This case is a consolidated securities class action in which the court-appointed lead plaintiff, the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, asserts claims on behalf of the class of individuals (“plaintiffs”) who purchased common stock of AOL-Time Warner, Inc. (“AOL”) from January 12, 2001, through July 24, 2002 (“the Class Period”). The defend
ACCEPTED 13-15-00024-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/6/2015 3:52:31 PM
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
In Re WellNx Marketing & Sales Practices Litigationpublic domain
673 F.Supp.2d 43 (2009) In re WELLNX MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. MDL No. 07-md-1861. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 11, 2009. *45 Leah A. Ayala, John R. Bailey, Bailey & Merrill, Las Vegas, NV, David A. Barry, *46 Samuel M. Furgang, Andrew R. Levin, Sugarman
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
State v. Casepublic domain
928 P.2d 1239 (1996) STATE of Alaska, Appellant, v. Steven P. CASE, Appellee. No. A-5968. Court of Appeals of Alaska. December 13, 1996. James P. Doogan, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, Harry L. Davis, District Attorney, Fairbanks, and Bruce M. Botelho, Attorney General, Juneau, for Appellant. James W. McGowan, Sitka, for Appellee. Before BRYNER, C.J
City of Little Rock v. Carpenterpublic domain
288 S.W.3d 647 (2008) CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, Arkansas; Pulaski County Sheriff's Office, Appellants, v. Willie CARPENTER, Appellee. No. 08-171. Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 30, 2008. *648 Thomas M. Carpenter, Little Rock City Attorney, for appellant. Owings Law Firm, Little Rock, by: Steven A. Owings and Tammy B. Gattis
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
In re D.M.-D.public domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS In re D.M.-D. FILED May 26, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK No. 19-0716 (Kanawha County 15-JA-366) SUPREME C
People v. Kellerpublic domain
739 N.W.2d 505 (2007) 479 Mich. 467 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael David KELLER, Defendant-Appellee. The People Of The State Of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Melinda Sue KELLER, Defendant-Appellee. Docket Nos. 131223, 131224. Supreme Court of Michigan. July 25, 2007.
Nix v. Nixpublic domain
OPINION HANSEN, Presiding Judge: Appellant, Melinda Yvonne Nix (Mother), seeks review of the trial court’s order deny*492ing her motion to revoke the guardianship of her natural child, Jasmine Whitiney Nix (Child). Mother was divorced from Child’s father, Appellee George Steven Nix (Father), in March 1993. Mother and Father agreed at that t
in Re Eduardo Del Pinopublic domain
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
In re Conservatorship For Mary N. Ayerspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 07, 2015 Session IN RE CONSERVATORSHIP FOR MARY N. AYERS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County No. 18694 Nolan Goolsby, Judge ________________________________ No. M2014-01522-COA-R3-CV – Filed June 24, 2015 _________________________________
Lajaunie v. Colony Ins. Co.public domain
767 So.2d 933 (2000) Harold A. LAJAUNIE, Jr., Angela Lajaunie, Rachal Lajaunie, and Melinda Lajaunie v. COLONY INSURANCE CO., and Arthur Taylor and Allstate Insurance Company. No. 99 CA 1771. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. September 22, 2000. *934 Larry Minton, Alexandria, for Plaintiffs/Appellants, Harold Lajaunie,
Antonio G. v. Superior Courtpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 424 OPINION This petition is on behalf of a juvenile ward of the court. It seeks a ruling from this court reversing the denial by the superior court judge of a peremptory challenge filed on behalf of the minor. The challenge was filed in connection with a juvenile court hearing of a supplemental
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF LONE STAR SECURITY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [78] AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [82] OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The present Cross-Motions for. Summary Judgment ask this Court to determine the constitutionality of four city ordinances that prohibit the parking of “mobile billboard' advertising displays” on c