Cases

In re:. Cook & Stevens and Avery L. Cook applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 245 So.2d 798. Writ refused. On the facts found by the court of appeal, the result is correct. . SUMMERS, Justice, is of the opinion the writ should be granted for the reasons assigned by Judge Culpepper.

CULPEPPER, Judge (dissenting). I cannot agree that a partnership existed under the written agreement between the parties. In Darden v. Cox, 240 La. 310, 123 So.2d 68 (1960) our Supreme Court held: “The Civil Code and the jurisprudence set out several things which are necessary to a business relationship before it can be considered a partnership as between the parties to it. First, th

AFFIRMED.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.

AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Sno-homish County, No. 14-1-01562-8, George N. Bowden, J, entered February 19, 201Q. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Schindler, J., concurred in by Spearman and Mann, JJ.

P. THOMAS THORNBRUGH Presuimg Judge. T1 Appellant, Tabitha Stevens (Tabitha), appeals the decision of the district court dismissing her Petition to Establish Paternity against alleged father Freddie David Griggs (Freddie). On review, we agree with the district court that Tabitha's paternity action is barred by applicable provisions of the Oklahoma Umform Parentage Act, The Act clearly addresses this situation and unequivocal

Defendants, Joseph and Martha Stevens, appeal *Page 136 from a judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court and raise two assignments of error as follows: "I. The trial court erred in finding judgment in favor of the Plaintiff/Appellee Robert Cook, doing business as R.D. Cook Company, by holding that the contract in question, did not constitute a `Home Solicitation Sale' as governed by Ohio Revised Code Sections 1345.21

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 14-1-01562-8, George F.B. Appel, J., entered October 23, 2014.Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Spearman, C.J., concurred in by Becker and Verellen, JJ.

*924 Opinion CHIN, J. When a defendant is convicted of a crime, the sentence for that crime may sometimes be enhanced if the defendant “personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person.” (Pen. Code, § 12022.7, subd. (a).) 1

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, denied.

Opinion MILLER, J. Defendant and appellant Victoria Samantha Cook pled guilty to the misdemeanor offense of driving with a suspended license (count 4 — Veh. Code, § 14601.1, subd. (a)). Thereafter, a jury convicted defendant of three counts of gross vehicular manslaughter for the respective deaths of Zaria Williams (Williams), Christine Giambra (Giambra), and Cedric Page (Page) (counts 1-3 — Pen. Code, § 192, s

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge In August 2014, Steven Edwards (“Edwards”) was arrested and detained for five days on a warrant that had been executed and disposed of over two years earlier. Edwards has sued Cook County, among other state actors, for failing to train and supervise the employees who were responsible for updating two databases where arrest warrant i

Opinion by JUDGE CASEBOLT {1 Defendant, Steven Matthew Cook, appeals the judgment of conviction and sentences entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of twenty-nine counts of sexual exploitation of children (sale/publication, possession for distribution, and inducement or enticement to make exploitative material); unlawful sexual contact-coercion of a child; sexual assault on a child; attempted sexual ass

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (D.E. 237) JOAN A. LENARD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant Steven Lamar Cook’s Unopposed Motion for 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Sentence Reduction, (“Motion,” D.E. 237), filed on September 16, 2015, seeking a sentence reduction from a term of 136 months’ imprisonment to a term of 109 months’

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Defendant Vivien Cook appeals from the order entered by the district court on September. 13, 2016, denying Defendant’s motion to reduce sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)..-The district court denied the motion because Defendant’s original sentence was based on his status as a career offender pursuant to the Uni

Thomas Cook appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying his petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, from an interlocutory ruling of the trial court. In February, 2012, the Commonwealth filed a petition in the Superior Court pursuant to G. L. c. 123A, § 12, alleging that Cook was a sexually dangerous person. Cook filed a motion to continue the probable cause hearing, which was denied. His G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition sought relie

CCA 20100711. On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of prohibition and Petitioner’s motion for a stay of proceedings, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied, and that said petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of prohibition is hereby denied.

JOHN Z. LEE, U.S. District Judge *747In this diversity case, Cook County ("the County") has sued Kellogg Company ("Kellogg") under Illinois law for unjust enrichment, as well as for a declaratory judgment that the County is not obligated to provide free steam heat to Kellogg. Kellogg, in turn, has countersued the County for a declaratory judgment that the County is so o