Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Stewart v. United States”
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United States Department of Agriculturepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTIE STEWART, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-cv-1194 (TSC) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Christie Stewart—a disabled Black woman—sued her former employer, the U.S. Depa
Stewart v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PASSION STEWART, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-2573 (JEB) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Unhappy about how her local post office is handling her packages, Plaintiff Passion Stewart brought this pro se action against the United States
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
*174Pro Se Plaintiff; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Tort Claims; Criminal Claims. ORDER HORN, J. On November 3, 2016 joro se plaintiff Ni-coll Stewart filed a complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims against various state agencies and personnel including the “Department of Descrimination.”1<
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petitions for rehearing denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge Petitioner Syrenas Stewart moves to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, arguing that he no' longer qualifies for an enhanced term under the Armed Career Criminal Act, (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). His motion turns on whether simple robbery under Wis. Stat. § 943.32 still qualifies as a “violent felony” after the Supreme Court’s decision Samuel
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge. The petitioner, Jermaine Stewart, pled guilty to one count of an indictment charging him with conspiracy to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin, resulting in death. (See, e.g., Case No. 08-CR-197, Docket # 587, # 603). On March 1, 2011, the Court sentenced Mr. Stewart to a term of imprisonment of 300 months. (Case No. 08-CR-197, Docket #832, #833)
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Reginald B. Stewart appeals the district court’s order denying his request for limited discovery and dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stat