Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 108.46.223.10”
Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archivepublic domain
23-1260 Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2023 Argued: June 28, 2024 Decided: September 4, 2024 Docket No. 23-1260 HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC., HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS L.L.C., JOHN WILEY &
US Dominion, Inc. v. Newsmax Media, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )
Higgin v. Albence, Miles v. Dept. of Electionspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICHAEL HIGGIN and MICHAEL ) MENNELLA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. 2022-0641-NAC THE HONORABLE ANTHONY J. ) ALBENCE, in his official capacity as ) State Election Commissioner,
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On October 6, 2011, plaintiff Intellectual Ventures I, LLC and Intellectual Ventures II, LLC (collectively “IV”) filed suit in this district against defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) alleging infringement of six patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,810,144 (“the 144 patent”), 6,412,953 (“the ’953 patent”), 7,409,450 (“the ’450
ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
726 F.Supp.2d 396 (2010) SIGRAM SCHINDLER BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT mbH,[1] Plaintiff, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. Cisco Systems, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH, Defendant. Civ. Nos. 09-72-SLR, 09-232-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. July 26, 2010. *399
United States v. Streettpublic domain
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence, filed December 1, 2017 (Doc. 78)("Motion"); (ii) the Defendant's Supplemental Motion to Suppress All Evidence Seized and Any Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Obtained as a Result of the Unlawful Search, filed July 24, 2018 (Doc. 141)("Supp. Motion"); (iii) the Defendant Bentley Streett'
the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Zachry Construction Corporationpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Michael J. DeLitta v. Nancy Schaeferpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 6142048 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
CENTER FOR AZ v. AZ SECRETARY OF STATEpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC. ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ARIZONA SECRETARY OF STATE, ET AL., Defendants/Appellees, KRISTIN MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., Intervenors/Appellees. No. CV-24-0295-PR
In re NJOY, Inc. Consumer Class Action Litigationpublic domain
*1061ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ • MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On January 17, 2014, Ben Z. Halberstam filed this putative class action on his own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated Californians against NJOY, Inc., and -Sottera, Inc. (collectively, “NJOY”).1
In Re Fort Bend County v. the State of Texaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-25-00102-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/24/2025 12:08 PM NO. 15-25-00102-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK
Perez v. Koreskopublic domain
MEMORANDUM McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Procedural History. .300 A. Administrative Enforcement Proceedings.300 B. Initial Complaint .301 C. Motion for Summary Judgment. 302 D. Supplemental Complaint.303 E. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injuncti
in Re Michelin North America, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 14-15-00578-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/22/2015 3:45:09 PM
Mozilla Corporation v. FCCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 1, 2019 Decided October 1, 2019 No. 18-1051 MOZILLA CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-
Mozilla Corporation v. FCCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 1, 2019 Decided October 1, 2019 No. 18-1051 MOZILLA CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-
Childress, Jasonpublic domain
APPENDIX TAB A EMERGENCY RELIEF REQUESTED No. IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, TEXAS IN RE JASON CHILDRESS, PETITIONER PETITON FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS On Petition For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus To The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals From Cause No. 2014CR1548 From The Comal County Court At Law #2 of Comal County, Texas
Amir Foad John Aflatouni AKA Jonathan Aflatouni v. Enclave at Grapevine, L.P., a Texas Limited Partnershippublic domain
ACCEPTED 02-17-00366-CV SECOND COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 12/20/2017 9:57 AM