Cases

Judgment rendered April 14, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 53,914-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** JERRY LEE HENDRY, JR.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ernest S. Hendry, Jr., and Judith V. Hendry appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action on statute of limitations grounds. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. *223Accor

PER CURIAM. Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of prohibition seeking to prevent the Okeechobee County Circuit Court from proceeding against him on charges of grand theft, dealing in stolen property and burglary of a structure, on the grounds of lack of speedy trial. We do not reach the speedy trial issue *1245because that issue is premature, no information h

GUNTHER, Judge. Appellant appeals the trial court’s order granting the appellees’ motion to change venue, which was based on the home venue privilege and, in the alternative, on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The motion was granted only on . the theory of the home venue privilege. The appellees concede that the trial court’s order cannot be upheld on the home venue privilege. They acknowledge th

PER CURIAM. The underlying cause of action in this lawsuit accrued in April, 1983. At that time, section 768.56, Florida Statutes (1981), providing for the award of reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party in a medical malpractice action, was still in effect. The legislature subsequently repealed this section, effective October 1, 1985, Ch. 85-175, §§ 43, 55, Laws of Fla., explicitly stating that the repeal would not

IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana FILED Craig R. Hendry, Nov 12 2025, 8:51 am Appellant-Defendant CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

PER CURIAM. Leon Greene appeals from an order of the trial court denying a motion to quash service of process. He alleges as error that individual service was never made upon him and, therefore, the trial court had no jurisdiction. We agree and reverse. Deborah and Robert Stone, plaintiffs below, filed an action against Dr. Greene and others alleging medical malpractice. The first complaint named Dr. Leon

PER CURIAM. On this appeal by the defendant in a personal injury action, from an adverse judgment based on a jury verdict, appellants contend the court erred by denying their motions for new trial and for entry of a remittitur. In support thereof appellants argue that the damages awarded were excessive, such as to shock the judicial conscience, and were improperly induced by sympathy. Upon consideration thereof

326 So.2d 241 (1976) Brainard STONE and Beulah Stone, Petitioners, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. 75-1108. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 3, 1976. *242 Wolfson, Diamond & Logan, Joe N. Unger, Miami Beach, for petitioners. High, Stack, Davis & Lazenby and Alan R. Dakan

HENDRY, Judge. The appellant was charged by a two count information with committing man*677slaughter by driving an automobile while intoxicated and manslaughter by automobile. He entered a plea of not guilty. Upon trial by a jury he was found guilty as charged and sentenced to a term of seven years in the state penitentiary. Appellant’s first point

220 So.2d 403 (1969) M.M. WEISS, Sr., Appellant, v. Leon A. STONE, Appellee. No. 68-336. District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District. March 4, 1969. Rehearing Denied April 10, 1969. Miller & Capp, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. Sibley, Giblin, Levenson & Ward and Allan M. Glaser, Miami Beach, for appellee. Before HENDR

318 U.S. 133 (1943) C.J. HENDRY CO. ET AL. v. MOORE ET AL., AS THE FISH AND GAME COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA. No. 60. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 10, 1942. Decided February 8, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. Mr. Alfred T. Cluff, with whom Mr. Arch E. Ekdale was on the brief, for petitioners.

280 F.Supp. 27 (1968) Ernest J. HENDRY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 63 Civ. 1881. United States District Court S. D. New York. February 23, 1968. *28 John R. Harold, New York City, for plaintiff. Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, by Alan G. Blumberg, New York Ci

Drennen, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in Federal income tax due from petitioners and additions to tax for fraud under section 6653(b), I.R.C. 1954, as follows: Addition to tax Year Deficiency under sec. 6653(b) 1963_ $1,187.48 1964_ 1,987.80

Mr. Presiding Justice Gredley delivered the opinion of the court. In a mechanic’s lien proceeding, commenced October 4, 1923, the master in his. report, filed May 11, 1925, recommended the allowance of two original contractors’ liens upon the premises, one in favor of Alexander Hendry. Company, complainant, for the sum of $270, with interest from February 5, 1

The contention that the act under which the accused was convicted of a misdemeanor is unconstitutional having been made for the first time in a motion for new trial, and not by demurrer to the pleadings or by *Page 204 objections to the evidence or in some other appropriate way pending the trial, such constitutional question is not properly made so as to give this court jurisdiction, and accordingly the case is transferred to the Court of Appeals.

1. It is found by the superior court that there was evidence tending to prove that the plaintiff was in the exercise of due care. Furthermore, we have examined the evidence for ourselves, so far as it is made a part of the record, and are of the opinion that it warrants the finding of the superior court in this particular. The defendants' motions for a nonsuit and verdict, upon the ground that the plaintiff was not in the exercise of due care, were therefore properly overruled. The defendants

Bedle, J. Hendry, the plaintiff below, is a minor, and, at the time of the injury complained of, was about ten years of ago. The defendants were lumber merchants in Jersey City, and had a lumber yard on Wayne street, built on piles, and through it from that street were three passages or gangways, sixteen feet wide, running northwardly a distance of about eighty feet, to another gangway of about the same width, running east and we

Bowie, C. J., delivered the opinion of this court. The questions presented by the bills of excepuon in this case, arise and depend chiefly upon the extent to which the pleadings in actions for libel are modified by the Act entitled, “An act to simplify the rules and forms of pleading and practice in the courts of law,” 1856, ch. 112. The suit was instituted on the 1 tli of November 1856, by the appellant agains

657 N.W.2d 916 (2003) 265 Neb. 539 Lance D. BAILEY, Appellee, v. LUND-ROSS CONSTRUCTORS CO., a Nebraska corporation, Appellant, and Merrimac Stone Co., a New Hampshire corporation, Appellee. No. S-02-174. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 21, 2003. *919 Thomas A. Grennan, Omaha, and Francie C. Riedmann,