Cases

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Before the Court is a petition by Wells Fargo Advisors LLC ("Wells Fargo") to *422vacate an arbitrator's partial final clause construction arbitral award (the "Award"), which held that the parties to an arbitration agreement consented there to class-wide arbitration. Dkt. 1. The Award arises

MURDOCK, Justice (concurring in the result). The main opinion disclaims agreement with the understanding and application of various affirmative defenses upon which the arbitrators based their ruling in favor of Ernst & Young, LLP (“E & Y’). See, e.g., 159 So.3d at 1268 n. 5. This disclaimer is made for good reason. I believe the arbitrators misunderstood and misapplied critical legal pri

OPINION & ORDER VALERIE CAPRONI, United States-District Judge: Respondents Reagan Tucker (“Tucker”), Benjamin Dooley (“Dooley”) and Marvin Glasgold (“Glasgold”) (collectively the “Respondents”) commenced an arbitration proceeding before the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) against their former employer, Wells Fargo Advisors, L.L.C. (“Wells Fargo”), raising class-wide and collective claims for

951 P.2d 1027 (1997) Joseph TUCKER and Kevin Clark, Appellants, v. ACTION EQUIPMENT AND SCAFFOLD CO., INC., and Malco, Inc., Respondents. No. 27759. Supreme Court of Nevada. December 30, 1997. *1028 Hardy & Hardy, Las Vegas, for Appellants. Barker, Gillock, Koning & Brown, Las Vegas, for Respondent Action Equipment

STONE, Circuit Judge. These are two personal injury actions, one brought by John H. Larkin for injury to himself, and the other brought by him for injury to Robert Larkin, his ward. The' cases arose out of the same occurrence, were consolidated for trial, resulted in verdicts for each plaintiff. From the respective judgments entered thereon these appeals are brought. Appellants present here three matters.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 20-1641 20-1692 AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR FOREIGN STUDY, INC., d/b/a Au Pair in America; WILLIAM L. GERTZ, Plaintiffs, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. LAURA FERNANDEZ-JIMENEZ, Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellee. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT PLATT, individually and on No. 23-55737 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:22-cv-02211- DOC-ADC v. SODEXO, S.A. and SODEXO, INC., OPINION Defendants - Appell

JUSTICE WILLETT filed a concurring opinion. *498JUSTICE WILLETT, concurring. The Court holds that the Texas Arbitration Act (TAA) provides the exclusive grounds for vacatur of an arbitration award where the proceedings are governed by the TAA. The plain text of the TAA compels that result, and I join the majority opinion in full.<

MCHUGH, J. This is a personal injury case originally brought in state court by a former railroad employee against the National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak") under the Federal Employers Liability Act ("FELA"). The Complaint asserts two claims, one of which, involving the incident of July 29, 2014, Amtrak concedes falls within the Act, but the other of which, involving the incident of June 7, 2016, it contends is not cover

STUART, Justice. University Toyota and University Chevrolet Buick GMC (hereinafter referred to collectively as “the 'University dealerships”) appeal the order of the Colbert Circuit Court allowing Beverly Hardeman and Vivian Roberts to pursue their claims against the University dealerships in- arbitration proceedings conducted by the American Arbitration, Association (“the AAA”) instead of the. Better Business Bureau of Nort

756 F.Supp.2d 760 (2010) LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE INDEMNITY CO. v. GAMBRO A B, et al. Civil Action No. 05-1450. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette Division. December 21, 2010. *761 John Gregory Murphy, Morain & Murphy, John Chandler Loupe, Loupe Law Firm, Baton Rouge, LA, Peter D. St. Philhp, Jr., Lowey D

TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, concurring. I join in affirming the district court. As the panel decision recognizes, we need not decide whether the availability of classwide process is an arbitrability question. I write separately, however, to make clear precisely how our ruling differs from related opinions in other circuits. In addition, because I anticipate more circuit courts-including our own-will eventually face this difficult q

McFADDEN, Presiding Judge. Michael and Shana Dolan 1 filed a complaint against Air Mechanix, LLC, and others, 2 asserting claims arising from the allegedly negligent installation of air conditioning ductwork in the Dolans’ house. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, wh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING AND FINANCE AUTHORITY, Petitioner, Case No. 1:23-cv-02845 (TNM) v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Virgin Islands Housing and Financ

[Cite as Kettering Health Network v. Caresource, 2017-Ohio-1193.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY KETTERING HEALTH NETWORK, : et al. : : Appellate Case No. 27233 Plaintiffs-Appellees :

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 84265-0-I Respondent/Cross DIVISION ONE Appellant, v. PUBLISHED OPINION AMERICAN TOBACCO CO., Defendant, COMMONWEALTH BRANDS INC.; COMPANIA INDUSTRIAL de TABACOS MONTE PAZ, SA; DAUGHTERS & RYAN, INC.; FARMERS TOBACCO CO.; HOUSE OF PRINCE A/S; ITG BRANDS, LLC, JAPAN TOBACCO INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.; KING MAKER MARKETING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-cv-1187 (TSC) )

VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC ("Wells Fargo" or "Petitioner"), like many other employers, has elected to require its employees to arbitrate their employment disputes. While there is nothing wrong with an employer making that decision, Wells Fargo appears to want it both ways: it wants to limit its employees to an arbitral forum, but then wants to be able to get a court to intervene when it d

Case: 25-50367 Document: 69-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/10/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED February 10, 2026

WELCH, J. |2The defendant, Adam Anthony Barras, was charged by bill of information with one count of possession of heroin, a violation of La. R.S. 40:966(C). The defendant initially entered a plea of not guilty and filed a motion to suppress evidence. After the trial court denied the defendant’s motion to suppress, he entered a guilty plea pursuant to State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976), reserving his right t