Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-3121 JEFFREY LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ABBVIE INC., f/k/a/ ALLERGAN, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Nor

To prevail in this antitrust litigation, the FTC must prove that defendants possessed monopoly power in the relevant market and that defendants willfully acquired or maintained that power. See Mylan Pharm. Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Pub. Ltd., 838 F.3d 421, 433 (3d Cir. 2016). Here, the FTC asserts that defendants maintained th

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 594–616 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 18, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

Case: 20-1074 Document: 132 Page: 1 Filed: 02/11/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AMGEN INC., AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, AMGEN USA, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. SANOFI, AVENTISUB LLC, FKA AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC., REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, Defendants-Appe

LINN, Circuit Judge. This case first came to this court after, inter alia, a jury verdict finding Akamai’s U.S. Pat. No. 6,108,703 (“'703 patent”) not invalid and directly infringed by Limelight, followed by the entry of judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) overturning the jury’s infringement verdict on the basis of divided infringement. Akamai Te

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BASED ON UNPA-TENTABILITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101 GEORGE H. WU, District Judge. I. Background The Court is presiding over two sets of consolidated patent infringement cases filed by Plaintiff McRO, Inc., d.b.a. Planet Blue (“Plaintiff’ or “Planet Blue”): the “Track 1” cases, consolidated under Case No. CV-12-10322,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE MATCH GROUP, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2020-0505-MTZ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: May 4, 2022 Date Decided: September 1, 2022 Michael Hanrahan, J. Clayton Athey, Corinne E. Amato, Kevin H. Davenport, Jaso

Savage, J. In this qui tam action brought under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3727 - 33, and various state laws, relators SMSPF, LLC and Panzey Belgium Harris bring claims against pharmaceutical companies, EMD Serono, Inc., and Pfizer, Inc., and marketing consultants and specialists, Quintiles I

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. Plaintiff Amalgamated Bank (“Amalgamated”) demanded to inspect the books and records of respondent Yahoo! Inc. pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, 8 Del. C. § 220. Amalgamated’s stated purpose was to investigate the hiring and subsequent firing of Yahoo’s Chief Operating Offic

*1216RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BASED ON UNPA-TENTABILITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101 GEORGE H. WU, District Judge. I. Background The Court is presiding over two sets of consolidated patent infringement cases filed by Plaintiff McRO, Inc., d.b.a. Planet Blue (“Plaintiff” or “Planet Blue”): the

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DAVID SHABBOUEI, Derivatively on ) Behalf of LULULEMON ATHLETICA ) INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0847-JRS ) LAURENT POTDEVIN, GLENN ) MURPHY, MARTHA A.M. MORFITT,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District - Judge: Background On June 26, 2014, Don Estep, a citizen of Texas, sued the following entities in Illinois state court: 1) AbbVie Inc. & Abbott Laboratories (collectively AbbVie), whose principal place of business is in Illinois; 2) Pharmacia & Upjohn Co., Inc., whose principal place of business is in

Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1269In June 2017, this court found that the Alabama prison system's "persistent and severe shortages of mental-health staff and correctional staff" are a significant factor causing the State to provide constitutionally inadequate mental-health care to prisoners. See Braggs v. Dunn

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICHAEL CONTE, derivatively on ) behalf of SKECHERS U.S.A., INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0633-MTZ ROBERT GREENBERG, MICHAEL ) GREENBERG, DAVID WEINBERG, ) KATHERINE BLAIR, MORTON ) ERLICH, RICHARD SISKIND, ) JEFFREY

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1290 COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. GEORGE SCHAEFER, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for Norfolk, Virginia; JACQUELINE SMITH, in her official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for Prince William County, Virginia,

OPINION AND ORDER RUDY LOZANO, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Lear Seating Corporation (“Lear”) on May 5, 2016 (DE # 19), and Defendant’s Motion to Strike Inadmissible Hearsay Evidence filed by Lear on July 1, 2016 (DE # 29). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE # 19) is GRANTED,

Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge *89I. Background Before the Court is a trio of actions brought under 35 U.S.C. § 145, related to three of Gilbert Hyatt's applications to patent features of his "600

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 18-3112 _____________ SIMON CAMPBELL; PENNSYLVANIANS FOR UNION REFORM, Appellants v. PENNSYLVANIA SCHO

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE KRAFT HEINZ DEMAND ) REFUSED DERIVATIVE ) CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2022-0398-LWW MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: April 10, 2024 Date Decided: July 19, 2024 Carmella P. Keener, COOCH & TAYLOR, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; P. Bradford deLeeuw, DELEEUW LAW LLC, Wilmington, Delaware; Ben

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE INTER-LOCAL PENSION FUND ) GCC/IBT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0910-MTZ ) CALGON CARBON ) CORPORATION, )