⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Stewart, Steven v. Block, Melissa”

Ottah v. BMWpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-02-01 · Published · cited 3× · 230 F. Supp. 3d 192; 2017 WL 437412; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14074
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Chikezie Ottah (“Plaintiff’) brings this patent infringement action pro *194se against fifteen automobile companies (collectively, “Defendants”). This action concerns U.S. Patent no. 7,152,840 (the “’840 patent”), which is co-owned by Plaintiff.1</
People v. Orangepublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 2001-04-19 · Published · cited 112× · 749 N.E.2d 932; 195 Ill. 2d 437; 255 Ill. Dec. 450; 2001 Ill. LEXIS 476
749 N.E.2d 932 (2001) 195 Ill.2d 437 255 Ill.Dec. 450 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Leroy ORANGE, Appellant. No. 86880. Supreme Court of Illinois. April 19, 2001. Rehearing Denied June 4, 2001. *934 Steven A. Block, of Latham & Watkins, and T
United States District Court · 2019-06-27 · Published · cited 5× · 385 F. Supp. 3d 138
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge *142The Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico ("ERS" or "Plaintiff"), by and through the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico (the "Oversight Board"), commenced this adversary proceeding against certain secured bondholders of ERS (the "Defendants" or the "Bon
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2018-08-17 · Published · cited 2× · 590 B.R. 577
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge *582The Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico ("ERS" or "Plaintiff"), by and through the Financial Oversight and Management Board (the "Oversight Board"), brings this adversary proceeding against the above-captioned defendants (collectively, "Defendants"). Defendants, who hold b
Cintron v. Bibeaultpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1716 JERRY CINTRON, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. PAUL BIBEAULT, in his official and individual capacity; RUI DINIZ, in his official and individual capacity; MATTHEW KETTLE, in his official and individual capacity; PATRICIA ANNE COYNE- FAGUE, in her individual capacity; WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., Director, in his offici
Moore v. Watsonpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 738 F. Supp. 2d 817; 38 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2484; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92578; 2010 WL 3547966
738 F.Supp.2d 817 (2010) Gerian Steven MOORE and George Providence II, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Wayne WATSON, President, and Erma Brooks Williams, Associate to President for Communications and External Relations, in their official capacities, Defendants. No. 09 C 701. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 7, 2010.
People v. Brownpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2015-08-06 · Published · cited 101× · 61 Cal. 4th 968; 353 P.3d 305; 190 Cal. Rptr. 3d 583; 2015 Cal. LEXIS 5404
Opinion CORRIGAN, J. A deputy sheriff investigating an emergency call of a fight in progress pulled his patrol car behind a parked vehicle and activated the emergency lights. Approaching the car, he saw defendant Shauntrel Ray Brown sitting behind the wheel, apparently intoxicated. We conclude Brown was detained when the emergency lights were activated. A re
Dunn v. Dunnpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016-11-25 · Published · cited 10× · 219 F. Supp. 3d 1163; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166251; 2016 WL 6949585
PHASE 2A ADAP SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The plaintiffs in this putative class-action lawsuit are dozens of state prisoners and the Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program (ADAP). The defendants are officials of the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC): the Commissioner and the Associate Commissioner of Health Services.1 They are sue
Braggs v. Dunnpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019-02-11 · Published · cited 0× · 367 F. Supp. 3d 1340
Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1342On June 27, 2017, the court issued a liability opinion in which it found that the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC)'s provision of mental-health care to prisoners violates the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. That opinion noted "substantial evidence ... that ADOC is not co
Braggs v. Dunnpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 383 F. Supp. 3d 1218
Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this long-standing lawsuit, the court previously found that the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) has failed to provide adequate mental-health care to inmates in its custody in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. See Braggs v. Dunn ,
Dickson v. Ruchopublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2014-12-19 · Published · cited 1× · 367 N.C. 542; 766 S.E.2d 238
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 201PA12-2 MARGARET DICKSON, ALICIA CHISOLM, ETHEL CLARK, MATTHEW A. McLEAN, MELISSA LEE ROLLIZO, C. DAVID GANTT, VALERIA TRUITT, ALICE GRAHAM UNDERHILL, ARMIN JANCIS, REBECCA JUDGE, ZETTIE WILLIAMS, TRACEY BURNS-VANN, LAWRENCE CAMPBELL, ROBINSON O. EVERETT, JR., LINDA GARROU, HAYES McNEILL, JIM SHAW, SIDNEY E. DUNSTON, ALMA ADAMS, R. STEVE BOWDEN, JASON EDWARD COLEY, KARL BERTRAND FIELDS, PAMLYN STUBBS, DON
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2025-06-05 · Published · cited 0×
06/05/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 22, 2025 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TYLAR SCOTT JOHNSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 120345 Steven W. Sword, Judge ___________________________________
Braggs v. Dunnpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017-06-27 · Published · cited 40× · 257 F. Supp. 3d 1171
LIABILITY OPINION AND ORDER AS TO PHASE 2A EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION 1180 II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1180 III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1181 A. ADOC Facilities and Organizational Structure 1181 B. MHM Organizational Structure 1183 C. Summary of Factu
Indiana Supreme Court · 2015-06-11 · Published · cited 27× · 32 N.E.3d 1164; 2015 Ind. LEXIS 510; 2015 WL 3636188
RUSH, Chief Justice. After I.B. and W.B. were removed from their parents, both grandmothers petitioned to adopt them. The trial court permitted the maternal grandmother and her fiancé to adopt the children — even though the maternal grandmother has a prior felony conviction that statutorily disqualifies her from adopting — and the paternal grandmother appealed. The Court of Ap
Dickson v. Ruchopublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015-12-18 · Published · cited 1× · 368 N.C. 481
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 201PA12-3 Filed 18 December 2015 MARGARET DICKSON, ALICIA CHISOLM, ETHEL CLARK, MATTHEW A. McLEAN, MELISSA LEE ROLLIZO, C. DAVID GANTT, VALERIA TRUITT, ALICE GRAHAM UNDERHILL, ARMIN JANCIS, REBECCA JUDGE, ZETTIE WILLIAMS, TRACEY BURNS-VANN, LAWRENCE CAMPBELL, ROBINSON O. EVERETT, JR., LINDA GARROU, HAYES McNEILL, JIM SHAW, SIDNEY E. DUNSTON, ALMA ADAMS, R. STEVE BOWDEN, JASO
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 Ark. App. 427
Cite as 2019 Ark. App. 427 Digitally signed by Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Date: 2022.07.27 13:54:25 -05'00' DIVISIONS II AND III Adobe Acrobat version: No. CV-18-893 2022.001.20169 Opinion Delivered: October 2, 2019 MICHAEL JOHNSON, M.D.; BILL WAGNER
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012-06-27 · Published · cited 1× · 887 F. Supp. 2d 303; 2012 WL 2500364; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89387
MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Momenta”) and Sandoz Inc. (“San-doz”) (collectively, and for simplicity, “Momenta”) bring suit against Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Amphastar”), International Medication Systems, Ltd. (“IMS”), Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (‘Watson”) and Watson Pharma, Inc. (“Watson Pharma”) (collectively, and for simplicity, “Am
Cargill v. Garlandpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-01-06 · Published · cited 36× · 57 F.4th 447
Case: 20-51016 Document: 00516601811 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 6, 2023
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-12-31 · Published · cited 10× · 990 F. Supp. 2d 260; 2013 WL 6912654
MEMORANDUM & ORDER KORMAN, Senior District Judge: Since the founding of the republic, the federal government has held broad authority to conduct searches at the border to prevent the entry of dangerous people and goods. In the 21st century, the most dangerous contraband is often contained in laptop computers or other electronic devices, not on. paper. This
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-03-24 · Published · cited 13× · 517 S.W.3d 320; 2017 WL 1130399; 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 2550
OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti